mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-04-29, 00:11   #562
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

2×52×103 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
Ryan Propper found another factor and another PRP #356: M3917
I'm curious. Usually when a cofactor tests as a PRP, the residue is listed as

PRP_PRP_PRP_PRP_

But here, although the history says the remaining cofactor is a probable prime, the PRP cofactor residue is a hex value with, I presume, the last few digits obscured pending confirmation...
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-04-29, 01:05   #563
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

3,203 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus View Post
I'm curious. Usually when a cofactor tests as a PRP, the residue is listed as

PRP_PRP_PRP_PRP_

But here, although the history says the remaining cofactor is a probable prime, the PRP cofactor residue is a hex value with, I presume, the last few digits obscured pending confirmation...
Yeah, that is strange I had not noticed, since it was spamming my results.txt with PRP. It was on an AWS instance, and I only noticed it by coincidence, because I was upgrading it to 30.6b4.

Now I ran it again and unintentionally double checked my own result, now it shows as PRP. But PRP-CF usually do not have hidden or fake residues?
I'm not sure why it used type 1 PRP test, here in the 2nd manual test I specifically told it to do a type 5 test.

Someone else please double check it as well.

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2021-04-29 at 01:06
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-04-29, 04:47   #564
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

5×11×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
Someone else please double check it as well.
Like Ryan's other recent factor discoveries, the factor got reported almost immediately to FactorDB (by Ryan himself?), and the cofactor is usually already certified prime there before the first PRP test completes on PrimeNet.

FactorDB link

Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2021-04-29 at 04:58
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-04-29, 05:23   #565
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

100110010101002 Posts
Default

Wow, 61 digits? That's a beast! Congrats Ryan!
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-04-29, 11:14   #566
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

2×52×103 Posts
Default

A 61 decimal digit factor winkled out. Amazing!

Whatever the problem was with the PRP cofactor residue, it's been fixed. Two tests show a residue of PRP_PRP_PRP_PRP_

And, as previously noted, the cofactor is already certified prime. Another fully-factored Mersenne composite!
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-20, 13:50   #567
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

A1916 Posts
Default

There are now 357 known Mersenne numbers with prime exponent that are composite and either fully factored or probably fully factored.

The most recent is M4021. Its final factor (66 digits) was found by Ryan Propper on 2021-05-19 and the PRP test was done by user "mnd9".

FactorDB link

The cofactor was already certified prime yesterday on FactorDB.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-11-06, 11:20   #568
tuckerkao
 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123

3×191 Posts
Default

Just finished the PRP-CF of M3769231 and M5078387, looks like Ben Delo will certify both exponents like last time.

Wondering whether anyone has a P-PRP cofactor with the exponent size over 1M on the record?

Last fiddled with by masser on 2021-11-06 at 15:12 Reason: read more, post less
tuckerkao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-11-06, 15:17   #569
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
Behind BB

176810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuckerkao View Post
Just finished the PRP-CF of M3769231 and M5078387, looks like Ben Delo will certify both exponents like last time.

Wondering whether anyone has a P-PRP cofactor with the exponent size over 1M on the record?
See post 519 of this thread.
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-11-06, 16:27   #570
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

515010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by masser View Post
See post 519 of this thread.
That would be this post.

See also the next post to the thread, this post.

(The PRP cofactor (2^10443557-1)/37289325994807 has since been pushed down to position #8 in the Probable Primes Top 10000 site)
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-11-06, 16:45   #571
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
Behind BB

110111010002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus View Post
That would be this post.

See also the next post to the thread, this post.

(The PRP cofactor (2^10443557-1)/37289325994807 has since been pushed down to position #8 in the Probable Primes Top 10000 site)
I would like young Tucker to do some of the legwork himself.
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-11-06, 21:30   #572
tuckerkao
 
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123

10001111012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus View Post
(The PRP cofactor (2^10443557-1)/37289325994807 has since been pushed down to position #8 in the Probable Primes Top 10000 site)
What test will be needed to confirm the probable prime from the cofactor of M10443557? Is there 1 doable test like LL to the regular PRP?
tuckerkao is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smallest exponent for mersenne not-factored preda PrimeNet 10 2018-11-04 00:47
Largest Mersenne Number Fully Factored? c10ck3r Data 49 2017-12-10 19:39
Possibility of a Fully-Factored Number Trejack FactorDB 7 2016-05-14 05:38
Estimating the number of primes in a partially-factored number CRGreathouse Probability & Probabilistic Number Theory 15 2014-08-13 18:46
Number of distinct prime factors of a Double Mersenne number aketilander Operazione Doppi Mersennes 1 2012-11-09 21:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:27.


Wed Dec 8 15:27:42 UTC 2021 up 138 days, 9:56, 1 user, load averages: 1.37, 1.45, 1.55

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.