mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-11-27, 17:38   #2630
nitf
 
Dec 2020

22×3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I assume this is a fairly large proof file. Can you please PM or email me a link to the proof file and I'll investigate further.
It was fairly large - 462MB - but apparently it managed to make it through with repeated automated retries. I should have waited one more iteration.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	378433339-1.png
Views:	28
Size:	21.6 KB
ID:	27671  
nitf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-27, 18:31   #2631
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

1111111100012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
It was fairly large - 462MB - but apparently it managed to make it through with repeated automated retries. I should have waited one more iteration.
This is excellent -- you have tested (unintentionally) that the error-checking upload process is working correctly, and even though you had multiple upload errors it detected and retried them and finally succeeded.

It does seem quite a slow upload though -- is your internet connection slow in general, or do you have upload speed limited in Prime95?
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-27, 19:06   #2632
nitf
 
Dec 2020

22·3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
It does seem quite a slow upload though -- is your internet connection slow in general, or do you have upload speed limited in Prime95?
Unbeknownst to me until now, it was throttling upload speed under Options/Resource Limits.
nitf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-27, 19:38   #2633
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

11100110001002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitf View Post
It was fairly large - 462MB
473041738 bytes per your screen capture, or ~461,955 KiB. The difference between that and what I posted earlier (473,041,680) is for a handful of scalars in addition to the 10 full size residues. The header info is typically ~60 bytes.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-11-27 at 19:40
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-28, 01:36   #2634
slandrum
 
Jan 2021
California

10058 Posts
Default Here's another one where it says PRP without proof

This time I did the PRP, then the proof was automatically uploaded (about an hour later) and the CERT was run successfully on it. However the server says that it's PRP w/o proof running on "old software". While it's not the latest greatest version of Prime95, it's 30.7 which should not have any difference at all in PRP proof generation.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2022-11-27 172738.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	143.1 KB
ID:	27673  
slandrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-28, 02:25   #2635
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

7·11·53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slandrum View Post
the server says that it's PRP w/o proof running on "old software"
Thanks, fixed.

Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2022-11-28 at 02:25
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-28, 23:55   #2636
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
Behind BB

7×281 Posts
Default

Does the server accept P+1, stage-1-only, results? I tried to submit a file containing lines like this:

Code:
{"status":"NF", "exponent":581227, "worktype":"P+1", "b1":4000000, "start":"127/61", "fft-length":28672, "security-code":"XXXXXXXX", "program":{"name":"Prime95", "version":"30.9", "build":1, "port":8}, "timestamp":"2022-11-28 23:43:38"}
but they weren't accepted.

EDIT: The actual message from the manual submission page was "Did not understand 52 lines." with a box fill of the lines that were unknown.

Last fiddled with by masser on 2022-11-28 at 23:58
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-29, 00:11   #2637
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

7×11×53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by masser View Post
Does the server accept P+1, stage-1-only, results?
No. B1-only results are only accepted if a factor is found in stage-1.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-29, 01:05   #2638
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

22·2,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
No. B1-only results are only accepted if a factor is found in stage-1.
Dare I ask why this knowledge is not accepted? DoS seems unlikely.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-29, 01:15   #2639
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

7·11·53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Dare I ask why this knowledge is not accepted? DoS seems unlikely.
I'm not sure if it's a decision or an omission. I'll ask George for clarification when he gets back from vacation.
Is there a good reason why someone choosing to do such a specific worktype would choose to stop halfway and not do stage-2?

Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2022-11-29 at 01:16
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-11-29, 01:35   #2640
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
Behind BB

7×281 Posts
Default

On my 4-core cpus (haswell to coffee lake), stage 1 is faster with 4 workers (1 core per worker). Stage 2 is more convenient with 1 worker (dedicating most of system memory to stage 2). That's the reason for splitting. I don't have to report the intermediate stage 1 results, but I like to be thorough. When the server didn't accept the result, I thought perhaps a bug (or unconsidered case) had been found. (I think results from similar workflows are accepted for P-1, but I'll have to doublecheck. Yes, see here.)

Last fiddled with by masser on 2022-11-29 at 01:40
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:35.


Mon Jan 30 12:35:05 UTC 2023 up 165 days, 10:03, 0 users, load averages: 0.76, 0.98, 0.97

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