mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > GPU to 72

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-09-29, 11:47   #4082
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

23×32×139 Posts
Default

I have another "hung" DC: completed on PrimeNet, still showing in GPU72.
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...4500411&full=1
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-30, 17:16   #4083
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

23×32×139 Posts
Default

There are now four (I think) DC completions not showing in GPU72.
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-26, 05:30   #4084
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2×5×439 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Yes. Looking at James' GPU cross-over analysis, it makes sense to TF from 45M and up to 73 bits on most cards.
Where do I find this?
petrw1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-26, 05:37   #4085
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2·5·439 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Yes. Looking at James' GPU cross-over analysis, it makes sense to TF from 45M and up to 73 bits on most cards.
What about 50-59M exponents?

Should they go beyond 73 bits?
petrw1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-26, 13:32   #4086
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

303810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
Where do I find this?
For example for a GTX 1080:
http://www.mersenne.ca/cudalucas.php?model=684

Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2017-11-26 at 13:33
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-26, 15:00   #4087
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2×4,657 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
What about 50-59M exponents? Should they go beyond 73 bits?
Yes. 57M to 59M should go to 74 bits. But since the ranges we're currently working are in the Cat 2, 3 and 4 ranges I figured we should (mostly) finish those off first, and then move up there early next year.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-26, 18:58   #4088
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2×5×439 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Yes. 57M to 59M should go to 74 bits. But since the ranges we're currently working are in the Cat 2, 3 and 4 ranges I figured we should (mostly) finish those off first, and then move up there early next year.
This https://www.gpu72.com/reports/estima...tion/primenet/ makes it look like all the 5xM are in the queue.
petrw1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-26, 19:33   #4089
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·4,657 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
This https://www.gpu72.com/reports/estima...tion/primenet/ makes it look like all the 5xM are in the queue.
No more so than 41M through 44M. The Total column shows "Completed".

I actually need to update that report to reflect the work needed in the high 5xMs (and add a 74 bit column). I have done so for the Current TF Factoring Depth report already. I'll work on adding that this week.

Edit: Actually, I just updated that report.

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2017-11-26 at 19:44
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-11-27, 01:39   #4090
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

112616 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
No more so than 41M through 44M. The Total column shows "Completed".

I actually need to update that report to reflect the work needed in the high 5xMs (and add a 74 bit column). I have done so for the Current TF Factoring Depth report already. I'll work on adding that this week.

Edit: Actually, I just updated that report.
petrw1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-04, 17:22   #4091
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2×4,657 Posts
Default Possible down-time...

So, one of the drives on the GPU72 server is failing.

It is scheduled to be replaced in the next hour or so. It's "hot-swappable", and one of the drives in a RAID1 set, so there should be no downtime.

But... Crap happens...

P.S. I seriously hate Seagate. In this case I have no choice, but when I do I refuse to buy Seagate drives.

Code:
# smartctl -a /dev/sda

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family:     Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 (AF)
Device Model:     ST1000DM003-9YN162
Serial Number:    S1DA97XG
...
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
# 1  Short offline       Completed: read failure       10%      7476         244751313
# 2  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       90%      7462         244751313
# 3  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       90%      7459         244751313
# 4  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       10%      5487         1953513120
# 5  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       10%      5460         1953513120
# 6  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%      5446         -
# 7  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       10%      5373         1953512248

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2017-12-04 at 17:29 Reason: Edit: SMART is good...
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-12-04, 18:07   #4092
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

BDE16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
one of the drives in a RAID1 set, so there should be no downtime.
...when I do I refuse to buy Seagate drives.
I also avoid Seagate like the plague. If I had RAID1 with two Seagate drives and one failed, I would expect the second one to also fail before the array could be rebuilt.
I haven't bought a Seagate drive in 8 years now because about 80% of the Seagate drives I've ever had have died on me, sometimes getting replaced 3 times in the warranty period.
Not quite as bad as the Deathstars, but I still don't trust them to hold my data.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Status Primeinator Operation Billion Digits 5 2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 27 2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status Uncwilly Operation Billion Digits 22 2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status paulunderwood 3*2^n-1 Search 2 2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 25 2004-06-18 16:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:12.

Tue Sep 29 05:12:13 UTC 2020 up 19 days, 2:23, 0 users, load averages: 2.10, 1.73, 1.55

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.