20220131, 13:14  #34 
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate
19×41 Posts 
As requested, the last 2 proof files for 103,xxx,xxx and 108,xxx,xxx were uploaded over the weekend.

20220201, 14:39  #35 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1100101000000_{2} Posts 
Only 4 remain available to claim for PRP with proofgeneration, each of which will take a while:
PRP=1,2,276036017,1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, available PRP=1,2,315690521,1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, available PRP=1,2,369452123,1,81,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1, available PRP=1,2,852348659,1,86,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1, available Claimed but unable to reserve on mersenne.org: PRP=1,2,231695603,1,79,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, Kriesel repeating with proof generation, ETA today PRP=1,2,285754177,1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, Kriesel repeating with proof generation, ETA 7 weeks Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20220201 at 14:41 
20220201, 16:05  #36  
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
1805_{10} Posts 
Quote:


20220313, 16:10  #37 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{6}·101 Posts 
update
Only 2 remain available to claim for PRP with proofgeneration, each of which will take a while:
PRP=1,2,315690521,1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, available PRP=1,2,852348659,1,86,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1, available Claimed but unable to reserve on mersenne.org (because I ran the first PRP): PRP=1,2,276036017,1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, Kriesel repeating with proof generation, ETA ~16 days PRP=1,2,285754177,1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1, Kriesel repeating with proof generation, ETA ~19 days PRP=1,2,369452123,1,81,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1, Kriesel repeating with proof generation, ETA ~18 days 
20220413, 16:34  #39  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{6}·101 Posts 
Quote:
258150181 (from predict M52 list) kriesel running PRP/proof, ETA ~ 30 April 2022 282362693 (from predict M52 list) kriesel running PRP/proof ETA ~ June 2022 315690521 (from dubious claims list) kriesel running PRP/proof ETA ~ 19 April 2022 limit of mersenne.org current server hardware automatic handling of proof files is ~ 596M 655685803 (from predict M45 list) kriesel running PRP/proof ETA July 2022 852348659 (from dubious claims and subsequently predict M52 list) kriesel running PRP/proof ETA July 2022 limit of mersenne.org exponent range 1000M 1000000007 (from predict M52 list) TF and P1 done; available for first PRP/proof limit of mprime/prime95 AVX512 64M fft exponent handling (PRP, proof, cert,...) 1169M limit of PRP/proofcapable gpuowl versions 2172.36M 2252945257 (from predict M51 list) TF done, Mlucas P1 stage 1 running, at ~23% completed now, total time for both stages estimated at 9.8 months on an Intel i57600T; no first PRP test yet, waiting on P1 GCD results ~1G PRP/proof is feasible in ~4.5 months in Gpuowl on a Radeon VII. If 2.253G were supported in some proofcapable gpuowl version, its PRP/proof would take ~ 2. years on a Radeon VII. From a 268 msec/iteration timing on Mlucas in 128M fft, on Ubuntu/WSL/Win10, using 24 threads on all 24 real cores of a dual Xeon e52697v2 system, it would take ~19.1 years there. I think one could do quite a bit better than that in Mlucas on native Linux, & perhaps employing more threads and/or different hardware, but it is still likely to take at least several years to run on any CPUs I have. And currently, proof generation is not released in Mlucas, and Cert capability is not available, in any known software for such a high exponent, so 2 full PRP runs would be necessary. Proof generation on Mlucas may become available before the P1 stages complete, or shortly after. That would leave unresolved how to perform a cert for an exponent nearly double the maximum now supported in mprime/prime95. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20220413 at 16:38 

20220514, 17:35  #40  
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2^{6}×101 Posts 
Here's a quick update edited into the quoted block (with both
Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20220514 at 17:39 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
"Mixed Sierpinski conjecture base 5" proven!! (if probable primes allowed)  sweety439  Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5  1  20201221 14:08 
Is "mung" or "munged" a negative word in a moral sense?  Uncwilly  Lounge  15  20200414 18:35 
AouessareEl HaddouchiEssaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!"  wildrabbitt  Miscellaneous Math  11  20150306 08:17 
Palindrome primes (a.k.a. Elementary S03E03 "Just a Regular Irregular")  Batalov  And now for something completely different  12  20141116 19:03 
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier?  nitai1999  Software  7  20040826 18:12 