mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-01-20, 22:34   #12
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

3·7·487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by em99010pepe View Post
Impossible! It's a CPU limitation, the real problem of the false quad-core.




If you want I can easily clean those ranges in a few days....just let me know...
I'm asking people to take no more than 2 files at a time on the drive. You could grab two files to get it started, then when done, grab another 2, etc. I have a file up to n=200K that just needs to be divided up for n>120K so there are plenty to go around.

I'm trying to find a good balance between 'spreading the wealth' around and getting things searched quickly.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2008-01-20, 22:40   #13
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

283010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
I'm asking people to take no more than 2 files at a time on the drive. You could grab two files to get it started, then when done, grab another 2, etc. I have a file up to n=200K that just needs to be divided up for n>120K so there are plenty to go around.

I'm trying to find a good balance between 'spreading the wealth' around and getting things searched quickly.


Gary
2 files will be done in less than 12 hours in case I move all cores...I suggest you start adding more files....lol
em99010pepe is offline  
Old 2008-01-20, 22:44   #14
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

27F316 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by em99010pepe View Post
2 files will be done in less than 12 hours in case I move all cores...I suggest you start adding more files....lol
LMAO!!

Well...can you just move 2 cores to it and put 2 cores on the Riesel side? Both are in top-5K range now.


G
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2008-01-20, 22:51   #15
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2×5×283 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
LMAO!!

Well...can you just move 2 cores to it and put 2 cores on the Riesel side? Both are in top-5K range now.


G
I prefer to concentrate on only one side. For now I'll help to clean this mess here, I still have to move another core when tomorrow I get to work...lol

Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-01-20 at 22:54
em99010pepe is offline  
Old 2008-01-20, 23:03   #16
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

237638 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by em99010pepe View Post
I prefer to concentrate on only one side. For now I'll help to clean this mess here, I still have to move another core when tomorrow I get to work...lol
OK, I'll open it up as the exponents get a little higher and the interest begins to wane.
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2008-01-20, 23:20   #17
tcadigan
 
tcadigan's Avatar
 
Sep 2004
UVic

4616 Posts
Default

actually at one point there was a larger sieve file. jasong had started it, and had even emailed it to me at some point. but I seem to have lost it in both in my email and on my computer (from the hardware crash).

if I remember correctly it wasn't sieved very deeply yet but it had been at least started. sorry about that, back to square one once we reach the 1 mil mark
tcadigan is offline  
Old 2008-01-21, 00:04   #18
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

3·7·487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcadigan View Post
actually at one point there was a larger sieve file. jasong had started it, and had even emailed it to me at some point. but I seem to have lost it in both in my email and on my computer (from the hardware crash).

if I remember correctly it wasn't sieved very deeply yet but it had been at least started. sorry about that, back to square one once we reach the 1 mil mark

I'm not sure how to take 'larger'. Have all candidates been tested up to the range that we are starting at?

The P-value in the sieved file that you send is misleading. It only shows P=1G. I tried sieving for several hours starting at P=1G, 10G, 100G, and 1T and no factors were found. So I'm assuming that it was at least sieved past P=1T.

With the few candidates remaining, sieving would be a waste of time at this point. LLRing takes about 1.75-2.5 hours per candidate. It's unlikely that we'd get that kind of removal rate from just 900+ remaining candidates even if we found the correct point that it had been sieved to. It's faster just to test them out at this point.

Alas, we'll start anew at n=1M.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2008-01-21, 01:56   #19
tcadigan
 
tcadigan's Avatar
 
Sep 2004
UVic

2×5×7 Posts
Default

sieving what is left at this point definitely isn't worthwhile, I looked into that. what I meant by there was a larger one is:

jasong: "I'm sieving n=1 million to 5 million(base 4), which ultimately means all even values for base-2 from 2 to 10 million."

furthermore, jasong: "As soon as I get to 2000G, I'm probably going to be moving on to something else. It would be nice if someone could take over handing out the file."

(both gathered from the original base 4 thread)

I got that new dat file right after that, but now seem to have lost it.

as for the *current* file, i.e. the one that we have right now going up to 1 million (base 4) that has been sieved to 7.5T. iirc the program that I used to split up a dat file into the corresponding .npg files just puts a (mostly) bogus top line on them.

rest assured that when Jean's reservations and this one get to 1 mil it'll be an even playing field again and all of the candidates will be tested up to the 1 mil mark
tcadigan is offline  
Old 2008-01-21, 08:43   #20
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

3·7·487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcadigan View Post
sieving what is left at this point definitely isn't worthwhile, I looked into that. what I meant by there was a larger one is:

jasong: "I'm sieving n=1 million to 5 million(base 4), which ultimately means all even values for base-2 from 2 to 10 million."

furthermore, jasong: "As soon as I get to 2000G, I'm probably going to be moving on to something else. It would be nice if someone could take over handing out the file."

(both gathered from the original base 4 thread)

I got that new dat file right after that, but now seem to have lost it.

as for the *current* file, i.e. the one that we have right now going up to 1 million (base 4) that has been sieved to 7.5T. iirc the program that I used to split up a dat file into the corresponding .npg files just puts a (mostly) bogus top line on them.

rest assured that when Jean's reservations and this one get to 1 mil it'll be an even playing field again and all of the candidates will be tested up to the 1 mil mark

OK, thanks. Sounds good.

In the mean time, n=885K-890K is complete; no primes.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-01-21 at 08:56
gd_barnes is offline  
Old 2008-01-21, 20:13   #21
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2×5×283 Posts
Default

Here's the deal Gary...can I reserve all the files? Tomorrow I'll reserve another chunk of 4 files, then I'll wait 2 days to reserve the rest....
em99010pepe is offline  
Old 2008-01-21, 20:34   #22
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

3×7×487 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by em99010pepe View Post
Here's the deal Gary...can I reserve all the files? Tomorrow I'll reserve another chunk of 4 files, then I'll wait 2 days to reserve the rest....
Carlos,

On this mini-drive, I'm giving no restriction other than what I stated above; that is "Feel free to take whatever files you can do in a resonable time frame". So sure, reserve them all if you want to. I personally am not all that found of such high-n searches. And based on Tcadigan's statements, he had also grown tired of the effort.

Back to drives #1 and #2...I've thought quite a while about this. I've decided to open them up. People can take as many files as they have cores to process them. See the "Edit: Feel free to take one file for each core that you have available to run the searches." statement that I just now put in each drive.

What I'll do in the future (like I've essentially done here) is somewhat limit things at the low ranges of n on drives and then as we get past n=400K base 2, I will open them up to the 'heavy hitters' such as yourself to process many files at a time. I think that will strike a good balance for everyone.

In the case of this mini-drive, of course you're welcome to reserve them all now. But if I had to give a choice, I feel that this one is a little lower priority than drives #1 and #2. I personally would like to see you knock out 5-6 files (or how many ever cores you have available) in Sierp base 16 but feel free to knock this one out first. With n=2K ranges on Sierp base 16, each file will take quite a bit longer than when we were at n<100K.

Thanks for throwing your 'mean machines' at our project! We are all about flexibility here.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 146 2011-04-20 05:12
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 46 2009-10-26 18:19
Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 199 2009-09-30 18:44
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 43 2009-03-06 08:41
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ia gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 170 2008-11-11 05:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:57.

Tue Oct 27 17:57:15 UTC 2020 up 47 days, 15:08, 1 user, load averages: 2.53, 2.21, 2.16

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.