mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-10-26, 08:30   #34
mackerel
 
mackerel's Avatar
 
Feb 2016
UK

5×79 Posts
Default

Because laptops have limited upgrade potential I think they want to leave the other slot free so the user can expand without having to partially remove existing. If custom configured I think many companies allow the option of dual channel vs single.

In my personal laptop it came with 1x8GB module. I put in another one taken from a deceased laptop, gives a nice boost. Modules are mismatched but still give dual channel operation (2400 single rank + 2133 dual rank!).
mackerel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-26, 22:28   #35
simon389
 
Aug 2013

5·17 Posts
Default

With quad channel RAM, how much faster percentage wise is LL world record crunching on Skylake X vs some thing like Coffee Lake?
simon389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-27, 20:17   #36
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

55458 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon389 View Post
With quad channel RAM, how much faster percentage wise is LL world record crunching on Skylake X vs some thing like Coffee Lake?
Depends on RAM speed, ranks, core speed, and core count.

But given that RAM is usually the bottleneck, double the RAM should give about double the throughput with double the cores.

The best value is still the low cost quad core systems with fast dual rank RAM: it's cheaper to build two quad core systems than one octocore system with quad channel RAM due to motherboard and CPU costs.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-28, 08:07   #37
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

7·292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
it's cheaper to build two quad core systems than one octocore system with quad channel RAM due to motherboard and CPU costs.
To build, okay. To run? Don't forget about the electricity cost. If you run it 24/7 at 100% then those costs add up. It's double for two systems.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-28, 13:16   #38
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

52·172 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
To build, okay. To run? Don't forget about the electricity cost. If you run it 24/7 at 100% then those costs add up. It's double for two systems.
Actually SkylakeX burns more than twice as much electricity as two of my 4-core systems.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-30, 04:01   #39
simon389
 
Aug 2013

8510 Posts
Default Strange benchmark scores

A few RAM benchmarks of interest:

OLD i5 4690K @ stock 3.5Ghz with 16GB (4GBx4) 2400Mhz DDR3 RAM

Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.35 ms. Throughput: 230.05 iter/sec.
Timings for 2304K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.78 ms. Throughput: 209.00 iter/sec.
Timings for 2400K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.90 ms. Throughput: 203.89 iter/sec
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.21 ms. Throughput: 191.78 iter/sec.
Timings for 2688K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.76 ms. Throughput: 173.55 iter/sec.
Timings for 2880K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.93 ms. Throughput: 168.57 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.61 ms. Throughput: 151.36 iter/sec.
Timings for 3200K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.75 ms. Throughput: 148.04 iter/sec.
Timings for 3360K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.27 ms. Throughput: 137.64 iter/sec.
Timings for 3456K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.47 ms. Throughput: 133.79 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.77 ms. Throughput: 128.73 iter/sec.
Timings for 3840K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 8.45 ms. Throughput: 118.30 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 8.57 ms. Throughput: 116.64 iter/sec.
Timings for 4480K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.36 ms. Throughput: 106.81 iter/sec.
Timings for 4608K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.96 ms. Throughput: 100.41 iter/sec.
Timings for 4800K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 10.19 ms. Throughput: 98.12 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 11.15 ms. Throughput: 89.69 iter/sec.
Timings for 5376K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 11.97 ms. Throughput: 83.53 iter/sec.
Timings for 5760K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 12.94 ms. Throughput: 77.29 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 13.08 ms. Throughput: 76.46 iter/sec.
Timings for 6400K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 14.38 ms. Throughput: 69.54 iter/sec.
Timings for 6720K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 14.89 ms. Throughput: 67.18 iter/sec.
Timings for 6912K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 15.10 ms. Throughput: 66.21 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 15.91 ms. Throughput: 62.86 iter/sec.
Timings for 7680K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 16.93 ms. Throughput: 59.07 iter/sec.
Timings for 8064K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 18.22 ms. Throughput: 54.87 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 18.80 ms. Throughput: 53.20 iter/sec.

