mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-10-22, 18:41   #23
simon389
 
Aug 2013

5·17 Posts
Default

Let me clarify why I'm going with 3 enthusiast machines and not 5-8 consumer machines. I don't want a ton of heat being produced in my basement. I just want to keep things small and orderly. So I'd rather have three really fast machines even if it costs more.

I ended up buying:

Case: DIYPC DIY-F2-O Black/Orange USB 3.0 Micro-ATX Mini Tower (link)

CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K Coffee Lake 8-Core 3.6 GHz (link)

Mobo: MSI MPG Z390I GAMING EDGE AC (link)

RAM: G.SKILL TridentZ RGB Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4 3866Mhz (link)

Note: 3866mhz RAM has been approved for this mobo

PSU: SeaSonic 400W Platinum (link)

Cooler: ArcticCooling Freezer i32 (link)

SSD (w/ Windows 7): Old 240GB I have laying around

Total cost: $1300


Problem: I realize now that I got a dual-channel RAM setup, when Skylake-X has quad-channel RAM. If this will result in slower LL crunching, should I return everything and get a quad-channel setup considering RAM is the biggest bottleneck?

Last fiddled with by simon389 on 2018-10-22 at 18:42
simon389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-22, 19:14   #24
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

112×37 Posts
Default

Two channels of DDR4 are maxed out by 4 cores. So, if you have something that isn't memory-bandwidth-intensive for the other 4 cores to do, your setup is fine. If you plan on Prime95 or LLR, you'll have 4 idle cores and an utterly wasted expensive CPU.
Your memory speed might allow you to get 4.5 cores worth of production, but you really really need quad channel and 4 memory sticks for that CPU.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-22, 19:25   #25
irowiki
 
Sep 2018

3×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
Haswell (4000 series) or better though. You'll get much more throughput/watt.
It figures you would say that as I was looking at a bunch of cheap ivy bridge i5-3470s!

My favorite in my whole lineup are my machines with the i5-4590, that thing moves!
irowiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-22, 19:52   #26
mackerel
 
mackerel's Avatar
 
Feb 2016
UK

3·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
TIf you plan on Prime95 or LLR, you'll have 4 idle cores and an utterly wasted expensive CPU.
If LLR, the CPU could still be interesting. "Smaller" tasks could fit in the L3 cache and not be ram bandwidth limited. Above that, bandwidth is king, even a 6 core quad channel would likely out perform the 8 core dual channel setup.
mackerel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-22, 20:13   #27
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

5·11·53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irowiki View Post
It figures you would say that as I was looking at a bunch of cheap ivy bridge i5-3470s!
That chips shouldn't be too bad, actually, if it's coupled with DDR3-1600. But keep in mind a new i3-8100 with dual rank DDR-2400 will be something like twice as power efficient.

Quote:
My favorite in my whole lineup are my machines with the i5-4590, that thing moves!
That one is certainly bottlenecked by its maximum clocked DDR3-1600 RAM. I'd look at underclocking/undervolting it.
Mark Rose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-23, 18:19   #28
irowiki
 
Sep 2018

4516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
That chips shouldn't be too bad, actually, if it's coupled with DDR3-1600. But keep in mind a new i3-8100 with dual rank DDR-2400 will be something like twice as power efficient.
Ah, dude has a few dozen dell mini towers leftover from bitcoin mining and he wants $100 for each, was going to try and strike a deal for five or so if they were worth it.


Quote:
That one is certainly bottlenecked by its maximum clocked DDR3-1600 RAM. I'd look at underclocking/undervolting it.
Interesting. So even though it's maxing every core out, it's "wasting" energy so to speak?

It's interesting because I have a new Dell with an i5 6500 and the 4590 beats it handily.

Last fiddled with by irowiki on 2018-10-23 at 18:21
irowiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-23, 20:03   #29
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

1011011000112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irowiki View Post
Ah, dude has a few dozen dell mini towers leftover from bitcoin mining and he wants $100 for each, was going to try and strike a deal for five or so if they were worth it.
Not a bad price.

Quote:
Interesting. So even though it's maxing every core out, it's "wasting" energy so to speak?
Yeah. Basically, the CPUs are busy enough to stay fully clocked, but are still waiting on memory.

Quote:
It's interesting because I have a new Dell with an i5 6500 and the 4590 beats it handily.
Almost certainly comes down to either insufficient cooling on the 6500, or the memory configuration. I have a bunch of i5-6600 that I disable turbo on, then undervolt a lot. Why? They're limited to 4 ranks of DDR4-2133, so going any faster than 3.3 GHz is pointless.

I also have a 4770k system with 8 ranks of DDR4-2400 that's faster than the 6600's.
Mark Rose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-24, 04:18   #30
irowiki
 
Sep 2018

3·23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
Yeah. Basically, the CPUs are busy enough to stay fully clocked, but are still waiting on memory.
Ah, I shall look into it, but not sure if you can undervolt a stock Dell.





Quote:
Almost certainly comes down to either insufficient cooling on the 6500, or the memory configuration. I have a bunch of i5-6600 that I disable turbo on, then undervolt a lot. Why? They're limited to 4 ranks of DDR4-2133, so going any faster than 3.3 GHz is pointless.

I also have a 4770k system with 8 ranks of DDR4-2400 that's faster than the 6600's.
Not a cooling issue I wouldn't think, it was doing the same when it first started and an hour later, also it's an Optiplex and has overkill cooling. I'm guessing it's just cheap motherboard/memory issues.
irowiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-25, 21:59   #31
Brandon
 
Sep 2017

2 Posts
Default

So this seems like a good place to ask a RAM related question at the moment.

I have a Dell Inspiron 15 7000 Gaming laptop, running an i7-7700HQ, with 8GB DDR4 2400, just one stick, so single channel.

I've noticed when running an LL exponent(1 exponent, 4 cores), in any range, the difference in ms/iter between 2.8 GHz(power saving mode) and 3.8 GHz(high performance mode), is practically none. 3.8GHz is no faster, and of course just gets hotter(though I have done some undervolting to help thermals)

Is this simply a case of RAM being a bottleneck?
Probably a really obvious question, I just want to be sure. I see no other explanation...
(sorry if this is not the appropriate place to ask this, 'tis my first post!)
Brandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-25, 23:52   #32
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

157668 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon View Post
Is this simply a case of RAM being a bottleneck?
Yes.

I think it a case of gross negligence that Dell would sell a laptop with that memory configuration (esp. calling it a "Gaming" laptop). Single channel RAM will impact all applications you run.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-26, 03:27   #33
Brandon
 
Sep 2017

2 Posts
Default

Well darn. I'll have to order a matching stick at some point. Thanks for confirming that though.
Brandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i3 w/DDR4? Fred Hardware 13 2016-03-24 08:16
Can non-K Intel CPUs overclock memory? Prime95 Hardware 5 2015-12-31 22:09
Quad Channel DDR4 vs Dual Channel DDR4 ATH Hardware 17 2015-10-27 21:06
DDR4, Is This Old News? M29 Hardware 6 2014-01-25 22:06
Apple to Switch to Intel CPUs? ewmayer Hardware 20 2005-06-24 01:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:31.

Thu Nov 26 21:31:52 UTC 2020 up 77 days, 18:42, 4 users, load averages: 1.84, 1.79, 1.59

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.