mersenneforum.org 332.2M - 333.9M (aka 100M digit range)
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2008-09-25, 06:41 #1 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 3·3,187 Posts 332.2M - 333.9M (aka 100M digit range) I am nominally taking the range starting at 332,192,831 (the first 100M digit number) up to 333,999,999. Most is already at 2^61 already. I will take the early ones up to at least 66. I will also bring the earliest to 68. I'll be doing it in fits and spurts, using the v5 server to report , gather work, and get it assigned. Fellow workers are welcome. If we get a few upto ^74, so that they will be ready for P-1, that would be great.
2008-09-25, 09:16   #2
ET_
Banned

"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

4,813 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly I am nominally taking the range starting at 332,192,831 (the first 100M digit number) up to 333,999,999. Most is already at 2^61 already. I will take the early ones up to at least 66. I will also bring the earliest to 68. I'll be doing it in fits and spurts, using the v5 server to report , gather work, and get it assigned. Fellow workers are welcome. If we get a few upto ^74, so that they will be ready for P-1, that would be great.
I'd suggest a sticky thread with some indications on "how to" start, and a couple lines to describe the project as Uncwilly did.

I will "manually" join s soon as I complete my small GNFS work.

Luigi

 2008-09-25, 14:13 #3 mdettweiler A Sunny Moo     Aug 2007 USA (GMT-5) 3×2,083 Posts Just curious...isn't the 100 Million Digits Prefactor Project already doing this range? Or is that project officially dead by now? Edit: Never mind, I just saw the message about this in the 100 Million Digit Prefactor Project thread. Silly me for posting before I looked. Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-09-25 at 14:14
2008-09-25, 18:14   #4
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

3×3,187 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Anonymous Just curious...isn't the 100 Million Digits Prefactor Project already doing this range? Or is that project officially dead by now? Edit: Never mind, I just saw the message about this in the 100 Million Digit Prefactor Project thread. Silly me for posting before I looked.
Old 100Mdpp: I'll try to get into the old yahoo site and kill it or point to this thread.

Anonymous, if you are the one grabbing up the ones for LL that I took to 64 or better, are you doing any TF on them? George indicated that they should go to 74, then P-1, then to 76.

After doing some intial broad work to get at least the first 100 or so (that have no factors found) to 66, I'll set one work thread to bring the early ones up to 68, then to 69, then 70 (I'll stop at the level where it takes ~24 hrs to TF one expo one bit level). The other worker thread will be doing runs to 66 down the range.

2008-09-25, 18:55   #5
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo

Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3·2,083 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Old 100Mdpp: I'll try to get into the old yahoo site and kill it or point to this thread. Anonymous, if you are the one grabbing up the ones for LL that I took to 64 or better, are you doing any TF on them? George indicated that they should go to 74, then P-1, then to 76. After doing some intial broad work to get at least the first 100 or so (that have no factors found) to 66, I'll set one work thread to bring the early ones up to 68, then to 69, then 70 (I'll stop at the level where it takes ~24 hrs to TF one expo one bit level). The other worker thread will be doing runs to 66 down the range.
No, I haven't done any exponents whatsoever in that range. I think the mysterious "Anonymous" user who's doing those is some kind of default no-name user on PrimeNet v5, or something like that.

For future reference, my PrimeNet ID (v4 and v5) is "mdettweiler"--not "Anonymous". In fact, I probably would have changed my forum name to something different by now if only it was possible. Hmm...I was just thinking, can Xyzzy change forum login names? If so, I might be interested...

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2008-09-25 at 18:56

2008-09-25, 21:35   #6
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

3×3,187 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Anonymous For future reference, my PrimeNet ID (v4 and v5) is "mdettweiler"--not "Anonymous". In fact, I probably would have changed my forum name to something different by now if only it was possible. Hmm...I was just thinking, can Xyzzy change forum login names? If so, I might be interested...
Mister uberpower can. He changed somebody's a while back. It breaks all the quotes, etc.

Becareful what you wish for...............

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2008-09-25 at 22:19

2008-09-25, 23:39   #7
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo

Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

11000011010012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Mister uberpower can. He changed somebody's a while back. It breaks all the quotes, etc. Becareful what you wish for...............
Oh my. LOL--funny, indeed. I've sent a PM to Xyzzy requesting that it be changed slightly so as to avoid confusion at the two prime-search projects which I assistant-administer.

2008-09-29, 16:11   #8
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

100101010110012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly After doing some intial broad work to get at least the first 100 or so (that have no factors found) to 66, I'll set one work thread to bring the early ones up to 68, then to 69, then 70 (I'll stop at the level where it takes ~24 hrs to TF one expo one bit level). The other worker thread will be doing runs to 66 down the range.
All 100 are to 66. The first 20, (except those assigned to others are to 74). The first 55 are assigned or up to 70. (Hopefully data will come in on those soon.)

Before I reload my comp. I will check back in with the v5 server.

 2008-10-11, 00:12 #9 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 3×3,187 Posts I will avoid being like starqwest . Here is a progress status report Code: Date 10/10/2008 Average bit depth for first 100 expos 69.88 Average bit depth for first 1000 expos 64.928 100th active expo (no factor found) 332197631 1000th active expo (no factor found) 332237557 Unitless total effort number 267040
 2008-10-13, 19:32 #10 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 3·3,187 Posts [Oct 13 12:00] Trial factoring of M332194417 to 2^70 is 70.40% complete. [Oct 13 12:10] M332194417 has a factor: 1166327369238839882369 This expo was assigned as LL to someone else. I just got a factor. Hopefully they can get called off. Any of the expos assigned to LL, if no TF effort is being reported to the v5 server, I will take them to 2^70, then 2^71, and maybe once I get far enough up to 2^72. I am trying to get all at least 100 expos to 2^72 with no factors found. I will continue working this range and working the first 1000 to 2^68 (then higher), then start bringing the first 5000 up to 2^65 (then higher). Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2008-10-13 at 19:38
2008-10-17, 00:32   #11
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

3·3,187 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly [Oct 13 12:00] Trial factoring of M332194417 to 2^70 is 70.40% complete. [Oct 13 12:10] M332194417 has a factor: 1166327369238839882369 This expo was assigned as LL to someone else. I just got a factor. Hopefully they can get called off.
Picked off another.
[Oct 16 11:12] Trial factoring of M332194901 to 2^70 is 49.78% complete. Time: 781.652 sec.
[Oct 16 11:23] M332194901 has a factor: 1048513725453002816831

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Uncwilly GPU to 72 64 2013-03-31 02:45 JuanTutors PrimeNet 8 2012-12-06 13:47 JuanTutors Lounge 6 2012-02-21 07:36 __HRB__ Riesel Prime Search 0 2010-05-22 01:17 Unregistered Information & Answers 10 2010-03-24 20:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:52.

Mon May 10 08:52:36 UTC 2021 up 32 days, 3:33, 0 users, load averages: 1.58, 1.83, 1.88