mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > gophne

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-01-01, 07:20   #133
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

3×43×79 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gophne View Post
I acknowledge that "my" algorithm is a "clone" of Fermat.
If I may please say, you are quite possibly the funniest AI we've ever had here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gophne View Post
All I can do now is to provide the background work that I had used to derive "my" algorithm, if anybody might be interested. I did not use Fermat.
No need.

Any high-school student worth their salt would have parsed your language, and your maths, in their head.
chalsall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 10:44   #134
guptadeva
 
Dec 2017

2×52 Posts
Default

eucleides is said to have replied to king ptolemaios' request for an easy way of learning mathematics: "THERE IS NO ROYAL WAY TO MATHEMATICS"

as an unnknown greek translator once joked, the quote of euclid could also be interpreted as "THERE IS NO WAY MORE ROYAL THAN THE MATHEMATICS"

as far as i know ptolemaios assured eucleides that he would study hard and not make any shortcuts ...

eucleides did in fact teach ptolemaios some simple mathematics as he perfectly understood the future value of this - it had been a longstanding dream of eucleides that a library in alexandria be build - so after having taught ptolemaios to appreciate the value of science, a library was build in alexandria with support from ptolemaios.

also eratosthenes, later working in the library of alexandria as the chief librarian had enough time to sift through the huge ammount of precious scientific works collected there

euceides never taught any geometry to ptolemaios ... but that's another story ...

Last fiddled with by guptadeva on 2018-01-01 at 11:35 Reason: grammar
guptadeva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 11:42   #135
gophne
 
Feb 2017

3·5·11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
If I may please say, you are quite possibly the funniest AI we've ever had here.



No need.

Any high-school student worth their salt would have parsed your language, and your maths, in their head.
Hi chalsall

You point is taken.

I think you came from your mothers womb already filled with wisdom and magnanimity, because it is shining from you like a fiery beacon.

You are a colossus of a human being....there are and never will be anybody like you that will walk on this earth.

You must enjoy and never forget or let others forget this very special gift that you have been born with.

Go well.
gophne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 12:05   #136
gophne
 
Feb 2017

3×5×11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guptadeva View Post
eucleides is said to have replied to king ptolemaios' request for an easy way of learning mathematics: "THERE IS NO ROYAL WAY TO MATHEMATICS"

as an unnknown greek translator once joked, the quote of euclid could also be interpreted as "THERE IS NO WAY MORE ROYAL THAN THE MATHEMATICS"

as far as i know ptolemaios assured eucleides that he would study hard and not make any shortcuts ...

eucleides did in fact teach ptolemaios some simple mathematics as he perfectly understood the future value of this - it had been a longstanding dream of eucleides that a library in alexandria be build - so after having taught ptolemaios to appreciate the value of science, a library was build in alexandria with support from ptolemaios.

also eratosthenes, later working in the library of alexandria as the chief librarian had enough time to sift through the huge ammount of precious scientific works collected there

euceides never taught any geometry to ptolemaios ... but that's another story ...
Thanks.....the embarassment runs deep, but I take heart from your message. I supposed the history of maths is littered with all kinds of wanna-be's like myself. But then again, lots of knowledge must have been born in fits of insanity...unfortunately for me this was not one of those times :(

However, prime search is my hobby....and I will continue to search....and hopefully I will not be pre-judged by this faux pas...there could be many more.

I will post on this thread, once the thunder has passed, the background work from which I derived the formula that I had posted, which was not from Fermat.

Until then I will keep as low a profile as possible.

Regards
gophne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 14:34   #137
guptadeva
 
Dec 2017

2·52 Posts
Default

re-stating some of your quotes:

Quote:
I will post on this thread, once the thunder has passed,
the background work from which I derived the formula that I had posted

it involves an (elusive) prime relationship
time O(log n)
If authenticated, will compare to simplicity of Euclid's Proof for Infinite number of Primes
well, it was just a thunder in a water-glass so to say.
so i would still be interested to know more about
the method itself that led to your discovery

you managed to formulate a conclusion of your method in terms of
the mod function and this conclusion is equivalent to another conclusion of fermat

yet from your quotes i would deduce, that your original
method implies looking at some groups of the digits of
a number n ?

or do you just systematically play with numbers
on a computer and are able to spot interesting patterns
as the emerge ?

btw. fermat made quite a lot of hasty conclusions that were later proven to be wrong
(simple counter-examples), but this do not diminish his work ...
it just shows the necessity of formal proofs.
guptadeva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 14:40   #138
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guptadeva View Post
re-stating some of your quotes:



well, it was just a thunder in a water-glass so to say.
so i would still be interested to know more about
the method itself that led to your discovery

you managed to formulate a conclusion of your method in terms of
the mod function and this conclusion is equivalent to another conclusion of fermat

yet from your quotes i would deduce, that your original
method implies looking at some groups of the digits of
a number n ?

or do you just systematically play with numbers
on a computer and are able to spot interesting patterns
as the emerge ?

