mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-02-12, 17:10   #793
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

9B216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
Now a c153.
ECM anyone?

P-1: B1=1e9, B2=1e14, no factor.

ECM: I have queued 1000@11e6 this morning (=12 hours ago), no factor so far after ~420 curves.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-12, 21:05   #794
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

248210 Posts
Default

P+1: 3* B1=1e9, B2=1e14, no factor.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-12, 22:51   #795
Joshua2
 
Joshua2's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

13·41 Posts
Default

running coeff 60-2400 poly search just in case, we should prob do some more ecm though. upon 2nd thought not right now it slows my comp too much

Last fiddled with by Joshua2 on 2010-02-12 at 23:02
Joshua2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 02:55   #796
Joshua2
 
Joshua2's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

53310 Posts
Default

i tried running msieve -np 1,100 and it took 13 minutes and after lots of:
poly 0 p 226547647 q 237869767 coeff 53888836006288249 it said:
error generating or reading NFS polynomials
Joshua2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 03:08   #797
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

100010001112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua2 View Post
i tried running msieve -np 1,100 and it took 13 minutes and after lots of:
poly 0 p 226547647 q 237869767 coeff 53888836006288249 it said:
error generating or reading NFS polynomials
First, msieve needs to batch the a5 values for it to work efficiently. Using a range from 1 to 100 will test only a single a5=60 (a5's are multiples of 60 in msieve). The default is to batch 40 a5's together so it would cover a range of 2400.

Secondly, it's been noticed that the internal parameters which msieve use are not very good for c153 and need a little adjustment. See the thread: bad parameters for 153-digit CPU polsel ?

If you are able to build msieve yourself, you can try adjusting the line for c152 and c153 parameters (both, since this number is between those) in poly_skew.c like fivemack suggested, multiplying the stage2 bounds by 2 and the final bounds by 2/3.
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 03:24   #798
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

53×73 Posts
Default

First, it needs ~3-4K curves at 11e6. Then, let's try our best.

I will try cover a small chunk of the poly search space with -np 24000,28800
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 03:33   #799
jrk
 
jrk's Avatar
 
May 2008

3·5·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
I will try cover a small chunk of the poly search space with -np 24000,28800
I will try as well; reserving -np 48060,60000.
jrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 06:35   #800
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

2·17·73 Posts
Default

162 more curves at B1=11e6 (total 582), no factor.

ECM anyone?? If I do this alone, it would take a week or so...
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 06:54   #801
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

2×1,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi47 View Post
162 more curves at B1=11e6 (total 582), no factor.

ECM anyone?? If I do this alone, it would take a week or so...
I've got some curves running. Unfortunately, I've got a c129 & a c133 occupying my two fastest systems....
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 08:02   #802
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

2,039 Posts
Default

I've done 600 curves at B1=11e7, which basically completes testing for 45 digit factors. I'll leave it running overnight, which will complete about half of t50. I suggest you move to either B1=43e6 or 11e7.
frmky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 08:11   #803
schickel
 
schickel's Avatar
 
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville

1000010010102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frmky View Post
I've done 600 curves at B1=11e7, which basically completes testing for 45 digit factors. I'll leave it running overnight, which will complete about half of t50. I suggest you move to either B1=43e6 or 11e7.
I can probably get ~30 curves an hour @ 43M. I'll leave it running overnight and see where we're at tomorrow.....
schickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366 RichD Aliquot Sequences 406 2020-06-10 03:10
Primes in n-fibonacci sequence and n-step fibonacci sequence sweety439 And now for something completely different 17 2017-06-13 03:49
ECM for c166 from 4788:2661 frmky Aliquot Sequences 36 2011-04-28 06:27
ECM work on 4788:2549.c170 schickel Aliquot Sequences 51 2011-01-05 02:32
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved petrw1 Lone Mersenne Hunters 82 2010-01-11 01:57

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:45.

Mon Sep 21 10:45:50 UTC 2020 up 11 days, 7:56, 0 users, load averages: 1.21, 1.49, 1.56

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.