20100407, 17:48  #1  
Nov 2008
2×3^{3}×43 Posts 
Fast factorization method or crankery?
Someone has created a project called GIFFS  Great Internet Fast Factorization Search  to "search" for a way of working out the factors of n from the factors of n1. The homepage is here.
I haven't looked through it all, but the fact that they say Quote:


20100407, 18:25  #2  
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×2,969 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:


20100407, 18:30  #3 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2·23·137 Posts 
So, it is dead because it has few members, or it has few members because it is dead? Which comes first, the chicken or the egg?
Last fiddled with by retina on 20100407 at 18:31 Reason: My gramdma would have not approved of my grammar. 
20100407, 18:32  #4 
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×2,969 Posts 

20100407, 20:58  #5 
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
2B13_{16} Posts 

20100408, 02:19  #6 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
2·23·137 Posts 

20100408, 11:51  #7 
Nov 2003
2^{2}×5×373 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
amorosi  new fast factorization not deterministic  Alberico Lepore  Alberico Lepore  5  20180119 11:38 
improving factorization method  bhelmes  Computer Science & Computational Number Theory  7  20170626 02:20 
New factorization method  henryzz  Miscellaneous Math  4  20170413 12:41 
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast  there is no question!)  jasong  jasong  35  20161211 00:57 
"prime numbers formula" crankery  MiniGeek  Miscellaneous Math  12  20090304 16:51 