btw. fermat made quite a lot of hasty conclusions that were later proven to be wrong
(simple counter-examples), but this do not diminish his work ...
it just shows the necessity of formal proofs.
Not to mention this is on of an infinite number of equivalents to Fermat's base 2 test.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 15:21   #139
guptadeva
 
Dec 2017

3216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
Not to mention this is on of an infinite number of equivalents to Fermat's base 2 test.
elementary my dear watson: all of these infinite number of tests are equivalent, yet some are more equivalent than others

Last fiddled with by guptadeva on 2018-01-01 at 15:23 Reason: typo
guptadeva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 17:40   #140
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"๐’‰บ๐’ŒŒ๐’‡ท๐’†ท๐’€ญ"
May 2003
Down not across

3×5×743 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gophne View Post
Hi chalsall

You point is taken.

I think you came from your mothers womb already filled with wisdom and magnanimity, because it is shining from you like a fiery beacon.

You are a colossus of a human being....there are and never will be anybody like you that will walk on this earth.

You must enjoy and never forget or let others forget this very special gift that you have been born with.

Go well.
Flattery will get you everywhere.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 17:56   #141
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guptadeva View Post
elementary my dear watson: all of these infinite number of tests are equivalent, yet some are more equivalent than others
And some could tell properties of n such that Mn have specific k in their divisors.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 18:30   #142
guptadeva
 
Dec 2017

2·52 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
And some could tell properties of n such that Mn have specific k in their divisors.
you are giving so many hints, dear sherlock
guptadeva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-01, 19:31   #143
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

20C016 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guptadeva View Post
you are giving so many hints, dear sherlock
Do they really count as hints if the person might not decipher them ?
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gpuOwL: an OpenCL program for Mersenne primality testing preda GpuOwl 2751 2022-01-03 14:57
GQQ: a "deterministic" "primality" test in O(ln n)^2 Chair Zhuang Miscellaneous Math 21 2018-03-26 22:33
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" wildrabbitt Miscellaneous Math 11 2015-03-06 08:17
"New primality proving test from Alex Petrov" ewmayer Math 11 2007-04-23 19:07
P-1 B1/B2 selection with "Test=" vs "Pfactor=" James Heinrich Software 2 2005-03-19 21:58

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:23.


Mon Jan 24 14:23:00 UTC 2022 up 185 days, 8:51, 0 users, load averages: 1.23, 1.32, 1.41

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

โ‰  ยฑ โˆ“ รท ร— ยท โˆ’ โˆš โ€ฐ โŠ— โŠ• โŠ– โŠ˜ โŠ™ โ‰ค โ‰ฅ โ‰ฆ โ‰ง โ‰จ โ‰ฉ โ‰บ โ‰ป โ‰ผ โ‰ฝ โŠ โŠ โŠ‘ โŠ’ ยฒ ยณ ยฐ
โˆ  โˆŸ ยฐ โ‰… ~ โ€– โŸ‚ โซ›
โ‰ก โ‰œ โ‰ˆ โˆ โˆž โ‰ช โ‰ซ โŒŠโŒ‹ โŒˆโŒ‰ โˆ˜ โˆ โˆ โˆ‘ โˆง โˆจ โˆฉ โˆช โจ€ โŠ• โŠ— ๐–• ๐–– ๐–— โŠฒ โŠณ
โˆ… โˆ– โˆ โ†ฆ โ†ฃ โˆฉ โˆช โŠ† โŠ‚ โŠ„ โŠŠ โŠ‡ โŠƒ โŠ… โŠ‹ โŠ– โˆˆ โˆ‰ โˆ‹ โˆŒ โ„• โ„ค โ„š โ„ โ„‚ โ„ต โ„ถ โ„ท โ„ธ ๐“Ÿ
ยฌ โˆจ โˆง โŠ• โ†’ โ† โ‡’ โ‡ โ‡” โˆ€ โˆƒ โˆ„ โˆด โˆต โŠค โŠฅ โŠข โŠจ โซค โŠฃ โ€ฆ โ‹ฏ โ‹ฎ โ‹ฐ โ‹ฑ
โˆซ โˆฌ โˆญ โˆฎ โˆฏ โˆฐ โˆ‡ โˆ† ฮด โˆ‚ โ„ฑ โ„’ โ„“
๐›ข๐›ผ ๐›ฃ๐›ฝ ๐›ค๐›พ ๐›ฅ๐›ฟ ๐›ฆ๐œ€๐œ– ๐›ง๐œ ๐›จ๐œ‚ ๐›ฉ๐œƒ๐œ— ๐›ช๐œ„ ๐›ซ๐œ… ๐›ฌ๐œ† ๐›ญ๐œ‡ ๐›ฎ๐œˆ ๐›ฏ๐œ‰ ๐›ฐ๐œŠ ๐›ฑ๐œ‹ ๐›ฒ๐œŒ ๐›ด๐œŽ ๐›ต๐œ ๐›ถ๐œ ๐›ท๐œ™๐œ‘ ๐›ธ๐œ’ ๐›น๐œ“ ๐›บ๐œ”