mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2007-01-09, 00:35   #1
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

3×5×13×31 Posts
Default Sierpinski/Riesel Base 10

The Sierpinksi value for base 10 is 9175.
The Riesel value for base 10 is 10176.

Primes need to be found for the following n to prove the conjecture.

5028*10^n+1
7666*10^n+1

1803*10^n-1
1935*10^n-1
4421*10^n-1
7019*10^n-1
8579*10^n-1

All are tested to n=50000. (all reserved for rogue)

primes found so far:
8194*10^21129+1 (rogue)
1343*10^29711-1 (rogue)
1803*10^45882-1 (rogue)
7404*10^44826+1 (rogue)
1935*10^51836-1 (rogue)
6665*10^60248-1 (rogue)
5028*10^83982+1 (rogue)

Last fiddled with by michaf on 2007-02-02 at 16:26
rogue is offline  
Old 2007-01-22, 19:39   #2
michaf
 
michaf's Avatar
 
Jan 2005

479 Posts
Default

Wow :)

Congratulations!
(Is there even a prover-code for phrot yet?)
michaf is offline  
Old 2007-01-22, 21:52   #3
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

3·5·13·31 Posts
Default

Phil is in the process of creating one, but the Prime Pages is very slow today.
rogue is offline  
Old 2007-01-22, 23:05   #4
fatphil
 
fatphil's Avatar
 
May 2003

111001112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
Phil is in the process of creating one, but the Prime Pages is very slow today.
Phrot and Tripe and other miscellanea will all get bundled under a single code, which I have self-indulgently named Phils Primality Provers Suite, or "3 P's Suite" for short. (I swear, I'm going to be kicked off the prime pages one of these days :-| ). The code for the code is PPP.

Yes, you may infer that I intend to put primality proving into the programs eventually. However, that's further down the road. Until then *use PFGW for proofs*.

The short code for it is 'PPP', and Professor Caldwell will mark it as a program rather than a human anon, so don't worry if it looks like a human presently.
The prime pages looks fixed too - slick as a greased eel.

Many congrats Mark!

Last fiddled with by fatphil on 2007-01-22 at 23:07 Reason: adding comment about prime pages' speed
fatphil is offline  
Old 2007-01-27, 13:27   #5
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

3·5·13·31 Posts
Default

Completed to 100000 and continuing...
rogue is offline  
Old 2007-02-26, 00:26   #6
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

3×5×13×31 Posts
Default

I've been sidetracked for a while on other more pressing problems that require my CPU. I had started sieving these k, but discontinued. These are free for anyone else to work on. If you are interested in the sr10data.txt file, PM me and I'll send it to you.
rogue is offline  
Old 2007-05-22, 00:11   #7
jasong
 
jasong's Avatar
 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005

66618 Posts
Default

Do you still have these files? If not, can you tell me how far you got with LLR?

Note: I'm going to post this, or something similar in all these types of threads. Whether I work on individual ones or not, I think it's a bad idea to leave progress reports open ended.

Last fiddled with by jasong on 2007-05-22 at 00:13
jasong is offline  
Old 2007-05-22, 02:46   #8
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

10111100111012 Posts
Default

I'm PRP testing right now. I've gone to about 140,000 with no primes. I'll post a file tomorrow.
rogue is offline  
Old 2007-11-18, 02:25   #9
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

1024710 Posts
Default Web page of known k's and primes for k*10^n-1

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue View Post
I'm PRP testing right now. I've gone to about 140,000 with no primes. I'll post a file tomorrow.
Rogue, I am compiling an extensive list of all k*10^n-1 primes and how far the k's have been searched at gbarnes017.googlepages.com/primes-kx10n-1.htm.

I have some questions that will help me keep the data accurate:

1. Which k's of the k*10^n-1 form that you have searched to n=140,000?

2. I show that the only k's remaining to find a prime below the lowest Riesel k=10176 are k=4421, 7019, and 8579. Is that correct? (I'm also guessing that those are the k's you've tested to n=140,000.)

3. Do you know of any other Riesel k's base 10 and their covering sets of factors for k>10176?

Also, if you can spare a few mins., would you mind checking my page for a few of the k's that you have searched, their primes and ranges? That would help me greatly. I have included all known info. from several souces on the page (shown at the bottom including you as a contributor) as well as plenty of add'l. info. from ranges that I have searched.


Thank you,
Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2007-11-18, 05:09   #10
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

3×5×13×31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
I have some questions that will help me keep the data accurate:

1. Which k's of the k*10^n-1 form that you have searched to n=140,000?

2. I show that the only k's remaining to find a prime below the lowest Riesel k=10176 are k=4421, 7019, and 8579. Is that correct? (I'm also guessing that those are the k's you've tested to n=140,000.)

3. Do you know of any other Riesel k's base 10 and their covering sets of factors for k>10176?

Also, if you can spare a few mins., would you mind checking my page for a few of the k's that you have searched, their primes and ranges? That would help me greatly. I have included all known info. from several souces on the page (shown at the bottom including you as a contributor) as well as plenty of add'l. info. from ranges that I have searched.
My search has gone to 195,000 with no primes. I am searching all four of the remaining k. BTW, you are missing 7666. As for question #3, no.
rogue is offline  
Old 2007-11-18, 07:12   #11
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

10,247 Posts
Default

OK, thanks for the update. I have updated the page to show your 3 Riesel k's=4421, 7019, & 8579 tested to n=195K.

k=7666 is for Proth's base 10 per your original post in this thread. It is also 1 mod 3. I'm only showing Riesel's base 10. This means I don't show any k's that are 1 mod 3 where all n's are divisible by 3 and of course no k's that are 0 mod 10, which can be reduced.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sierpinski and Riesel number (Fixed k, Variable base) Citrix Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 16 2017-02-09 15:55
Definition of Sierpinski/Riesel number base b sweety439 Conjectures 'R Us 32 2016-12-16 22:31
Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5: Post Primes Here robert44444uk Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 358 2008-12-08 16:28
Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 23 michaf Conjectures 'R Us 2 2007-12-17 05:04
Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 22 michaf Conjectures 'R Us 49 2007-12-17 05:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:36.

Sat Dec 5 12:36:47 UTC 2020 up 2 days, 8:48, 0 users, load averages: 1.24, 1.37, 1.45

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.