![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2·2,897 Posts |
![]()
I am currently writing an outline for a historical essay on fermat's last theorem. Can anyone explain to me vaguely what sort of complex integers Cauchy and Lamé needed a proof of unique factorization for to solve the flaw in their proofs? The best refence to what they needed I can find is "certain kinds of complex numbers". I assume they didn't just need a proof for just gaussian integers as I can find several reasonably trivial proofs of that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Mar 2010
On front of my laptop
7×17 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
16A216 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
abc conjecture and Fermat's Last Theorem | jasong | jasong | 3 | 2012-10-24 08:45 |
Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem | McPogor | Miscellaneous Math | 18 | 2007-10-19 11:40 |
Fermat's Last Theorem: a new hope | ET_ | Math | 36 | 2005-11-10 22:15 |
Fermat's Theorem | Crook | Math | 5 | 2005-05-05 17:18 |
Fermat,s Theorem | devarajkandadai | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2004-06-05 10:15 |