![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
May 2017
ITALY
2·32·29 Posts |
![]()
Now place a decryptive paper.
To see if anyone can solve the problem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Aug 2006
5,987 Posts |
![]()
We start from a number N which has an unknown factorization N = a*b which we hope to discover. Your first step is computing the square root of (N-n*a)-(2*a-1) = a^2 - 2*a + 1. But we don't know the value of a, so how could we possibly find this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
203428 Posts |
![]()
you typo a few words at very least. also the column that's supposed to sum the first column doesn't work out, so I'm lost. I can send you and email if needed for you to respond to this.edit: okay I can partially see how the table gets made.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2017-12-14 at 20:47 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
May 2017
ITALY
52210 Posts |
![]() Quote:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...3D187+,+a%3D11 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Aug 2006
135438 Posts |
![]()
In other words, you'll ask Mathematica/WA to solve a Diophantine quadratic, which will eventually involve factoring the number you set out to factor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
May 2017
ITALY
2×32×29 Posts |
![]()
Hey @CRGreathouse I found a six-nary algorithm that at every level makes a square root.
Is it worth it to implement it? What is its computational complexity? It is fully functional. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
20E216 Posts |
![]()
you could always learn from implementing it, computational complexity can have two parts time and space, which one do you want to know. in this case do you mean functional as it works, or that it is purely based on functions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
May 2017
ITALY
2·32·29 Posts |
![]() Quote:
How many levels of the tree will I have to go down as a function of N? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
20E216 Posts |
![]()
depends on how many factors you plan on splitting off probably, also depends on how effective the algorithm is at factoring.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
May 2017
ITALY
2·32·29 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
100000111000102 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing | Trilo | Miscellaneous Math | 25 | 2018-03-11 23:20 |
Primality test based on factorization of n^2+n+1 | carpetpool | Miscellaneous Math | 5 | 2018-02-05 05:20 |
20th Test of primality and factorization of Lepore with Pythagorean triples | Alberico Lepore | Alberico Lepore | 43 | 2018-01-17 15:55 |
18th Test of primality and factorization of Lepore in 5 * log_25 (N) (New Year's algorithm) | Alberico Lepore | Alberico Lepore | 2 | 2018-01-01 21:31 |
14° Primality test and factorization of Lepore ( conjecture ) | Alberico Lepore | Alberico Lepore | 48 | 2017-12-30 09:43 |