![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
1D8516 Posts |
![]()
The Homogeneous Cunningham reservations page says that 12,7,226+
was reserved by NFS@Home. Yet I see no sign of it on the NFS@Home web site. It does not seem to be queued. Is there a disconnect? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
5×1,033 Posts |
![]()
NFS@Home is finalising sieve of 6,490+ . I don't see that number on the queue but I'll let you know as soon as I see it.
Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-11-02 at 17:37 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
755710 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
3·11·229 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
5×1,033 Posts |
![]()
Here's the update I had a few hours ago from Greg.
NFS@Home is nearly finishing with the redo of 6,490+. After that, there we need to go a little further on 2,1285-. Greg had issued another 100k WU’s for that. After NFS@Home will move to some of the easier ones on the Cunningham Project wanted list. Regarding the latter Greg didn't mention which integers. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-11-04 at 16:01 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
142D16 Posts |
![]()
Just to be clear, Greg didn't mention Homogeneous Cunningham project.
Edit: just thought about one thing. This is possible, I've done it while ago when I sieved a few integers for GCW. There might be a chance that Greg is using NFS@Home platform to distribute that Homogeneous Cunningham integer to his machines. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-11-04 at 16:16 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
26×29 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
3×11×229 Posts |
![]() Quote:
(1) This is from lasieved (i.e. the SMALL numbers) (2) It is not Cunningham. It is Homogeneous Cunningham. (3) Someone from NFS@Home reserved the number, but it has not been queued for lasieved. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
5×1,033 Posts |
![]() Quote:
What I am telling you is there might be a chance that he's distributing that integer to his machines using lasieved, he has done it in the past for me. It won't show up in the progress page. edit: checking tasks in his machines.... Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-11-04 at 17:24 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
2,647 Posts |
![]()
I have no record of this number, although I haven't managed the 14e queue in a while. Perhaps Lionel or Tom know its status.
Edit: That said, it's a fairly trivial number to factor, so it can be thrown in the queue. Last fiddled with by frmky on 2015-11-05 at 01:49 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Sep 2009
22×5×72 Posts |
![]()
The most likely explanation is clearly that I just forgot to pre-process and queue it
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reservations | ET_ | Operazione Doppi Mersennes | 562 | 2023-06-05 15:13 |
Reservations | kar_bon | Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1) | 136 | 2023-02-14 06:58 |
Where are my reservations | fivemack | PrimeNet | 3 | 2016-02-08 17:58 |
Reservations | R.D. Silverman | Cunningham Tables | 15 | 2011-03-04 21:01 |
4-5M Reservations | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 15 | 2008-06-08 03:29 |