mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Puzzles

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-12-30, 14:09   #1
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

7,577 Posts
Default January 2019

http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/po...nuary2019.html
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 14:48   #2
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyzzy View Post
I understand why the original numbers work but I don't see too much in the way of extending the problem. edit: okay I see one flaw with the original numbers.

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-12-30 at 15:00
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 17:47   #3
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

3×617 Posts
Default

Here we go again with empty sets and semi empty sets.
Different conventions, conflictingly different solutions.
Makes the challenge flawed in my opinion.

Are primes products of distinct primes?
I would say not, but know of Wikipedia worshippers which would disagree.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 17:58   #4
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

20C016 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
Here we go again with empty sets and semi empty sets.
Different conventions, conflictingly different solutions.
Makes the challenge flawed in my opinion.

Are primes products of distinct primes?
I would say not, but know of Wikipedia worshippers which would disagree.
take the individual sums if you look at them you'll find your answer.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 18:14   #5
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

34738 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
take the individual sums if you look at them you'll find your answer.
I disagree.

If Primes are products of distinct primes then:

4 > 2 > 1
25 > 5 > 1
100 > 20 > 4 > 2 > 1
121 > 11 > 1

Bob wins.

Else if Primes are-not products of distinct primes then:

4, 25 and 121 have no winners so Alice will have the only choice of choosing 100 and then:

100 > 10 > 1

Bob wins.

Last fiddled with by a1call on 2018-12-30 at 18:16
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 18:59   #6
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

838410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
I disagree.

If Primes are products of distinct primes then:

4 > 2 > 1
25 > 5 > 1
100 > 20 > 4 > 2 > 1
121 > 11 > 1

Bob wins.

Else if Primes are-not products of distinct primes then:

4, 25 and 121 have no winners so Alice will have the only choice of choosing 100 and then:

100 > 10 > 1

Bob wins.
false if the sum is a prime square, the only way not to repeat primes is for Alice to take the sqrt and Bob to divide by the sqrt a second time.

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-12-30 at 19:00
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 19:19   #7
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

3×617 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
false if the sum is a prime square, the only way not to repeat primes is for Alice to take the sqrt and Bob to divide by the sqrt a second time.
What exactly are you referring to when you say false?
Please be more specific. Thanks.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 19:25   #8
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

203008 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
What exactly are you referring to when you say false?
Please be more specific. Thanks.
you're just arguing that because you can assume a bunch of cases don't work that it's ambiguous. it's not. you can complain to the puzzlemaster you know.

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-12-30 at 19:25
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 19:29   #9
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

3×617 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
you're just arguing that because you can assume a bunch of cases don't work that it's ambiguous. it's not. you can complain to the puzzlemaster you know.
I am saying that two different conventions will both work and that's why the challenge is vague.
And frankly I don't need you to let me know if I can or can not raise the issue with anyone.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 19:38   #10
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
I am saying that two different conventions will both work and that's why the challenge is vague.
And frankly I don't need you to let me know if I can or can not raise the issue with anyone.
many different conventions work in code as well, you don't complain about that. my point is if you want it to be unvague you can get an explanation from the puzzlemaster not here.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-30, 23:41   #11
SmartMersenne
 
Sep 2017

23×32 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
Here we go again with empty sets and semi empty sets.
Different conventions, conflictingly different solutions.
Makes the challenge flawed in my opinion.

Are primes products of distinct primes?
I would say not, but know of Wikipedia worshippers which would disagree.
1 is NOT a prime by definition. The smallest prime is 2.

So primes are NOT a product of distinct primes, because a product is defined by at least 2 terms.
SmartMersenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2019 Coding Challenge miroslavkures Number Theory Discussion Group 2 2018-12-27 08:59
January 2018 Xyzzy Puzzles 0 2018-01-02 03:09
January 2017 Xyzzy Puzzles 4 2017-02-22 21:34
January 2016 R. Gerbicz Puzzles 17 2016-02-04 17:00
January 2015 Xyzzy Puzzles 1 2015-02-02 17:17

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:07.

Fri Aug 7 13:07:20 UTC 2020 up 21 days, 8:54, 1 user, load averages: 2.48, 2.57, 2.41

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.