mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-05-08, 01:48   #1
c10ck3r
 
c10ck3r's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Kansas

10438 Posts
Default GPU questions

Howdy!
So, I have a GTX 460 that is currently running mfaktc 0.18 (2 instances), which is being fed by a 3.2Ghz single-core Pent D 940 w/ 2G DDR2 RAM.
My first question is: for GPU72 exponents (currently 56M 71-72 bits), will there be a noticeable difference between 420 and 4620 classes?
My second question is: for GPU72 exponents (and similarly larger exponents), would P-1 be feasible to implement on a GPU, even if only on a partial scale. I guess I'll break this down into two parts: for B1/B2 at the normal bounds (or a new multiplier based on GPU performance), or for B1=B2 (ie no stage 2).
My third question (sorry, they just keep coming :P ) is whether, if (2) is feasible, is anyone currently trying/successfully implementing this?
Thanks!
Johann
c10ck3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-05-08, 02:48   #2
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3×29×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c10ck3r View Post
Howdy!
So, I have a GTX 460 that is currently running mfaktc 0.18 (2 instances), which is being fed by a 3.2Ghz single-core Pent D 940 w/ 2G DDR2 RAM.
My first question is: for GPU72 exponents (currently 56M 71-72 bits), will there be a noticeable difference between 420 and 4620 classes?
My second question is: for GPU72 exponents (and similarly larger exponents), would P-1 be feasible to implement on a GPU, even if only on a partial scale. I guess I'll break this down into two parts: for B1/B2 at the normal bounds (or a new multiplier based on GPU performance), or for B1=B2 (ie no stage 2).
My third question (sorry, they just keep coming :P ) is whether, if (2) is feasible, is anyone currently trying/successfully implementing this?
Thanks!
Johann
1) No, and in fact running multiple instances on just one core probably won't help anything. You should definitely be using more classes though, while not a major difference, it is still enough of a difference to choose more classes over less.

2) I'm not entirely sure, but it would require similar FFT multiplication-of-numbers to the LL test, just the actual calculations are a bit different.

3) Again, not sure, but I don't think anybody's working on it. LaurV had a small experiment, but I don't think he's gotten anywhere with that.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two questions: Dubslow GPU Computing 1 2011-08-05 18:22
Questions about the QS Carmichael Factoring 8 2007-04-10 11:30
Questions OmbooHankvald Prime Sierpinski Project 2 2005-08-01 20:18
LLR questions OmbooHankvald Math 6 2005-06-23 11:42
A few questions :) xtreme2k Lounge 59 2002-10-31 06:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:03.


Tue Nov 30 00:03:51 UTC 2021 up 129 days, 18:32, 0 users, load averages: 1.10, 1.14, 1.18

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.