mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-12-29, 18:36   #177
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22·23·31 Posts
Default Sierp Base 3

Sierp Base 3 Range = 300M-310M
Conjectured k = 125,050,976,086
Covering Set = 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 37, 41, 193, 757
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2)

Found Primes: 3,589,061k's - File emailed

Remaining k's: 507k's - Tested to n=2.5K - File emailed

MOB Eliminations: 41,193,757k's - File emailed

Files emailed

Range released
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-30, 07:49   #178
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

22×5×11×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
Sierp Base 3 Range = 300M-310M
Conjectured k = 125,050,976,086
Covering Set = 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 37, 41, 193, 757
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2)

Found Primes: 3,589,061k's - File emailed

Remaining k's: 507k's - Tested to n=2.5K - File emailed

MOB Eliminations: 41,193,757k's - File emailed

Files emailed

Range released

Wow, 41M+ MOB eliminations for a k=10M range. That's amazing. Your file shows 1,410,432 MOB eliminations.

I won't be able to show these on the pages since it's a large-conjectured base with the k-range only searched to n=2500.

If anyone would like to search Sierp base 3 k=300M-310M for n=2.5K to 25K (or to 10K), then I could show it on the pages.

Attached are the 507 k's remaining at n=2500.


Gary
Attached Files
File Type: zip remain-sierp-base3-300M-310M-2.5K.zip (2.3 KB, 64 views)

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-12-30 at 07:50
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-30, 17:19   #179
KEP
Quasi Admin Thing
 
KEP's Avatar
 
May 2005

22·241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Wow, 41M+ MOB eliminations for a k=10M range. That's amazing. Your file shows 1,410,432 MOB eliminations.

I won't be able to show these on the pages since it's a large-conjectured base with the k-range only searched to n=2500.

If anyone would like to search Sierp base 3 k=300M-310M for n=2.5K to 25K (or to 10K), then I could show it on the pages.

Attached are the 507 k's remaining at n=2500.


Gary
I'll do it to n=25K. As previously mentioned, please take your startups for the smaller bases to at least n=25K, since it doesn't mean very much more work

KEP
KEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-31, 14:11   #180
KEP
Quasi Admin Thing
 
KEP's Avatar
 
May 2005

22·241 Posts
Default

The range: k>300M >k k<=310M is complete to n=25K. 464 primes were found and verified and double, heck even triple checked. There is a total of 43 k's remaining all listed in the attached file.

Regards

KEP
Attached Files
File Type: zip SierpBase3_300-310M_n=25K.zip (3.7 KB, 62 views)
KEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-14, 04:05   #181
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default Sierp Base 3

Sierp Base 3 Range = 310M-330M
Conjectured k = 125,050,976,086
Covering Set = 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 37, 41, 193, 757
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2)

Found Primes: 7,176,408k's - File emailed

Remaining k's: 91k's - Tested to n=25K - File emailed

MOB Eliminations: 2,823,501k's - File emailed

compPRP: 25k's - File emailed

Range released
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-09, 20:53   #182
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22·23·31 Posts
Default

Sierp Base 3 - Range 330M-340M
Conjectured k = 125,050,976,086
Covering Set = 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 37, 41, 193, 757
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2)

Found Primes: 3587632k's - File emailed

Remaining: 60k's - File emailed - Tested to n=25K

MOB Eliminations: 1412308k's - File emailed

Range Released

compPRP
333202810*3^4+1
333388184*3^67+1
333401180*3^5+1
334374110*3^4+1
335181778*3^6+1
335276768*3^4+1
335550520*3^55+1
335556080*3^4+1
336267398*3^79+1
336787876*3^3+1
338344760*3^5+1
338945294*3^5+1
338985326*3^71+1
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-09, 21:10   #183
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

11×571 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
compPRP
333202810*3^4+1
333388184*3^67+1
333401180*3^5+1
334374110*3^4+1
335181778*3^6+1
335276768*3^4+1
335550520*3^55+1
335556080*3^4+1
336267398*3^79+1
336787876*3^3+1
338344760*3^5+1
338945294*3^5+1
338985326*3^71+1
Were you using PFGW? If so, which version?
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-09, 22:19   #184
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Were you using PFGW? If so, which version?
I'm using WinPFGW 3.3.1. Primes were found for all the compPRP's.
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-10, 05:29   #185
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

22×5×11×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
I'm using WinPFGW 3.3.1. Primes were found for all the compPRP's.
Can you clarify? I assume that you mean that primes were found for all k's where there was a composite PRP, correct? Not...that the composite PRP's themselves turned out to be prime when tested with other software.

The GWNUM libraries still seem to have a bug. I'm not going to test them here but I'll make a prediction: All of the compPRP's with an exponent < 50 are actually composite but the compPRP's with an exponent >= 50 are actually prime. So the n<50 compPRPs are correct as shown. Of course this doesn't make a difference for the proof of the conjecture since it appears that you found higher primes for all of the k's.

I have found tons of compPRP's on Sierp base 63 with an exponent >= 100 that turned out to actually be prime. As a matter of fact, just like for base 3 with an exponent >=50, ALL compPRP's on Sierp base 63 with an exponent >= 100 turned out to be prime. There were no composites. In several cases, the k shows as remaining at n=1000 and I had to go back and test the compPRP with other software just to make sure that the k could be removed.

This is not a bug in the starting bases script because I've hopped through many hoops to attempt to prove PRP's correctly. The GWNUM libraries themselves need to be fixed. I have 10s and now, probably even a couple of hundred examples of them on both bases 3 and 63.

BTW, as a point of reference on speed and proving PRPs: I use trial factoring of 35% (-f35) on base 3 to n=25K and 10% (-f10) on base 63 to n=1K. If you drop it much lower than that on base 3, you'll get PRPs (that are actually prime) that for some reason, PFGW cannot prove. In other words, it doesn't prove them prime nor does it prove them composite. In all cases, I found these PRPs to be prime but it's a nuisunce so it's best to put the trial factoring high enough to avoid them completely. (BTW, because of this, the starting bases script ASSUMES that unprovable PRPs that also cannot be proven composite are prime and hence, are also written to the primes file. Nevertheless, these PRPs would need to be proven by other software. These are fairly rare unless you use very low trial factoring so don't worry about it if it isn't clear.)


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-05-10 at 05:38
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-10, 06:25   #186
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Can you clarify? I assume that you mean that primes were found for all k's where there was a composite PRP, correct?
That is correct.
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-10, 12:35   #187
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

11000100010012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
I'm using WinPFGW 3.3.1. Primes were found for all the compPRP's.
You need to upgrade to 3.3.3 (in the minimum). PFGW was upgraded to use gwnum 25.14 in that release. The problems you are describing are most likely fixed in 3.3.4 based upon this change in gwnum:

Code:
More conservative in selecting an FFT length for non-base-2 cases.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes KEP Conjectures 'R Us 1090 2021-04-15 11:56
Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes Siemelink Conjectures 'R Us 1682 2021-04-13 23:50
Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 895 2021-04-11 08:17
Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 2276 2021-04-08 18:12
Bases 4-32 reservations/statuses/primes gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 1431 2021-02-18 16:05

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:00.

Thu Apr 15 15:00:02 UTC 2021 up 7 days, 9:40, 0 users, load averages: 1.58, 2.01, 2.18

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.