mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-05-23, 11:02   #1
Glenio
 
May 2020

5 Posts
Default I think (wish) I find a new prime number record

hello i'm new to the forum and i discovered a new prime number how do i claim the reward?
Glenio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 11:41   #2
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

165F16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenio View Post
hello i'm new to the forum and i discovered a new prime number how do i claim the reward?
The first step is to post your number for verification.

You won't get anything unless you show us your number is both large enough and is prime.

Last fiddled with by retina on 2020-05-23 at 11:43
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 11:48   #3
Glenio
 
May 2020

58 Posts
Default Descobri um número primo maior que o atual

2^102589933:sorriso: já mandei a reedificação

MODERATOR NOTE: Moved from "Mersenne prime in a Cunningham chain" thread.

Note on current status: (assuming poster meant 2^102589933 - 1) Exponent status, No factors below 274

Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 2020-05-23 at 12:12 Reason: Note that post was moved; current info
Glenio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 11:55   #4
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

17×277 Posts
Default

Submit it here please: https://primes.utm.edu/primes/
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 11:59   #5
Glenio
 
May 2020

5 Posts
Exclamation This is the number

This is the number 2^102589933
Glenio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 13:34   #6
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

2·11·397 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenio View Post
This is the number 2^102589933
This number can not be prime, as it is divisible by 2. Actually, you can divide it by 2 about a hundred million times, and you still get integers all along, which are still not prime, none of them is prime.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 13:56   #7
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

2·32·5·72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenio View Post
This is the number 2^102589933
That number is composite (not prime) by definition. ba for b>1, a>1, a and b integer, is composite; b is a factor. This may win the prize for most obviously NOT prime (which is public embarrassment). It has one prime factor and over a hundred million distinct composite factors 21, 22, 23, ..., 2102589932.
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...65&postcount=3
It also happens to have a superficial relationship to the largest known Mersenne prime, 282589933-1, whose exponent is 20M less.
See also, for the perfect record of predicting large primes,by various means, https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...04&postcount=5
Possibilities, more likely first: Inaccurate post lacking +-c, trolling, combination, computation error, something else, new prime discovery.

In the very unlikely event that it's a Mersenne prime discovery, verification should have quietly occurred without posting an exponent, then announcement via MRI Inc. press release. https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...5&postcount=14

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-05-23 at 14:27
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 14:15   #8
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

2×1,697 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
That number is composite (not prime) by definition. ba for b>1, a>1, a and b integer, is composite; b is a factor. This may win the prize for most obviously NOT prime.
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...65&postcount=3
It also happens to have a superficial relationship to the largest known Mersenne prime, 282589933-1, whose exponent is 20M less.
See also, for the perfect record of predicting large primes,by various means, https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...04&postcount=5
The "8" --> "10" in the exponent would be beyond expectation. It would take a day on a GPU you to dismiss this claim, assuming P-1 does not turn up a factor.
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 14:28   #9
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

10001001110102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulunderwood View Post
The "8" --> "10" in the exponent would be beyond expectation. It would take a day on a GPU [for] you to dismiss this claim, assuming P-1 does not turn up a factor.
P-1 to full PrimeNet bounds on M102589933 under way here, will complete in hours. https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/102589933 says 5.6% probability of factor, no p-1 result reported yet. It would be silly to have primality tested it without doing that first.
Maybe he meant a Fermat number. That claim would be safe from computational attack for a while.
As stated in his post, a large power of two being prime, it's too absurd a claim to even bother including in the count in the "dubious claims" list behind the stats in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...04&postcount=5

There are few rhyming prime exponents surviving even cursory TF above M82589933.
102589933 NF 74, further TF assigned to gpu72, P-1 underway
112589933 small factor
222589933 small factor
232589933 NF 71, go to 79 assigned, no p-1 yet 2290000,68700000
312589933 small factors
532589933 smallish factor
612589933 smallish factor
642589933 NF 70, go to 84 assigned, no p-1 yet 5740000,172200000
652589933 NF 71, go to 84 assigned, no p-1 yet 5820000,174600000
672589933 smallish factors
702589933 small factors
892589933 smallish factor
912589933 smallish factor
952589933 small factors
(up to 999M)

The 3 other survivors are being addressed with TF and may get some P-1 attention after.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-05-23 at 15:25
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 18:02   #10
Glenio
 
May 2020

58 Posts
Exclamation Prime Number

70237298350549551468899 á is congruent with 1 (mod 4) and no cofactor is also known; therefore, there may still be a chance that 2 ^ 70237298350549551468899-1 is prime. This is just an example that I am taking into account.
Glenio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-23, 18:02   #11
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

32·5·191 Posts
Default

What software did you use to test it?
If you were using mprime or Prime95, email the save files to George Woltman.
If you used mlucas, contact Ernst Meyer with your save files.
Do you have any interim residues? Those would be helpful (we could have others test it and if there are mis-matches, we can see which 2 of 3 agree.)
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rough number behaviour close to record gaps robert44444uk Prime Gap Searches 1 2019-02-07 16:41
Can you find another number like 2200? goldbug Puzzles 31 2018-12-08 20:11
Test a Specific Exponent in Prime95. When it is 100% done, does it mean I find a new prime number? king Information & Answers 5 2018-02-21 18:15
find the missing number MattcAnderson Puzzles 10 2017-05-21 01:52
how do you find number of digits of a 2^n number? Unregistered Math 11 2004-11-30 22:53

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:13.

Mon Sep 21 04:13:48 UTC 2020 up 11 days, 1:24, 0 users, load averages: 2.21, 2.12, 1.72

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.