![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2002
86410 Posts |
![]()
Just to let know to other people who are doing non server assigned work in this range.
Early November a lot of exponents lagging at the Double Check wavefront were released back into the pool. Unfortunatly it looks like many of them they were picked up again by another client that does not actually do any work. These exponents were reserved but never updated, are registered to ANONYMOUS, with no cpu name, no work recorded and with 'days to go' gone to a negative value. The ones marked with an asterisk are seven exponents that I have started working on (extra P-1 and LL) and expect to finish before the 60 days period is over. 28258819 * Tha 28262609 * Tha 28339513 * Tha 28351957 * Tha 28404611 * Tha 28425883 * Tha 28452059 * Tha 28465331 28471337 28474087 28476733 28485169 28489207 28491019 28491101 28497499 28513531 28514449 28514693 28519753 28531051 28531057 28533929 28535261 28539479 28544231 28546901 28550267 28550311 28550909 28563097 28566569 28573081 28574713 28579189 28579757 28588337 28589321 28592209 28598201 28602817 28611707 28612691 28613119 28617217 28622617 28627297 28655009 28658687 28663183 28663433 28668589 28679789 28693109 28730941 28751323 28757419 28759363 28759477 28779329 28784731 28786301 28809983 28813847 28818913 28818919 28819093 28819289 28821313 28824689 28842977 28861241 28864109 28869107 28875697 28875751 28876157 28876307 28876597 28877843 28879159 28881109 28887407 28888129 28888261 28890131 28890751 28891537 28892641 28894681 28897207 28898743 28899917 28900217 28900997 28939003 28944551 28968389 28970779 28975501 28976737 28977737 28980199 28980229 28981999 28986851 28990187 28995443 29029769 29031329 29031503 29031553 29126737 29127017 29127349 29204239 29206651 Last fiddled with by tha on 2013-12-21 at 18:37 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
52×211 Posts |
![]()
My guess is that it was CKDO that released them...he used to have lots in that range.
Not sure if it was on purpose though or due to a PC not reporting in for 60 days. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dec 2002
36016 Posts |
![]()
He released them on purpose. The range 26M to 28M has since been progressing fast. By then the unknown client that apparently was registered as having enough confidence and reliability to be assigned preferred exponents kicked in and seemingly abandonded them directly after.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
May 2013
Poland
2·53 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Dec 2002
25·33 Posts |
![]()
First you look up this exponent at the report exponent page. If you want to do significant more P-1 work on the exponent you add the folling line to your worktodo.txt file
Pminus1=N/A,1,2,28550909,-1,600000,12000000 The last two values are B1 and B2. The values 1,2 and -1 must remain. You can omit this entire step if you are satisfied with the P-1 done on this exponent. Next, look up the assignments page. It is here that you can see on which day the exponent was assigned, that it has never been updated and that as of today "the days to go" is at -21. When that value reaches -60 it will be reassigned by the server. So any work you do on that exponent has to be finished by then. If you find a factor in the P-1 stage your work on this exponent is done. If not (most likely) and if you can complete the work in time add the following line to your worktodo.txt file DoubleCheck=N/A,28550909,71,1 N/A means you assigned yourself this exponent, and the server did not. The value 71 is from the reported trial factoring done and the 1 means that P-1 has been done on this exponent already. As you can see on the report a user by the name of Jerry Hallett did the factoring up to 71 only two days ago. Your worktodo.txt file has an entry for each core of your processor. So if you have a four core machine, you can work on four exponents at the same time, just add the lines under each entry [Worker #1] up to [Worker #4] Last fiddled with by tha on 2013-12-23 at 10:44 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
May 2013
Poland
10610 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
May 2013
Poland
2·53 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
23×3×461 Posts |
![]()
Technically, DCing a candidate already assigned for DCing (or LLing similarly) is considered "poaching" by "the community" (or, at least, some of it; definitely those who are not lactose intolerant...).
On the other hand... A regular and dependable participant might wonder why the lowest untested candidate (once, without being suspect) has been allowed to linger for 1,144 days? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Dec 2002
25×33 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Dec 2002
25×33 Posts |
![]() Quote:
People who reserve exponents as "ANONYMOUS" and want to distinguish themselves could enhance the profile of their assignments by at least filling in a computername. That would keep me from considering an exponent. When an assignment becomes the tail of DC or LL and indicates to need a lot more time to complete or give no reliable indication it is not unreasonable to have another computer doubling the work. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
27×17 Posts |
![]()
That does not guarantee 100% that he/she will not pick it up again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ssh -X not working? | Dubslow | Linux | 3 | 2012-05-11 14:44 |
Log Out not working? | cheesehead | Forum Feedback | 1 | 2012-03-19 17:13 |
DST not working? | Dubslow | Forum Feedback | 2 | 2012-03-19 06:53 |
Working on 525 for P-1 | delta_t | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 15 | 2004-09-13 15:27 |
Someone's been working on the 28-28.2M range!!! | garo | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2003-03-28 11:13 |