mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-04-15, 16:17   #1
tomtuba
 
Apr 2019

1 Posts
Default Missing Work

All,


My 1st assignment was 51 711 683 which completed ( composite ), however ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT DETAILS shows only 1% complete. I have subsequently tested two more exponents, 51 861 643 and 51 640 327 ( both composite ) which are reported normally. ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT DETAILS correctly shows my 4th assignment, 90 268 327, as about 65% complete.



What has happened to 51 711 683?


Thanks,


tom
tomtuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-15, 16:59   #2
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

22·43·47 Posts
Default

Please send your results.txt and prime.log files to me at woltman@alum.mit.edu

Thanks
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-15, 22:36   #3
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

25·3·5·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomtuba View Post
All,


My 1st assignment was 51 711 683 which completed ( composite ), however ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT DETAILS shows only 1% complete. I have subsequently tested two more exponents, 51 861 643 and 51 640 327 ( both composite ) which are reported normally. ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT DETAILS correctly shows my 4th assignment, 90 268 327, as about 65% complete.



What has happened to 51 711 683?


Thanks,


tom
For what it's worth, on 51711683 I did see one interim residue was reported in (at the 500,000th iteration).

Nothing beyond that for that exponent.

I see these two exponents reported in okay when they were done: 51964063, 51861643

Basically it seems like the result for that one exponent never got reported in. George can hopefully look at the prime.log file and see why, but your results.txt file should still have the result in there that you can submit manually.

The fact that it didn't report any of the interim residues beyond that first one at 500K iterations tells me it wasn't just a one-time glitch.
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-16, 10:02   #4
pokemonlover123
 
pokemonlover123's Avatar
 
Mar 2016

26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
The fact that it didn't report any of the interim residues beyond that first one at 500K iterations tells me it wasn't just a one-time glitch.
Either that it was a one-time glitch that happened at the second residue, but it had the effect of stopping the reporting of the rest of the residues and the result.
pokemonlover123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Missing top 10? R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 3 2011-03-18 21:35
what causes missing results? ixfd64 PrimeNet 1 2008-08-28 05:15
A missing identity fivemack Factoring 4 2008-03-04 05:04
Missing from Stats? ColdFury NFSNET Discussion 1 2005-02-18 09:27
missing? tha Data 6 2003-09-14 21:36

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:11.


Sat Dec 10 03:11:30 UTC 2022 up 114 days, 40 mins, 0 users, load averages: 1.12, 1.06, 1.07

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