mersenneforum.org > Math product of the n first mersenne number
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2004-12-21, 13:35 #1 kerguilloud   Dec 2004 3 Posts product of the n first mersenne number hi ! I hope I won't bother the forum since I am not specialist at all in these mersenne stuffs ... but when I saw the name of the website, I thought you might help me ! I need to have a closed expression of the product of the n first mersenne number, ie : P(n) = (1)x(3)x(5)x ... x(2^n-1) if it exists ... thanks for your help !!
 2004-12-21, 13:38 #2 jinydu     Dec 2003 Hopefully Near M48 2×3×293 Posts Actually, the first three Mersenne numbers are 1, 3 and 7. I'll wait for someone more knowledgeable to answer your question. Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2004-12-21 at 13:38
2004-12-22, 09:05   #3
kerguilloud

Dec 2004

3 Posts
oups

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jinydu Actually, the first three Mersenne numbers are 1, 3 and 7. I'll wait for someone more knowledgeable to answer your question.
oups ! yes you are right ... sorry about that mistake !
let me resume (I hope i am in the right forum ?) :

what is the product of the n first mersenne numbers, that is :
P(n) = 1x3x7x15x31x ... x(2^n-1) ?

In fact, I need this because i am searching :
lim (n -> infinity) of Product_(from i = 1 to n) (1-2^(-i))
but if anyone has another way to achieve this, (s)he is welcome !

 2004-12-22, 09:36 #4 jinydu     Dec 2003 Hopefully Near M48 2·3·293 Posts Unfortunately, I've learned plenty of things about infinite sums (mostly proving convergence or divergence), but school has never taught me anything about infinite products. So I don't really know how to attack such a problem... I tried letting n = 10,000 and calculating the product using Mathematica. To 50 decimal places, the answer is: 0.28878809508660242127889972192923078008891190484069 But Mathematica balks at my attempt to evaluate the limit directly.
 2004-12-26, 11:47 #5 cheesehead     "Richard B. Woods" Aug 2002 Wisconsin USA 22·3·641 Posts kerguilloud, You might want to get familiar with The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) at http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/ . OEIS has information about more than 100,000 integer sequences. You can look up your sequence 1, 3, 21, 315, 9765, ... (1, 1*3, 1*3*7, 1*3*7*15, 1*3*7*15*31, ...) there and find that it's listed as sequence A005329, "Product(2^i - 1), i=1..n. Also called 2-factorial numbers." There are links to related sequences, including various formulas. There also are links to both the decimal expansion (jinydu's Mathematica approximation is correct to 30 places) for lim (n -> infinity) of Product_(from i = 1 to n) (1-2^(-i)) and the continued fraction for it. OEIS is valuable. Bookmark it.
 2004-12-27, 00:48 #6 Zeta-Flux     May 2003 60B16 Posts Also see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InfiniteProduct.html It isn't too hard to prove that the product actually does converge. It is only slightly more difficult to see that it isn't rational.
2005-01-20, 10:16   #7
kerguilloud

Dec 2004

310 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by cheesehead kerguilloud, You might want to get familiar with The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) at http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/ . OEIS has information about more than 100,000 integer sequences. You can look up your sequence 1, 3, 21, 315, 9765, ... (1, 1*3, 1*3*7, 1*3*7*15, 1*3*7*15*31, ...) there and find that it's listed as sequence A005329, "Product(2^i - 1), i=1..n. Also called 2-factorial numbers." There are links to related sequences, including various formulas. There also are links to both the decimal expansion (jinydu's Mathematica approximation is correct to 30 places) for lim (n -> infinity) of Product_(from i = 1 to n) (1-2^(-i)) and the continued fraction for it. OEIS is valuable. Bookmark it.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Zeta-Flux Also see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InfiniteProduct.html It isn't too hard to prove that the product actually does converge. It is only slightly more difficult to see that it isn't rational.
OK I thank you all (a bit late ... sorry for that ) for these great links and solutions ...
I am disappointed that the result has no closer epxression than one using elliptic functions ... but still I thank you for illuminating my mind on this problem !

see you !!

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post lukerichards Number Theory Discussion Group 12 2018-01-22 16:45 carpetpool Miscellaneous Math 14 2017-02-26 15:55 aketilander Operazione Doppi Mersennes 1 2012-11-09 21:16 kurtulmehtap Math 12 2010-05-03 14:02 andi314 Math 4 2002-11-26 14:25

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:04.

Wed Jul 6 05:04:14 UTC 2022 up 83 days, 3:05, 0 users, load averages: 1.17, 1.31, 1.31