![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·3·5·311 Posts |
![]()
This is a test of the visualization for the remaining composites at a glance, using FactorDB*. Comfortably, this post will hardly need any maintenance (after initial set-up). Everyone is free to fix omissions in FactorDB!
It is important to remember that the content may be out of date with the real Cunningham Tables and that all work reservations an reports go to their maintainer. Table 2- | Table 2+ | Table 2LM Table 3- | Table 3+ | Table 3LM (extension to 1800) Table 5- | Table 5+ | Table 5LM Table 6- | Table 6+ | Table 6LM Table 7- | Table 7+ | Table 7LM Table 10-| Table 10+| Table 10LM Table 11-| Table 11+| Table 11LM Table 12-| Table 12+| Table 12LM Well, this is only a test. Please discuss below. *FactorDB is a brainchild of Markus Tervooren (known as Syd). There is a separate thread for reference. Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2010-06-12 at 20:02 Reason: added extended 3LM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
933010 Posts |
![]()
Alternative split view for 2+
Table 2+ (odd) | Table 2+ (even) P.S. Need to think how to make extra LMs (3s and 6s are done, but there are some left in others). Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2011-11-20 at 08:13 Reason: test FactorDB API v.2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Mar 2006
Germany
1011001111012 Posts |
![]()
that's what i'm thought of:
one click and you can see, which numbers are not factored yet. and the Cxx without searching some other tables/pages! BTW: i never had in mind to use the FactorDB in first and omit the Cunningham-pages! Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2009-08-14 at 09:07 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
100100011100102 Posts |
![]()
FactorDB has a problem by not knowing Aurifeuillian factorizations internally.
For example for 2LM tables, the attempt to separate 2L and 2M (in order to see what is left to be done) fails miserably. Example: FactorDB knows all factors of 2^1614+1, but it cannot produce factors of 2^807+2^404+1 and 2^807-2^404+1. But ask it to factorize (2^807+2^404+1)*(2^807-2^404+1) and it will! (It will do the math and will look up the resulting number 2^1614+1 in its numeric value.) So, it's not immediately ready for this trick in full. For now, I've simply sent lookups to 2^(4*n+2)+1, where L and M parts are mixed together. This is inconvenient. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
![]()
So why don't you post and request that it learn Aurifeuillian factorizations?
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthr...=11119&page=10 I wouldn't expect it to happen very soon since it's transitioning to a major update, and I expect Syd will have more urgent issues than that, but might as well request it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
100000000002 Posts |
![]()
So once the database finshes reloading, is there a
recommended pointer on submitting prime factors? My first report depends upon the factoring method; (Cunningham) gmp-ecm factors go to the ECMNET quick-start cgi, and PaulZ sends an email to the ecmnet list, which includes Sam. (Cunningham) sieving factors are usually reported directly to Sam, by whichever co-worker ran the matrix (Greg, Tom and Serge for large matrices, or myself for smaller ones). My second report has been going either here or to one of the other forum threads (factoring, ecmnet, nfsnet). Sounds like I ought to be submitting to the DB second, and noting that if/when I post a notice and/or info on the relevant forum thread. So once the hungry DB has been fed, I'd hope people take the time to look over Cunningham ecm progress on PaulZ's page (top10; or quick-start then by_date) and over-all progress from Sam's pages. Keeping the DB current should most likely be done by reading in entires from Sam's pages, especially "the most recent page" link. Then we can continue tracking history and specific content in the individual tables here; depending upon interest(s). -bd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Mar 2006
Germany
3·7·137 Posts |
![]() Quote:
only give the factorization as "Composite = Factor1 * Factor2 * ..." will insert it in the DB. no need to specify a special b^n+/-1 for instance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×3×5×311 Posts |
![]()
I've now reused the 2LM simple (but not precise) URLs for other LMs.
Note the c400 and c373 in Table 5LM - these are fairly easily algebraically split into two composites each. Left as an exercise to the reader! (The solution is easy if a bit cumbersome, just start from L and M forms conveniently found in the main table after each section.) P.S. yes, I did make a suggestion in the other subforum, but I know how busy Syd may be, especially now. So it is formulated in such a way that can take away a burden from him and place it on a submitter (who can submit them as a | b). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
102410 Posts |
![]() Quote:
on the 6+ thread), which I incorrectly read as a reply. Sounds like the DB is partly intended as the (n+1)st factorization function (cf. gmp-ecm posts about "complete" factorizations, rather than "find a factor and stop"). Especially useful for locating the hard part of an un-tested input. I'm usually mostly muterring about what to do with given known hard composites. On reporting factors found, and locating someone else's recently found factor ... Just curious, suppose I can wait until I have a factor to report; does filing a report require registration/login? I see that there's provision for pasting in gmp-ecm and msieve reports, which settles that, as far as I'm concerned. If you had been replying to either my or Andi47's post, and I'd submitted my new factor to the DB, is there a DB provision for browsing recently submitted Cunningham factors, resp., factors recently submitted to one of the 16 tables, such as 6+? The tables you've suggested, as Serge is working on above, immediately drop a number such as the C216 cofactor of 6, 304+ upon submitting the report, as someone did for my p78. This happened to be a "first hole" (the trad. Cunningham term, along with "first five holes"), so upon submitting the p78, the 6+ table changes by dropping the first entry (for 304+), and starting with ... oops, the link you posted has already expired ... presumably due to the recent updating? Well, anyway, clicking on Serge's link, I get ... (starting with) 6, 314+. And on my previous point, doesn't my submitting the p78 mean that DB users have the factor and/or updated list of remaining composite cofactors, without being bothered with (and/or "informed by") info on the factoring method --- i.e., either the Step 1 limit and sigma of the elliptic curve, for ecm, or snfs -vs- gnfs for a sieving report? Much less mention of Lehigh's contribution of the cputime; and not to mention my own (and my co-factorer's) effort. I haven't gotten to looking yet, but unless the DB intention is to reduce the info that had been available (not as fluently, perhaps, but available) by looking on PaulZ's ECMNET page (quick-start ...) or Sam's page (most recent page ...), there ought to be some sort of flag or link as to where to look for further info (method, factorer, _DATE_, history &etc). Quote:
Thanks & Regards, Bruce |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Mar 2006
Germany
3·7·137 Posts |
![]()
the Factoring Database is only for collecting factorizations of a wide range of numbers.
there's (by now) no option to display the name of the submitter/calculater nor data like B1-values of an ECM-found, sigmas or dates. although this new verison of the DB user-logins are possible, this is only for collecting 'points' to using the workers (PC's from the DB or other users) for factoring. Markus (the programmer) has done a great work the last months with this database, which was the first one ever collecting factors. there're many (and quite very special) sites with showing factorizations of numbers. but nobody ever tried to combine all in one. if you wish such data should be also found in this DB, ask him! perhaps more data could be shown then here. as i mentioned, that DB should not replace any other tables with quite more and specialised data. it's only to have a quick look for a certain factorization without first surching that corresponding page in the www! BTW: - |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PRPs that are composites | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 57 | 2011-09-12 12:31 |
false composites with LLR | Thomas11 | Riesel Prime Search | 32 | 2008-11-20 21:04 |
New ECM Effort Tables for Cunningham Composites Ready | garo | Factoring | 12 | 2005-09-06 07:53 |
Primes and composites | mfgoode | Miscellaneous Math | 12 | 2005-07-05 19:19 |
Introduction: ECM work done on Cunningham Project composites | garo | Cunningham Tables | 2 | 2005-01-20 10:06 |