20211112, 09:45  #1 
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
2^{4}·3^{2}·7 Posts 
timeless math is
Hi all,
In my opinion, mathematical structure is more timeless than the physical universe. To quote my own web page, Even after the closest stars burn out and become dark, mathematical structure will exist. For example 1+1=2 is a timeless mathematical truth. This fact will always be so. see mattanderson.fun Regards, Matt 
20211112, 10:09  #2  
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3×1,327 Posts 
Quote:


20211112, 10:56  #3 
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
2^{4}·3^{2}·7 Posts 
Okay, good point. By that time, I would be dead. But, the prime numbers would not change.

20211112, 14:04  #5  
Feb 2017
Nowhere
2×5^{2}×107 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
At some time in the past  perhaps 100,000 years ago  there were modern humans, but nothing of mathematics on earth. Further back, there were no humans. So I would say there is such a thing as time before mathematics. And what about the future? Never mind the stars burning out. And let us cheerfully ignore the prospect that in five billion years or so, Mr. Sun will turn into a red giant and incinerate the earth. Long before that, astrophysics tells us that in the hundred million year time range, Mr. Sun will become bright enough that the earth will be too hot for us to live on. Eventually it might develop a climate similar to that of Venus. But let us look at the interim  humanity wiped out, but its works left behind. There will be many books and journals devoted to mathematics sitting on library shelves. But with nobody left to read and understand the mathematics written in them, I claim that the mathematics would no longer exist. I see two ways to claim that mathematics is "timeless." One way is to claim that numbers have "a life of their own," irrespective of there being any beings capable of thinking about them. Another would be to claim that time itself has no existence apart from human experience of it  that is, there is no such thing as the universe before people, and no such thing as the universe after people. I do not subscribe to either notion. Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 20211112 at 14:05 Reason: w 

20211112, 16:24  #6 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
17D6_{16} Posts 
Reality is that which exists independently of whether we believe in it or not, or whether we have beliefs, or whether we are capable of observing change or anything, or whether we or other sentient species exist. Physical and chemical processes occur. The processes follow discoverable principles and laws, independently of discovery date, language, etc. Sol appears to move through the sky, but Earth spins on its axis creating that appearance to an occupant of Earth's surface. The elliptical orbit and axis inclination relative to it create seasons and a count of sunsets measures the year. Similarly during local terrestrial darkness, Luna can be observed to go through phases. Analogous dynamics occur relative to some other planets, moons, and stars. Exoplanet discoveries are consistent with variations of that. The mathematical description of orbital mechanics apply whether an astronomical body or system is inhabited with life or not.
Behavior of other terrestrial species is consistent with some level of awareness of seasons and time of day. There's also experimental evidence that some other species can count and compare numbers. Not only primates, either. Even bees and venus flytraps apparently count. https://www.livescience.com/61084ca...alscount.html This question of whether mathematics exists independent of an observer or interpreter reminds me of Schrodinger's cat or the sound of a tree falling. How many cats are in the box, if Schrodinger is unaware of it/them/the box? The cat(s) may know how many are there, even if Schrodinger does not exist, and even if the cats do not call such awareness or counting, mathematics. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20211112 at 16:29 
20211112, 19:12  #7 
"刀比日"
May 2018
13·19 Posts 
In our universe, we count in increments of 1 so that
1 + 1 = 2 (counting), 1 + 1 => 3 (synergy, creation, or holistic approach, like two closed loops that have a joint edge form three closed loops), and 1 + 1 => 0 (dysergy, or destruction, like the annihilation of a particle and its antiparticle with the release of energy). Imagine an alternative universe, in which for some reason the fabric of said universe produces a third element in the presence of two initial elements and 1 + 1 = 3. Would the sentient beings there have a notion of 2, or their counting would be 1, 3,...? 
20211112, 20:33  #8 
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
1760_{8} Posts 
platonic love
I know what platonic love is. It is like love
for your sister. This is as opposed to romantic love. Some people fall in love with their area of study. I took my education to the master's degree level. I also did some teaching. And I delayed flirt because I was studying. But now I am happily married. I have a dog and a step grand son. So god has smiled upon me more than most. In other words, I am a lucky guy. But that doesn't answer the question I say that mathematical structure exists. Much of math can be proved to be correct. Some people say that the know their 'times tables, but I bet that most high school graduates do not know that 6*8 = 48. In my opinion that is the most sexy mathematical fact in the one digit multiplication table. My dad taught me a Latin word  funiculum  literally "slender rope" but he said it is the written fraction bar. It goes between a numerator and a denominator like in 5/8. My dad also showed me the webpage APOD (Astronomy Picture of the Day) and I still like that. My dad was a good guy and he died in 2015. But most people put things in a different order than me. Lots of people get married at about age 25. see this reliable statistic I will not try to defend my view from all other opinions in this web log. Thank you for your input everybody. Matt 
20211112, 21:28  #9 
Mar 2016
3·5^{3} Posts 
I think the existence of prime numbers has started one nanosecond before time has started.
Last fiddled with by bhelmes on 20211112 at 21:29 
20211112, 21:34  #10 
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
2^{4}·3^{2}·7 Posts 
Hi again all,
I read a little bit from the Wikipedia article about 'theory of forms' from Plato. So, from my understanding, it was written that there is a "visible form" or a "shape". Our five senses add emphasis to this. Here is a quote from the paragraph about Intelligible realm and separation of the Forms In the Phaedrus the Forms are in a "place beyond heaven" (huperouranios topos) (Phdr. 247c ff); and in the Republic the sensible world is contrasted with the intelligible realm (noēton topon) in the famous Allegory of the Cave. I got very excited about the Allegory of the Cave when I was in high school. Basically, you can learn new things that you don't get from your family. Place beyond heaven sounds like a time before all time. It doesn't make sense to me. I can relate to intelligible realm as it relates to original research. I did calculations for the first time with Prime Constellations, and so did Dana Jacobson and so did Norman Luhn. It is great to be able to add a bit of knowledge to humankind. Even every member of GIMPS who finds a negative result on a Mersenne Prime is adding to "what we know". This is new to me. Thanks for the Wikipedia link. Regards, Matt 
20211112, 21:48  #11  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
23710_{8} Posts 
Quote:
Only when I was first introduced to the Doubleslit experient did my mind begin to understand that it couldn't (by definition) know everything. I've been working to recover from this revelation ever since (in a good way)... Oh... Also... We still aren't sure if QU is part of consciousness... 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
I am so sorry for being bad at math.  Aramis Wyler  Math  40  20141218 11:15 
need some math help.  swl551  Math  2  20140220 16:33 
Math  ET_  Operazione Doppi Mersennes  4  20120920 19:33 
A timeless moment....  mdettweiler  Forum Feedback  15  20081021 19:01 
math help pls!  DSC  Miscellaneous Math  2  20050911 04:53 