![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2005
Italy
2 Posts |
![]()
Hello,
there are various generalization of the lucas-lehmer test,for example one is in http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Lucas-LehmerTest.html for N+1. I think that i've found another generalization to the theorem and proved the sufficent part. but it seems that the necessary part is beyond my mathematical skill.so,suppose that the theorem that i'm speak about it is not know,my question is: do i have to spent months(years?) to gain the right amount of math knowledge and try to complete the proof,and maybe let another person discover the same thing, or it's better to release an incomplete theorem and let the necessary part to someone else? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Nov 2005
24×3 Posts |
![]() Quote:
John |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Feb 2004
France
2·457 Posts |
![]() Quote:
It is the same for the Pépin's test. It can be used for proving the primality of a kind of Generalized Fermat Numbers, see Saouter . Let describe your findings here. Better Mathematicians than me will help you to understand if it is new or not. Tony Last fiddled with by T.Rex on 2005-12-16 at 19:32 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Dec 2006
3 Posts |
![]()
S(n)=2*S(n-1)^2 -1 where S(0)=2
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2D5716 Posts |
![]()
A.k.a. "LLT in slight disguise."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Nov 2003
22·5·373 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Nov 2011
22·3 Posts |
![]() Last fiddled with by princeps on 2013-06-15 at 03:12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lucas-Lehmer Primes | henryzz | And now for something completely different | 42 | 2019-06-03 14:09 |
Lucas-Lehmer test | Mathsgirl | Information & Answers | 23 | 2014-12-10 16:25 |
lucas lehmer outstretch | science_man_88 | Miscellaneous Math | 7 | 2010-07-14 12:35 |
Lucas-Lehmer Test | storm5510 | Math | 22 | 2009-09-24 22:32 |
Lucas-Lehmer | Dougal | Information & Answers | 9 | 2009-02-06 10:25 |