![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Feb 2004
France
3·311 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Feb 2004
France
3×311 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Anyway, use modulo Np is a good idea. About LLT good for N numbers such that N+1 can be easily factored, yes it is written in books. But that's wrong. The LLT (with a different seed than 4 : 5) can be used for proving that a Fermat number is prime. There are at least 3 proofs for this, including mine. See: PrimalityTest2FermatNumbers.pdf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another Wagstaff PRP Test | paulunderwood | Wagstaff PRP Search | 10 | 2022-03-31 04:19 |
Status of Wagstaff testing? and testing Mersenne primes for Wagstaff-ness | GP2 | Wagstaff PRP Search | 414 | 2020-12-27 08:11 |
500€ Reward for a proof for the Wagstaff primality test conjecture | Tony Reix | Wagstaff PRP Search | 7 | 2013-10-10 01:23 |
Hot tuna! -- a p75 and a p79 by Sam Wagstaff! | Batalov | GMP-ECM | 9 | 2012-08-24 10:26 |
Wagstaff number primality test? | ixfd64 | Math | 12 | 2010-01-05 16:36 |