NEW i5 9600K @ stock 3.7Ghz with 32GB (16GBx2) of DDR4 3600Mhz:

Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.07 ms. Throughput: 483.82 iter/sec.
Timings for 2304K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.30 ms. Throughput: 434.59 iter/sec.
Timings for 2400K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.43 ms. Throughput: 411.18 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.67 ms. Throughput: 374.39 iter/sec.
Timings for 2688K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.79 ms. Throughput: 358.41 iter/sec.
Timings for 2880K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.02 ms. Throughput: 330.90 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.26 ms. Throughput: 306.33 iter/sec.
Timings for 3200K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.37 ms. Throughput: 296.88 iter/sec.
Timings for 3360K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.68 ms. Throughput: 271.65 iter/sec.
Timings for 3456K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.71 ms. Throughput: 269.45 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.84 ms. Throughput: 260.69 iter/sec.
Timings for 3840K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.17 ms. Throughput: 239.54 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.45 ms. Throughput: 224.57 iter/sec.
Timings for 4480K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.87 ms. Throughput: 205.14 iter/sec.
Timings for 4608K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.96 ms. Throughput: 201.74 iter/sec.
Timings for 4800K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.33 ms. Throughput: 187.67 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.64 ms. Throughput: 177.28 iter/sec.
Timings for 5376K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.99 ms. Throughput: 167.06 iter/sec.
Timings for 5760K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.45 ms. Throughput: 155.06 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.86 ms. Throughput: 145.75 iter/sec.
Timings for 6400K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.20 ms. Throughput: 138.97 iter/sec.
Timings for 6720K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.60 ms. Throughput: 131.62 iter/sec.
Timings for 6912K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.97 ms. Throughput: 125.52 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 8.16 ms. Throughput: 122.56 iter/sec.
Timings for 7680K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 8.68 ms. Throughput: 115.25 iter/sec.
Timings for 8064K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.27 ms. Throughput: 107.92 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.51 ms. Throughput: 105.17 iter/sec.

NEW i7 9700K @ stock 3.6Ghz with 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 4500Mhz (downclocked to 4360 Mhz for stability)

Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.12 ms. Throughput: 472.02 iter/sec.
Timings for 2304K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.45 ms. Throughput: 408.10 iter/sec.
Timings for 2400K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 2.57 ms. Throughput: 388.40 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.00 ms. Throughput: 333.33 iter/sec.
Timings for 2688K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.14 ms. Throughput: 318.78 iter/sec.
Timings for 2880K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.47 ms. Throughput: 288.44 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 3.78 ms. Throughput: 264.21 iter/sec.
Timings for 3200K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.03 ms. Throughput: 248.41 iter/sec.
Timings for 3360K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.33 ms. Throughput: 230.71 iter/sec.
Timings for 3456K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.44 ms. Throughput: 225.21 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 4.55 ms. Throughput: 219.63 iter/sec.
Timings for 3840K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.22 ms. Throughput: 191.70 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 5.40 ms. Throughput: 185.13 iter/sec.
Timings for 4480K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.13 ms. Throughput: 163.15 iter/sec.
Timings for 4608K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.40 ms. Throughput: 156.16 iter/sec.
Timings for 4800K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.88 ms. Throughput: 145.42 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 6.81 ms. Throughput: 146.79 iter/sec.
Timings for 5376K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.70 ms. Throughput: 129.84 iter/sec.
Timings for 5760K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.49 ms. Throughput: 133.53 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 7.92 ms. Throughput: 126.26 iter/sec.
Timings for 6400K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.55 ms. Throughput: 104.75 iter/sec.
Timings for 6720K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.02 ms. Throughput: 110.83 iter/sec.
Timings for 6912K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.41 ms. Throughput: 106.26 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 9.49 ms. Throughput: 105.43 iter/sec.
Timings for 7680K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 11.58 ms. Throughput: 86.34 iter/sec.
Timings for 8064K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 11.43 ms. Throughput: 87.51 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cores, 1 worker): 11.06 ms. Throughput: 90.43 iter/sec.

