mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Operazione Doppi Mersennes

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-09-11, 09:12   #133
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

483010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
Testing for best GPUSievePrimes for fermat numbers with GTX 460 on a Q9450 (Yorksfield) 2.66 Ghz:

Code:
			     Best
 	  		GPUSievePrimes	 Speed
FermatFactor=30,x,x	   70k-140k	883.51 M/s
FermatFactor=40,x,x	  125k-160k	760.80 M/s
FermatFactor=50,x,x	  220k-270k	385.49 M/s
FermatFactor=60,x,x	  300k-310k	316.46 M/s
FermatFactor=70,x,x	  280k-360k	289.77 M/s
FermatFactor=80,x,x	  400k-580k	173.17 M/s
FermatFactor=90,x,x	  450k-500k	148.47 M/s
FermatFactor=100,x,x	  400k-570k	141.48 M/s
FermatFactor=125,x,x	  630k-840k	78.01 M/s
FermatFactor=150,x,x	  650k-1075k	61.62 M/s
Waiting for similar tables on other GPU models, to optimize ranges.

Please,

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-11, 12:35   #134
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

231058 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
When we reach home tonight we will post the result.txt, which is not accessible now
as promised:
(finished for MM107, I saw it is already marked on the list as finished, and partially done for the mm61, split in two semi-ranges, each semi-range split in - now 11 remaining - parts, each part would take about 9 hours and half on a gtx580 a bit overclocked and water cooled :D).

Code:
[Tue Sep 11 07:35:46 2012]
no factor for MM61 from 2^114 to 2^115 (k range: 5000T to 5100T) [mmff 0.21 mfaktc_barrett120_M61gs]
[Tue Sep 11 05:44:13 2012]
no factor for MM107 from 2^155 to 2^156 (k range: 0T to 200T) [mmff 0.21 mfaktc_barrett160_M107gs]
[Tue Sep 11 15:25:08 2012]
no factor for MM61 from 2^114 to 2^115 (k range: 6300T to 6400T) [mmff 0.21 mfaktc_barrett120_M61gs]
[Tue Sep 11 19:24:53 2012]
no factor for MM61 from 2^114 to 2^115 (k range: 5100T to 5200T) [mmff 0.21 mfaktc_barrett120_M61gs]
With flashjh's settings (816000,128,16) this scores between 611M/s and 618M/s and it seems to be close to the optimum for the card/expo/range combination. The computer can't be used (almost, but nobody need it right now).
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-11, 13:31   #135
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

1,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
The computer can't be used (almost, but nobody need it right now).
(forgot to mention that part )
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-11, 13:50   #136
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

3·17·101 Posts
Default

This project could use a boinc setup. [Not volunteering!]
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-11, 20:32   #137
MrHappy
 
MrHappy's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Paisley Park & Neverland

18510 Posts
Default

Is "FermatFactor=127,3700000e9,4000000e9" the correct worktodo entry for the reservation of: 127 3,700,000,000,000,000 4,000,000,000,000,000 ?
I'm a bit confused with your k, N, and things...

;)
MrHappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-11, 20:45   #138
Jatheski
 
Jatheski's Avatar
 
Apr 2012
993438: i1090

9216 Posts
Default

Yes or

FermatFactor=127,3700e12,4000e12 ;)
Jatheski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-11, 23:55   #139
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

344910 Posts
Default

It looks like this is still available so I would like to reserve it.

Code:
MMFactor=127,2.5e15,2.8e15
And it will take 8 days on my GTX 560.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-12, 04:15   #140
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

1,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrHappy View Post
Is "FermatFactor=127,3700000e9,4000000e9" the correct worktodo entry for the reservation of: 127 3,700,000,000,000,000 4,000,000,000,000,000 ?
I'm a bit confused with your k, N, and things...

;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jatheski View Post
Yes or

FermatFactor=127,3700e12,4000e12 ;)
I thought you had to add '2' now?: FermatFactor=129,3700e12,4000e12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
Here is the next version of mmff.
If you reserved a Fermat range from fermatsearch.org, please retest it with the new executable (but add 2 to the exponent in worktodo.txt). For example, if you tested a k range for F30 (FermatFactor=30,1.5e15,1.6e15) using the previous mmff, Luigi had you reserve a range using N=32. With this executable, retest the range using FermatFactor=32,1.5e15,1.6e15.

Last fiddled with by flashjh on 2012-09-12 at 04:42
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-12, 05:12   #141
rcv
 
Dec 2011

100011112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flashjh View Post
I thought you had to add '2' now?: FermatFactor=129,3700e12,4000e12
Quote:
Originally Posted by prime95
Here is the next version of mmff.
If you reserved a Fermat range from fermatsearch.org, please retest it with the new executable (but add 2 to the exponent in worktodo.txt). For example, if you tested a k range for F30 (FermatFactor=30,1.5e15,1.6e15) using the previous mmff, Luigi had you reserve a range using N=32. With this executable, retest the range using FermatFactor=32,1.5e15,1.6e15.
My understanding is as follows:

MMFactor work.run under mmff-0.20 is OK.
FermatFactor work run under mmff-0.20 should be discarded.

The interpretation of the FermatFactor line has changed:

Code:
 mmff-0.20:  FermatFactor=<N-2>,low,high
Code:
 mmff-0.21:  FermatFactor=N,low,high
If you get new reservations, the N and the k range you receive from Luigi should be plugged directly into the FermatFactor line. Simple. Straightforward. Ergonomic.

If you got reservations while using the old (0.20) version of mmff, you had to tweak the N value, by subtracting 2. To move that reservation to the new (0.21) version of mmff, you must undo your tweak.
rcv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-12, 05:16   #142
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

97×101 Posts
Default

"Reservation" means "N range, k range". The "+2" is there already. The correct one is 127....
This is what the site use, and the new software version. This can find factors of Fm with m<=125. Usually N>=m+2.

The older version of the program would have had to reserve the same range as "125....".

So, please do not use 129!
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-12, 07:17   #143
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

2·7·157 Posts
Default

Code:
no factor for MM107 from 2^155 to 2^156 (k range: 200T to 300T) [mmff 0.21 mfaktc_barrett160_M107gs]
no factor for MM107 from 2^156 to 2^157 (k range: 0T to 300T) [mmff 0.21 mfaktc_barrett160_M107gs]
frmky is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mersenne trial division implementation mathPuzzles Math 8 2017-04-21 07:21
trial division over a factor base Peter Hackman Factoring 7 2009-10-26 18:27
P95 trial division strategy SPWorley Math 8 2009-08-24 23:26
Trial division software for Mersenne SPWorley Factoring 7 2009-08-16 00:23
Need GMP trial-division timings ewmayer Factoring 7 2008-12-11 22:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:30.


Tue Oct 26 18:30:21 UTC 2021 up 95 days, 12:59, 0 users, load averages: 3.05, 2.82, 2.52

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.