20191213, 01:44  #12 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
1010000100101_{2} Posts 
Now that the matrix for 2330L is nearly complete, and I'm looking for a next Big Project, I notice we never got 'round to poly select for this candidate.
Who is interested in a teamCADO (I=15, ~3GB/process) project to factor this? I plan to get started on the poly select this weekend, using CADO. Any GPUmsieve searchers should reserve a c5range per usual. The RSA240 factorization announcement implies that CADO has gotten a fair bit faster during 2019; I'm not yet sure which of the speed improvements are from better param choices and which are from siever improvements, so I don't know just yet whether we're looking at a 25 coreyear sieve job or 40. For reference, we did 2330L, a c207, in just under 100 threadyears; but most of those were hyperthreaded so call it 50 coreyears. 
20191213, 05:42  #13  
Nov 2003
1D24_{16} Posts 
Quote:


20191213, 06:04  #14 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
1001110001110_{2} Posts 
Curtis, Iโm always up to a new challenge, count me in, not sure about my friends at SETI.USA and The Scottish teams.

20191213, 19:11  #15 
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
11132_{10} Posts 

20191213, 19:52  #16 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
1425_{16} Posts 
2,1165+ is C217. Could someone confirm that Greg will run this?
This "should" be above the cutoff between deg 5 and deg 6, with CADO's better deg 6 polys. I'm game to set a new record poly score. I'll start a thread for poly select coordination for 2,1165+. However, poly select isn't a Big Project. I'm still looking for a C198C205 to run as a CADOteamfactorization, and the number from this thread title fills the bill as well as any I know of. Is there a C200203 Fibonacci number available instead? I'd like a slightly smaller candidate, to gain experience; perhaps one Fibonacci and this C204 before we attack something C210+? EDIT: 2,2210M has a poly select thread, and quite a bit of work done. The last post in that thread stated Greg will solve it by SNFS. I thought that closed the matter...? Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20191213 at 19:54 
20191213, 19:57  #17 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2·2,503 Posts 
2,1165+ , sieve completed by NFS@Home.
Sieving: 2,1157+ Queued: 2,1144+, 2,2158L, 2,2330M Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 20191213 at 20:03 
20191213, 20:03  #18 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3^{3}·191 Posts 
Sounds like Greg is already handling the two proposed alternatives, so I return to starting poly select tomorrow on 3,748+.

20191213, 20:06  #19  
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2·2,503 Posts 
Quote:
I would get on touch with Greg regarding 2,2330M because it is queued on the status page but not on the wus side (generation side). Is he expecting a poly from here? 

20191213, 20:07  #20 
Nov 2003
2^{2}·5·373 Posts 

20191213, 20:09  #21  
Nov 2003
16444_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I was under the impression that polyselect had been started, but not finished. 

20191213, 20:12  #22  
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2·2,503 Posts 
Quote:
Thought I have seen it a couple of weeks ago whilst crunching for NFS@Home but I might be wrong. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Using 16e on smaller numbers  fivemack  Factoring  3  20170919 08:52 
NFS on smaller numbers?  skan  YAFU  6  20130226 13:57 
Bernoulli(200) c204  akruppa  Factoring  114  20120820 14:01 
checking smaller number  fortega  Data  2  20050616 22:48 
Factoring Smaller Numbers  marc  Factoring  6  20041009 14:17 