mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > FactorDB

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-12-06, 02:29   #23
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

5×227 Posts
Default

I have one core of an i3 working on 81 digits.
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-06, 03:41   #24
mathwiz
 
Mar 2019

2·32·5 Posts
Default

Seems like some low exponent Mersenne factors were missing from FDB too?
mathwiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-06, 05:50   #25
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

A1416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathwiz View Post
Seems like some low exponent Mersenne factors were missing from FDB too?
Yes, there were a lot of cases with exponents below 15000 where FactorDB forgot the connection between a composite number and its factors. For example, 2^293-1 was listed as an 89-digit composite number even though its 26-digit factor 40122362455616221971122353 was already in the database. And several hundred more examples. Edit: and exponent 34499, 49081, 57329, 57383 and maybe some others...

There were also about a dozen factors for exponents in the 30k and 40k ranges that were discovered in November and December but not in FactorDB. Either not reported yet or forgotten during the outage.

Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2019-12-06 at 07:06
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-06, 09:26   #26
kosta
 
Jan 2013

23×7 Posts
Default torrent?

So, what's with the idea of a factordb torrent? If it is only 1GB then it should not be too hard right? Seems like it would potentially open up all kind of useful and not so useful derivative projects.
kosta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-07, 20:14   #27
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22×33×31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
I have one core of an i3 working on 81 digits.
Are you working randomly or at the low end?

I'm playing with several things that may drift into the 81 digit area as 80 digits fall below 5000. Should I modify my scripts to work further into 81 digits or move to 82 digits?
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-07, 21:47   #28
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

100011011112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
Are you working randomly or at the low end?

I'm playing with several things that may drift into the 81 digit area as 80 digits fall below 5000. Should I modify my scripts to work further into 81 digits or move to 82 digits?
My python script is choosing randomly from the first 100 C81's. I've had 33 worker collisions in the first 1293 composites that I've done.
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-07, 22:44   #29
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

1001101001112 Posts
Default

Slowly checking aliquot sequences <1M I've found that 933564 is absent in the FDB.
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-08, 00:39   #30
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

7·353 Posts
Default

In addition to previous post:

Code:
$ ./aliqueit -t 933564
 Reading config file...
Verifying elf 933564
Verifying index 129... 
ERROR: @index 129: value != sigma - n
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-08, 04:03   #31
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22·33·31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
My python script is choosing randomly from the first 100 C81's. I've had 33 worker collisions in the first 1293 composites that I've done.
Some of those might have been my scripts. I completed 1108 in a window of 5000. So a few of those may have been in the low end of 81. I shouldn't hit 81 at all now, but I hope to work on 82 digits some tomorrow. I still expect to work on the 80s testing my latest Colab experiment, using the GPU branch of ECM and msieve, but not so aggressively as today.

Sorry about that. . .
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-08, 15:09   #32
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

21578 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
Some of those might have been my scripts. I completed 1108 in a window of 5000. So a few of those may have been in the low end of 81. I shouldn't hit 81 at all now, but I hope to work on 82 digits some tomorrow. I still expect to work on the 80s testing my latest Colab experiment, using the GPU branch of ECM and msieve, but not so aggressively as today.

Sorry about that. . .
No problem at all.
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-09, 03:10   #33
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

D1416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
No problem at all.
Well, now I'm really sorry! A machine I didn't even remember was running composites apparently finished off the 80s and moved into the 81s. I "think" I now have "all" of my machines working in the 82 area. I plan on leaving them there until I put them back to their normal work.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spammers in FactorDB wpolly FactorDB 5 2019-04-16 11:19
A suggestion for factordb. enzocreti FactorDB 0 2018-03-02 09:12
Extending Factordb carpetpool FactorDB 6 2017-01-23 11:04
FactorDB PRP's smh FactorDB 231 2015-07-28 02:30
FactorDB question Raman Factoring 15 2010-01-28 10:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:45.

Sun Sep 27 23:45:32 UTC 2020 up 17 days, 20:56, 0 users, load averages: 1.48, 1.50, 1.43

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.