It is interesting to me that the 9600K actually performs 10-20% faster than the 9700K, even though the RAM is actually 800Mhz slower. That 4500Mhz RAM was expensive, and I thought it would make everything faster. But it did not. Is the 9600K faster because it's using dual rank RAM (16GB sticks)? Or is it the 100Mhz slower processor? Or both?

Last fiddled with by simon389 on 2018-10-30 at 04:17
simon389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-30, 15:14   #40
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

2,917 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon389 View Post
It is interesting to me that the 9600K actually performs 10-20% faster than the 9700K, even though the RAM is actually 800Mhz slower. That 4500Mhz RAM was expensive, and I thought it would make everything faster. But it did not. Is the 9600K faster because it's using dual rank RAM (16GB sticks)? Or is it the 100Mhz slower processor? Or both?
Probably. Dual rank usually makes a 10% to 15% difference from what I've seen.

When Prime95/mprime hits RAM, it hits it hard, faster than a single rank can operate.

Useful numbers for future reference. Thanks!
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-30, 17:08   #41
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

56508 Posts
Default

Try with CPU-Z to make sure both are running dual channel RAM:
https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html

On the "Memory" tab there is a "Channel #" that should say "Dual".

It seems weird to me that dual rank should be that much faster when the other RAM is higher clock rate, I read previously on the forum that dual rank only gave a few percent extra.

Did you try 6 cores 1 worker on both?

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2018-10-30 at 17:09
ATH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-30, 22:28   #42
simon389
 
Aug 2013

10101012 Posts
Default

CPU Z says it is dual. And yes, I tested it with 6 cores.

Last fiddled with by simon389 on 2018-10-30 at 22:44
simon389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-11-02, 08:55   #43
Lorenzo
 
Lorenzo's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus

22·43 Posts
Default

For me your result is not surprise. Latency matter! I'm sure that 4500 ram has huge values for CL and so on ...

But try to downgrade your 4500 kit to 3600 but for smallest CL as you can run in stable. Interesting to see the difference in this case.

Last fiddled with by Lorenzo on 2018-11-02 at 09:00
Lorenzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-26, 19:09   #44
Trilo
 
Trilo's Avatar
 
"W. Byerly"
Aug 2013
1423*2^2179023-1

2×72 Posts
Default

Planning a build to perform LLR tests on numbers from 1.5m-5m bits. With FFT's of this size (much smaller than world record sizes), would memory bandwidth be as much of a concern? Could FFT's of this size fit on L3 cache?

I've decided on using a hexacore i5-9600k with an msi mpg z390 motherboard which supports quad channel & up to 4400 mhz ram.

I have 2 1060 6gb and a 980ti laying around and would like to connect them to the build as well for crypto mining (I don't pay electricity costs)/LLR testing/neural network training.

What should I get? I was looking around at 4x 8gb 3600 mHz ram sticks for $180 total. Certainly pricey for RAM. Thoughts? Overkill for my processor? Or still too slow?

Last fiddled with by Trilo on 2019-12-26 at 19:31
Trilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i3 w/DDR4? Fred Hardware 13 2016-03-24 08:16
Can non-K Intel CPUs overclock memory? Prime95 Hardware 5 2015-12-31 22:09
Quad Channel DDR4 vs Dual Channel DDR4 ATH Hardware 17 2015-10-27 21:06
DDR4, Is This Old News? M29 Hardware 6 2014-01-25 22:06
Apple to Switch to Intel CPUs? ewmayer Hardware 20 2005-06-24 01:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:08.

Thu Dec 3 21:08:47 UTC 2020 up 17:20, 1 user, load averages: 1.71, 1.88, 1.97

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.