Any way to avoid these?

LOBES · 2021-01-03, 02:07

Today I got and completed an assignment from GPU72 (exponent: 106757051)

I would much rather put my GPU cycles towards exponents that haven't already had a C-PRP and CERT completed on them. I didn't use the Double Check form, I used the regular TF for LL Candidates form.

I'm hoping to eliminate possible exponents from needing these tests. Any way to flag these during assignment so I don't get more of them?

Runtime Error · 2021-01-03, 03:09

Sorry!!! I somehow managed to miss testing a bit level.

GPU-72 isn't to blame. It's my fault. I must have signed up for the whole range and then proceeded to not complete it. Also, I like the odyssey of performing the complete test from TF to P1 to PRP. It's a fun journey for me, I apologise for breaking assignment rules.

LOBES · 2021-01-03, 06:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runtime Error

Sorry!!! I somehow managed to miss testing a bit level.

GPU-72 isn't to blame. It's my fault. I must have signed up for the whole range and then proceeded to not complete it. Also, I like the odyssey of performing the complete test from TF to P1 to PRP. It's a fun journey for me, I apologise for breaking assignment rules.

No problem...that makes sense. I think there are more though...just got assigned this one: 106757039.

I think I'll unreserve it. Are you able to tell how many might have been caught up in this?

Runtime Error · 2021-01-04, 01:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOBES

Are you able to tell how many might have been caught up in this?

Yes, there are four exponents where I missed the 74th bit level.

106757039
106757051
106757081
106757141

If any of the aggrieved parties would like me to submit some TF work in their name as compensation, please let me know, I am happy to do so.

LOBES · 2021-01-04, 02:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runtime Error

If any of the aggrieved parties would like me to submit some TF work in their name as compensation, please let me know, I am happy to do so.

Certainly no need for that in my case. I still got 35.8388 GHz days of credit for the work.

Thanks for following up.

2021-01-03, 02:07	#1
LOBES Mar 2019 USA 3×17 Posts	Any way to avoid these? Today I got and completed an assignment from GPU72 (exponent: 106757051) I would much rather put my GPU cycles towards exponents that haven't already had a C-PRP and CERT completed on them. I didn't use the Double Check form, I used the regular TF for LL Candidates form. I'm hoping to eliminate possible exponents from needing these tests. Any way to flag these during assignment so I don't get more of them?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Avoid ”Restarting all worker windows using new settings.“	Ensigm	PrimeNet	6	2020-12-05 13:03
Avoid word repetition	henryzz	Lounge	48	2020-12-01 17:17
Throttle CPU to avoid fan noise in the daytime	username	PrimeNet	4	2019-02-19 16:22
Using geometry to avoid calculus	davieddy	Puzzles	6	2007-09-18 10:00

2021-01-03, 03:09	#2
Runtime Error Sep 2017 USA 5·47 Posts	Sorry!!! I somehow managed to miss testing a bit level. GPU-72 isn't to blame. It's my fault. I must have signed up for the whole range and then proceeded to not complete it. Also, I like the odyssey of performing the complete test from TF to P1 to PRP. It's a fun journey for me, I apologise for breaking assignment rules.