mersenneforum.org 2020 14e post processing reservations and results
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2020-07-12, 23:07   #320
Jarod
AKA Speedy51

Oct 2012
New Zealand

3×71 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jarod Corrected. And apologies for misspelling your name.
All good these things happen. I must admit I did think that's an interesting way of spelling my name :)

2020-07-12, 23:30   #321
swellman

Jun 2012

22×23×31 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jarod [When I start this job I get the following CODE]Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 found 38025 cycles, need 2210586 Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 too few cycles, matrix probably cannot build Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 filtering wants 1000000 more relations[/CODE] With just over 700,000 pending rels remaining. My question is does this job require more sleeving?
What target density did you use?

Mostly likely it needs more relations. I can bump Q up to 45M. That should be sufficient but please let us know if it won’t build.

ETA: Q bumped up to 45M

Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-07-12 at 23:56

2020-07-13, 00:05   #322
Jarod
AKA Speedy51

Oct 2012
New Zealand

21310 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by swellman What target density did you use? Mostly likely it needs more relations. I can bump Q up to 45M. That should be sufficient but please let us know if it won’t build. ETA: Q bumped up to 45M
My apologies I forgot to put I use TD=120 thanks for bumping up to 45 million

Last fiddled with by Jarod on 2020-07-13 at 00:07

 2020-07-13, 16:04 #323 chris2be8     Sep 2009 189010 Posts f87_127m1 is done: Code: p64 factor: 1626790518933699660217425990919548194494386752643800042237225909 p122 factor: 79690914546124921642855696713341754557981571816820049869720576804279343155757948015674135077156641333075494975013408957473 Summarised log at https://pastebin.com/tfapdkui And f17_202p1 has built a matrix. About 175 hours remain. Chris
2020-07-13, 22:05   #324
VBCurtis

"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

10D916 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jarod My apologies I forgot to put I use TD=120 thanks for bumping up to 45 million
Small jobs don't benefit much from high target densities. Try TD =108 and TD = 120 once you have the new up-to-45M relations, and see for yourself. Even TD = 100 is unlikely to take more than an hour more to solve the matrix than TD =120.

2020-07-14, 00:48   #325
Jarod
AKA Speedy51

Oct 2012
New Zealand

21310 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by VBCurtis Small jobs don't benefit much from high target densities. Try TD =108 and TD = 120 once you have the new up-to-45M relations, and see for yourself. Even TD = 100 is unlikely to take more than an hour more to solve the matrix than TD =120.
Thank you for your input. I managed to start job with a TD116 to do that LA phase it's going to take.
Code:
Tue Jul 14 11:43:55 2020  commencing Lanczos iteration (23 threads)
Tue Jul 14 11:43:55 2020  memory use: 2270.0 MB
Tue Jul 14 11:44:00 2020  linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 2h55m
Tue Jul 14 11:44:02 2020  checkpointing every 1230000 dimensions
This is slightly longer than the "hour" you refer to solve matrix, I like to do the LA phase of the job in the shortest amount of time.
Roughly 35% complete with a 1 hour 55 minutes to go

2020-07-14, 03:31   #326
Jarod
AKA Speedy51

Oct 2012
New Zealand

21310 Posts
223__727_5m1 Factors

I ended up running number with a TD116 took just over 3 hours and 37 minutes. Find zipped log attached
Code:
p51 factor: 165575181446411460205828705575691615869005925901441
p106 factor: 7185207381967777817292364114317982628364500160381105212878698339416404696843526675114572666774815941222461
I have added to factor database

Log file at https://pastebin.com/qRdDQj6z
Attached Files
 223__727_5m1.zip (4.8 KB, 5 views)

Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-07-15 at 00:32

2020-07-14, 08:08   #327
VBCurtis

"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

10000110110012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jarod [/CODE]This is slightly longer than the "hour" you refer to solve matrix, I like to do the LA phase of the job in the shortest amount of time. Roughly 35% complete with a 1 hour 55 minutes to go
You misunderstood- I said a lower TD would take less than an hour MORE than TD 120. I made no promises about how long the whole job would take!! (How could I, since I don't know your hardware?)

If you try the same job with TD 104 or 100, I wager the ETA won't change by more than 10%.

2020-07-14, 20:32   #328
Jarod
AKA Speedy51

Oct 2012
New Zealand

3·71 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by VBCurtis You misunderstood- I said a lower TD would take less than an hour MORE than TD 120. I made no promises about how long the whole job would take!! (How could I, since I don't know your hardware?) If you try the same job with TD 104 or 100, I wager the ETA won't change by more than 10%.
Very good point. Thank you for explaining I understand now and please accept my apologies

 2020-07-15, 20:09 #329 richs     "Rich" Aug 2002 Benicia, California 11·103 Posts Taking 34273_47m1
 2020-07-15, 21:17 #330 Dylan14     "Dylan" Mar 2017 29 Posts 161__587_11m1 is complete: Code: p59 factor: 36778639042250276737180660715318318816446030763271760319767 p137 factor: 23271003117104552433045463135485356432737154412158961286536399265666994289322759380793527863879761875512472866413211692274177854056752279 TD 120 built a 3.73 M matrix which took 5.57 hours to solve (TD 130 didn't work). Log posted at https://pastebin.com/zY842gvE and https://github.com/Dylan1496/nfs-at-...__587_11m1.log. Taking 7503751_31m1 next.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post swellman NFS@Home 862 2019-12-31 10:51 swellman NFS@Home 220 2019-12-28 16:40 fivemack NFS@Home 221 2019-01-04 13:08 pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 551 2019-01-04 13:06 xilman NFSNET Discussion 3 2003-11-06 14:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:53.

Tue Sep 22 00:53:33 UTC 2020 up 11 days, 22:04, 0 users, load averages: 1.91, 1.71, 1.59