mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-08-03, 03:13   #2652
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×19×263 Posts
Default

My DCs have crossed over from 40M to 41M.
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-05, 01:03   #2653
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

2·1,637 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rudy235 View Post
There are only 7 remaining exponents to complete the 73M milestone

However this one will expire before completion.

72989101 LL LL, 63.10% 14 29 2017-05-18 2017-08-02 2017-08-03 2017-08-31 Kent Freeze
©1996-2017 Mersenne Research, Inc. Current time: 2017-08-02 17:49 UTC - Page rendered in 0.0518s
There are 4 left, 3 of which won't finish in time (good job, ATH, on the one that actually will finish). That's based on my analysis of their past progress... they fall into that category of "mystery machines that check in daily but report no progress for days or weeks on end"

I'm not saying I'm poaching those 3 exponents, but don't be surprised if someone magically turns in results for those just before they expire.

Here's my analysis of the *actual* days-to-complete for these 3, just based on the average %/day of those assignments.
72831991 - 113.3 days (expires in 4 days)
72893621 - 394.2 days (expires in 10 days)
72989101 - 34 days (expires in 11 days)
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-05, 05:12   #2654
rudy235
 
rudy235's Avatar
 
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.

312 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
There are 4 left, 3 of which won't finish in time (good job, ATH, on the one that actually will finish). That's based on my analysis of their past progress... they fall into that category of "mystery machines that check in daily but report no progress for days or weeks on end"

I'm not saying I'm poaching those 3 exponents, but don't be surprised if someone magically turns in results for those just before they expire.

Here's my analysis of the *actual* days-to-complete for these 3, just based on the average %/day of those assignments.
72831991 - 113.3 days (expires in 4 days)
72893621 - 394.2 days (expires in 10 days)
72989101 - 34 days (expires in 11 days)
I am not poaching those either, however, I will not cry or decry if (when) someone else does.
rudy235 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-05, 09:57   #2655
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

2·32·163 Posts
Default

The server has no faith in us It expect us to take 26 months just for 521 exponents:

Quote:
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 75M: 521 (Estimated completion : 2019-10-07)

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-08-05 at 10:03
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-05, 15:54   #2656
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

2×1,637 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
The server has no faith in us It expect us to take 26 months just for 521 exponents:
LOL... it's just the latest "estimated time to completion" of all the exponents in that range.

Those client estimates are usually wrong anyway, and if a client stops reporting in then it's even more useless so I'm not entirely sure that milestone page should even report that. Oh well.
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-05, 21:43   #2657
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

25·179 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
Those client estimates are usually wrong anyway, and if a client stops reporting in then it's even more useless so I'm not entirely sure that milestone page should even report that. Oh well.
It was suggested many posts ago that those useless estimated completion dates be removed. They serve no purpose whatsoever. Might as well just post random numbers, they would make as much sense IMO.

I'm all in favour of showing more details (instead of whitespace and so-called "clean" layouts) but when those details are useless then they should be removed, or replaced with something else that actually conveys information.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-06, 11:45   #2658
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

25·3·7·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
It was suggested...
+1
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-07, 00:34   #2659
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

2×1,637 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
It was suggested many posts ago that those useless estimated completion dates be removed. They serve no purpose whatsoever. Might as well just post random numbers, they would make as much sense IMO.

I'm all in favour of showing more details (instead of whitespace and so-called "clean" layouts) but when those details are useless then they should be removed, or replaced with something else that actually conveys information.
I'll take a look at it, maybe think about whether there's anything else useful I could put there instead.

FYI, I turned in the last 3 results for the < 73M exponents. They weren't going to finish in time, that much was clear. Now they can just turn in their double-check in however many days or years they'll actually take.
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-07, 12:30   #2660
KEP
Quasi Admin Thing
 
KEP's Avatar
 
May 2005

92310 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madpoo View Post
I'll take a look at it, maybe think about whether there's anything else useful I could put there instead.

FYI, I turned in the last 3 results for the < 73M exponents. They weren't going to finish in time, that much was clear. Now they can just turn in their double-check in however many days or years they'll actually take.
Just a few suggestions - such as a countdown to n=100M and a countdown to n=332192809 (100M digits)

:)
KEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-13, 10:27   #2661
NBtarheel_33
 
NBtarheel_33's Avatar
 
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA

45B16 Posts
Default

The top two lines of this report can now be merged.
NBtarheel_33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-08-13, 20:35   #2662
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

2·1,637 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBtarheel_33 View Post
The top two lines of this report can now be merged.
I'm not sure what the original thinking was of those breakpoints in the chart. I thought maybe it was based on the average FFT size used for those exponents or something like that (except for the large 0-35.1M section).
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newer X64 build needed Googulator Msieve 73 2020-08-30 07:47
Performance of cuda-ecm on newer hardware? fivemack GMP-ECM 14 2015-02-12 20:10
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread bcp19 Data 30 2012-09-08 15:09
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7 mklasson Msieve 9 2009-02-18 12:58
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels Dresdenboy Software 3 2003-12-08 14:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:29.

Tue Sep 22 21:29:12 UTC 2020 up 12 days, 18:40, 0 users, load averages: 1.35, 1.49, 1.57

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.