mersenneforum.org P-1 factor result not recognized by Prime Net
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2022-09-13, 06:51 #1 leonardyan96     "Cassessory" May 2017 Northern China 53 Posts P-1 factor result not recognized by Prime Net Code: {"status":"F", "exponent":115587421, "worktype":"PM1", "fft-length":6815744, "B1":1000000, "B2":20004270, "partial-stage-2":true, "factors":["6089470462241479338655873"], "program":{"name":"Mlucas", "version":"20.1.1"}, "timestamp":"2022-09-11 17:45:02 UTC", "aid":"D8E1E914A098B544828E0310E8187C04"}
 2022-09-13, 06:53 #2 leonardyan96     "Cassessory" May 2017 Northern China 53 Posts I tried submitting it via manual results, but failed.
 2022-09-13, 06:58 #3 Batalov     "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3×3,329 Posts You can always submit it in a PFGW-like format: M115587421 has a factor: 6089470462241479338655873
 2022-09-13, 07:04 #4 Prime95 P90 years forever!     Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 11111100101002 Posts Try changing worktype from "PM1" to "P-1"
2022-09-14, 05:18   #5
leonardyan96

"Cassessory"
May 2017
Northern China

53 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 Try changing worktype from "PM1" to "P-1"
Doesn't work. Manual results still doesn't understand this.

2022-09-14, 05:23   #6
leonardyan96

"Cassessory"
May 2017
Northern China

1101012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Batalov You can always submit it in a PFGW-like format: M115587421 has a factor: 6089470462241479338655873
Works. Though I saw you have already submitted it for me...

2022-09-14, 13:29   #7
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

392210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Batalov You can always submit it in a PFGW-like format: M115587421 has a factor: 6089470462241479338655873
Please don't suggest that as it loses all data about how the factor was found.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by leonardyan96 I tried submitting it via manual results, but failed.
As it says in the upper-right corner of the manual results page, if you find a problem with manual results reporting, please let me know directly so I can fix it.

This is the first result I've seen with the new partial-stage-2 key which is why the result was not initially accepted. It is accepted now, I've asked George to fix the database so there's only 1 correct result for 115587421.

2022-09-14, 16:40   #8
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

710110 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich As it says in the upper-right corner of the manual results page, if you find a problem with manual results reporting, please let me know directly so I can fix it.
I know from repeated experience that James is typically welcoming of such feedback and FAST at resolving issues. PM or email him with enough details, and it gets fixed. (Entire result record, and screen capture of server response.) Sometimes it takes multiple iterations. On occasion from first PM send to resolution is under a day. But first he needs to know there is an issue. Don't expect him to read the whole forum searching endlessly for issues to address. There are better uses for his time. To notify him works best.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-09-14 at 16:41

2022-09-15, 03:16   #9
leonardyan96

"Cassessory"
May 2017
Northern China

3516 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by James Heinrich Please don't suggest that as it loses all data about how the factor was found. As it says in the upper-right corner of the manual results page, if you find a problem with manual results reporting, please let me know directly so I can fix it. This is the first result I've seen with the new partial-stage-2 key which is why the result was not initially accepted. It is accepted now, I've asked George to fix the database so there's only 1 correct result for 115587421.
Thanks for your work and sorry for the inconvenience. Initially I thought it was a problem of mlucas instead of manual submission, so I decided to post it there.

2022-09-15, 04:17   #10
Prime95
P90 years forever!

Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

808410 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by leonardyan96 and sorry for the inconvenience.
No need to apologize -- always glad to squash a bug.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ONeil ONeil 49 2021-01-12 12:05 joejoefla GpuOwl 2 2020-11-01 22:20 preda Math 11 2018-09-08 03:03 pbunn Information & Answers 37 2013-04-22 21:41 swl551 GPU Computing 2 2012-12-20 15:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:47.

Tue Nov 29 08:47:53 UTC 2022 up 103 days, 6:16, 0 users, load averages: 1.09, 1.06, 1.01