20121104, 20:45  #1 
Nov 2012
2×7 Posts 
Prime Numbers Or Not
Dear Fellows,
According to the theorem 1379, would I submit to you this updated list of Prime Numbers, for Check. Thank you in advance for your time and interrest. 58426759 The 58,426,759th prime is 1,157,637,499. 73278467 The 73,278,467th prime is 1,469,439,821. 82965871 The 82,965,871st prime is 1,674,567,637. 92365877 The 92,365,877th prime is 1,874,755,481. 840354259 The 840,354,259th prime is 19,008,384,119. 72365879 The 72,365,879th prime is 1,450,177,357. 72383659 The 72,383,659th prime is 1,450,555,021. 79259461 The 79,259,461st prime is 1,595,921,027. 99259463 The 99,259,463rd prime is 2,022,200,491. 840,354,259 The 840,354,259th prime is 19,008,384,119. 1595921029 The 1,595,921,029th prime is 37,171,516,639. Best, 
20121104, 22:05  #2 
"Åke Tilander"
Apr 2011
Sandviken, Sweden
2×283 Posts 
I am not sure what you mean by "the theorem 1379", but all the numbers you mention are prime. If you want to you can easily check things like that using a webbased service like: http://www.numberempire.com/primenumbers.php
I have not verified if they have the ordenal you mention, but I am sure there are other webservices that can be used to verify that. I am not sure about what was your question, but please ask again if this was not an answer. Last fiddled with by aketilander on 20121104 at 22:08 
20121104, 22:20  #3  
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
2×3×23×61 Posts 
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 20121104 at 22:26 

20121104, 22:54  #4 
"Åke Tilander"
Apr 2011
Sandviken, Sweden
2×283 Posts 
So, using the webservice science_man mentioned I have now confirmed that they are all prime and they have the ordenal (are the nth) prime you mention. So your table is completely correct. I still don't know though what "the theorem 1379" is so maybe this is not an answer to your question?

20121105, 02:20  #5 
Aug 2006
1763_{16} Posts 
The only thing I can find which matches the name "Theorem 1379 is a crackpot paper by ChunXuan Jiang. I don't understand what it claims  the text, as written, is selfcontradictory  but its form suggests that the numbers to which it applies should be close to a multiple of a prime to the power of 2698.

20121105, 02:38  #6  
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
2×3×23×61 Posts 
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 20121105 at 02:41 

20121105, 02:57  #7  
Sep 2011
2^{2}×23 Posts 
Quote:


20121105, 03:49  #8  
Aug 2006
5,987 Posts 
Quote:


20121105, 03:58  #9 
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
3×23×149 Posts 
Ha ha ha! If my french (and google translator) does not cheat me, then this guy is don blazys in disguise. The name would justify it too, as is the same firerelated anagram (blaze, arson, I still believe the guy does this intentionally, as I can't imagine someone being so idiot). He claimes there that the 2^431126111 is prime or so, and when someone shows him that the exponent is composite (2671*16141) he switched his claims. If I understand right, the 1379 theorem has something to do with the fact that all primes ends in 1, 3, 7, or 9 .
(edit, crosspost with Mr. CRG) Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20121105 at 04:02 
20121105, 04:56  #10 
Aug 2006
5,987 Posts 
I think of Blazys as being on more of a highschool level, so if this is him it's not his best work. But my French is pretty poor, so I can't judge if that's Don.

20121105, 10:44  #11 
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria
100110100011_{2} Posts 
Posting statistics do not show a connection with Don Blazys.
@LarurV: no insults please, dubious math or not. Last fiddled with by akruppa on 20121105 at 16:40 Reason: Better avoid dubious vocabulary myself :/ 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
What can you do with 2 prime numbers?  VicDiesel  Programming  12  20170420 21:16 
Right Perfect Prime Numbers  Housemouse  Math  34  20160407 16:29 
All odd numbers are prime  Citrix  Lounge  5  20100405 21:34 
Old Gem Interview about prime numbers  diep  Lounge  3  20090805 21:01 
Prime numbers  Unregistered  Miscellaneous Math  8  20081109 07:45 