![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Sep 2004
13·41 Posts |
![]()
I assume the best way to test K*2^n + 3 or + 5 is prp-with llr. What is the format to use? I was able to figure out how to get it to do -1 and +1 by copying the newpgen output for a +1 or -1 sieve. Thanks!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sep 2004
10258 Posts |
![]()
It seems I should be able to use ABC format, like
ABC $a*2^34000+3 //+1 and -1 didn't work either. 61570182 430131372 ... But it doesn't seem to work. EDIT: Found this seems to work. However it was slower than pfgw, about 25% as slow actually. Instead of like 3.2 something seconds each its 4.2 something. ABC $a*2^$b+3 61570182 34000 430131372 34000 Maybe I'm doing something wrong? LLR and Proth take 1.2-1.5 seconds, with LLR program. Also I discovered that ABC $a*2^$b+5 LLR does in the same fast 1.5 seconds, whereas pfgw again takes 3.2. I suspect it is because I was testing +3 and +5 instead of +5 and +7? Last fiddled with by Joshua2 on 2009-01-25 at 01:43 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
4,861 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Luigi |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help me make a superhero | jasong | jasong | 4 | 2016-05-27 01:44 |
I make music | Orgasmic Troll | Hobbies | 9 | 2010-06-19 04:34 |
Would this make people mad? | jasong | Information & Answers | 2 | 2007-11-01 06:26 |
You just can't make it up. | xilman | Lounge | 11 | 2006-10-06 22:36 |
Yet another problem to make you think. | Uncwilly | Puzzles | 3 | 2005-05-27 20:37 |