mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Riesel Prime Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-01-03, 08:54   #1
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

7×661 Posts
Default RPS benchmarks

Just for interest. Post your bench!!!

i7 3630QM at 3.2 GHz "28 watts with core temp software" with HT on (can't turn HT off on this laptop)
AVX FFT length 200K, Pass1=640, Pass2=320 on both instances
1.158 ms k=5 n=3801694
1.164 ms k=5 n=3812730
pinhodecarlos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-04, 12:05   #2
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

7·661 Posts
Default

Paul's 4770K at 3.9 GHz, HT off.

0.975 ms k=5 n=4100030 AVX FFT length 224K
0.977 ms k=5 n=4200010 AVX FFT length 224K
1.050 ms k=5 n=4300000 AVX FFT length 240K
1.042 ms k=5 n=4400024 AVX FFT length 240K

Edit: Paul, correct me if I am wrong. Thank you.

Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2014-01-04 at 12:06
pinhodecarlos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 14:28   #3
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

10101001012 Posts
Default

benchmarks only useful with all cores busy and then divide it by number of cores you run for total throughput.

At the oldie Xeon machines here it takes pretty long for 1 test, yet each box i can run 8 cores meanwhile total box consumption 170 watt. Built those machines a few years ago for total peanuts, like 200 euro each.

Chip inside L5420 has SSSE so not AVX.

All those new i7's, they have fast AVX, yet only 4 real cores. Where is the big progress in crunching there?

the L5420 or something i run here at 2.5Ghz, they were produced

http://ark.intel.com/nl/products/339...z-1333-MHz-FSB

So januari 2008.

If we calculate then derived truth from Moore's Law each 18 months doubling in speed, then now januari 2014 we should have a new chip available that's:

6 years == 72 months => 72 / 18 = 4 doublings => 2^4 = 16 times faster than the chips i got.

Only gpu's seem to speed up, though also goes slower now than a few years ago for progress there.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 15:34   #4
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

7·661 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diep View Post
benchmarks only useful with all cores busy and then divide it by number of cores you run for total throughput.

At the oldie Xeon machines here it takes pretty long for 1 test, yet each box i can run 8 cores meanwhile total box consumption 170 watt. Built those machines a few years ago for total peanuts, like 200 euro each.

Chip inside L5420 has SSSE so not AVX.

All those new i7's, they have fast AVX, yet only 4 real cores. Where is the big progress in crunching there?

the L5420 or something i run here at 2.5Ghz, they were produced

http://ark.intel.com/nl/products/339...z-1333-MHz-FSB

So januari 2008.

If we calculate then derived truth from Moore's Law each 18 months doubling in speed, then now januari 2014 we should have a new chip available that's:

6 years == 72 months => 72 / 18 = 4 doublings => 2^4 = 16 times faster than the chips i got.

Only gpu's seem to speed up, though also goes slower now than a few years ago for progress there.
You didn't answer the thread question.
pinhodecarlos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 15:41   #5
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

67710 Posts
Default

You didn't write a questionmark :)

Last fiddled with by diep on 2014-01-06 at 15:41
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 15:45   #6
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

10010000100112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diep View Post
You didn't write a questionmark :)
Post your k=69 LLR iteration speed of your machines.
pinhodecarlos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 16:00   #7
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

2×1,667 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
Paul's 4770K at 3.9 GHz, HT off.

0.975 ms k=5 n=4100030 AVX FFT length 224K
0.977 ms k=5 n=4200010 AVX FFT length 224K
1.050 ms k=5 n=4300000 AVX FFT length 240K
1.042 ms k=5 n=4400024 AVX FFT length 240K

Edit: Paul, correct me if I am wrong. Thank you.
Note that this is with all 4 cores loaded and with 2400MHz RAM.
paulunderwood is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 16:12   #8
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

677 Posts
Default

I only have completiontime for all iterations.
LLR graphical shows iteration times
CLLR64 is considerable faster however. It is textmode.
Just prints result in lresults.txt

Machine was only actively used at 8 cores by CLLR64 when it printed result of the prime find here.

Which is pretty much average time of the n's around it that it tested.

69*2^2649939-1 is prime! Time : 5925.793 seconds.

So if i use calculator that makes iteration time 5925793 /2649939 = 2.2362 ms

Really great for 2.5Ghz @ 8 cores Xeon from 2008.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-05-04, 10:11   #9
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

7×661 Posts
Default

Anyone here with some benches on AMD Opteron 6300 series? Does AVX works as on the Intel processors?
pinhodecarlos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-05-04, 11:22   #10
pepi37
 
pepi37's Avatar
 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)

101000110102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
Anyone here with some benches on AMD Opteron 6300 series? Does AVX works as on the Intel processors?
I think, until now there is no successful implementation of AVX on AMD ( or you can read it as there is no increased speed using AVX on any AMD chips)
pepi37 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-05-04, 11:39   #11
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

7·661 Posts
Default

I was in doubt because it is much cheaper to buy an AMD server with 4 processors than one from Intel. Thank you.
pinhodecarlos is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Benchmarks MurrayInfoSys Information & Answers 3 2011-04-14 17:10
LLR benchmarks Oddball No Prime Left Behind 11 2010-08-06 21:39
benchmarks Unregistered Information & Answers 15 2009-08-18 16:44
Benchmarks for i7 965 lavalamp Hardware 21 2009-01-06 04:32
Benchmarks Vandy Hardware 6 2002-10-28 13:45

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:10.

Sat Aug 8 20:10:41 UTC 2020 up 22 days, 15:57, 1 user, load averages: 1.41, 1.41, 1.49

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.