20111125, 08:14  #1 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts 
Primenet eyesores
The length of the tail (OK cut off the straggily bit)
of the waves (LL and DC) is perfectly natural and to be encouraged: The more tests in progress, the more will get finished. ***king formula omitted in case you are intelligent. Why the **** are almost no LLs being dished out TFed to 72? David 
20111125, 09:42  #2  
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
10001011011_{2} Posts 
Quote:
What is/are *your* GPU(s) crunching? 

20111125, 11:04  #3  
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts 
OK. Gloves off!
Quote:
like to trawl. TF takes about 1% of the time of an LL. My Celeron does a LL in ~40 days (24/7). I don't mind getting my hands dirty occasionally. Stop f***ing about with this breadth first, arse over tip approach. David Already Last fiddled with by davieddy on 20111125 at 11:25 

20111125, 14:33  #4 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
2^{6}·131 Posts 
so each participant can do 100 TF for each LL which means if 100 participants did tf we get 10000 tf results every 40 days according to your Celeron stats. so all numbers from 1 to 43112609 done tf in under 473 years and that's including composite exponents. not counting composites and assuming the average result is the same as yours we get all prime exponents under 840,354,253 but remember that's in 473 years I hope you survive it.

20111125, 14:43  #5 
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
7×1,361 Posts 

20111125, 15:27  #6 
Feb 2004
2^{5}·5 Posts 
Looking only at the 50M60M Range...
Since last week 1894 exponent have been TF to 72. Yet in that same time frame 1042 exponent got LL tested for the first time. I think it's fair to assume most of those grabbed a new exponent? But as we know, only 1025 or 50% (I don't remember the number lets say 25%) so we can assume 4000 exponent were handed out last week, a fair amount of those exponent were TF to 72, but they will never get completed. Next time they are released to the pool, we won't have to TF them. We will catch up to the wavefront, just need to give it time... Last fiddled with by diamonddave on 20111125 at 15:35 Reason: Clarification 
20111125, 17:33  #7 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2^{2}×2,371 Posts 

20111125, 17:33  #8 
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts 
Davieddy:
This "tip over arse" effort has yielded 50 factors in the last week between 45M and 50M and another 107 between 50M and 60M. That's a very direct effect on the LL wavefront, and it's exactly the kind of thing we hoped to do...by hitting the "worst offenders first"! Patience grasshopper...patience.... Last fiddled with by Christenson on 20111125 at 17:36 
20111126, 05:25  #9  
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3·5·61 Posts 
Quote:


20111126, 05:32  #10 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
250C_{16} Posts 
My understanding is: there have been some P1 and/or TF (via GPU) successes (factors found) for exponents that have been LL'ed once.

20111126, 05:50  #11 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Primenet and GMPECM  ET_  PrimeNet  9  20180704 20:28 
Hello PrimeNet!!  SeeD419  PrimeNet  7  20110711 18:09 
56.057.x on PrimeNet v5  ckdo  Lone Mersenne Hunters  0  20080904 05:54 
47.048.0 on PrimeNet  ckdo  Lone Mersenne Hunters  0  20080214 20:05 
PrimeNet Report  ZFR  PrimeNet  4  20080213 12:14 