mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Cunningham Tables

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-12-13, 01:44   #12
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

10100001001012 Posts
Default

Now that the matrix for 2330L is nearly complete, and I'm looking for a next Big Project, I notice we never got 'round to poly select for this candidate.

Who is interested in a team-CADO (I=15, ~3GB/process) project to factor this?

I plan to get started on the poly select this weekend, using CADO. Any GPU-msieve searchers should reserve a c5-range per usual.

The RSA-240 factorization announcement implies that CADO has gotten a fair bit faster during 2019; I'm not yet sure which of the speed improvements are from better param choices and which are from siever improvements, so I don't know just yet whether we're looking at a 25 core-year sieve job or 40. For reference, we did 2330L, a c207, in just under 100 thread-years; but most of those were hyperthreaded so call it 50 core-years.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 05:42   #13
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

1D2416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Now that the matrix for 2330L is nearly complete, and I'm looking for a next Big Project, I notice we never got 'round to poly select for this candidate.

Who is interested in a team-CADO (I=15, ~3GB/process) project to factor this?

I plan to get started on the poly select this weekend, using CADO. Any GPU-msieve searchers should reserve a c5-range per usual.

The RSA-240 factorization announcement implies that CADO has gotten a fair bit faster during 2019; I'm not yet sure which of the speed improvements are from better param choices and which are from siever improvements, so I don't know just yet whether we're looking at a 25 core-year sieve job or 40. For reference, we did 2330L, a c207, in just under 100 thread-years; but most of those were hyperthreaded so call it 50 core-years.
Did the forum polyselect for 2,1165+ or 2,2210M? I don't believe so.......
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 06:04   #14
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

10011100011102 Posts
Default

Curtis, Iโ€™m always up to a new challenge, count me in, not sure about my friends at SETI.USA and The Scottish teams.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 19:11   #15
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"๐’‰บ๐’ŒŒ๐’‡ท๐’†ท๐’€ญ"
May 2003
Down not across

1113210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Did the forum polyselect for 2,1165+ or 2,2210M? I don't believe so.......
I'm with Bob here.

Let's finish the "traditional" Cunningham tables asap.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 19:52   #16
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

142516 Posts
Default

2,1165+ is C217. Could someone confirm that Greg will run this?
This "should" be above the cutoff between deg 5 and deg 6, with CADO's better deg 6 polys. I'm game to set a new record poly score.
I'll start a thread for poly select coordination for 2,1165+.

However, poly select isn't a Big Project. I'm still looking for a C198-C205 to run as a CADO-team-factorization, and the number from this thread title fills the bill as well as any I know of. Is there a C200-203 Fibonacci number available instead? I'd like a slightly smaller candidate, to gain experience; perhaps one Fibonacci and this C204 before we attack something C210+?

EDIT: 2,2210M has a poly select thread, and quite a bit of work done. The last post in that thread stated Greg will solve it by SNFS. I thought that closed the matter...?

Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2019-12-13 at 19:54
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 19:57   #17
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

2·2,503 Posts
Default

2,1165+ , sieve completed by NFS@Home.


Sieving: 2,1157+
Queued: 2,1144+, 2,2158L, 2,2330M

Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2019-12-13 at 20:03
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 20:03   #18
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

33·191 Posts
Default

Sounds like Greg is already handling the two proposed alternatives, so I return to starting poly select tomorrow on 3,748+.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 20:06   #19
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

2·2,503 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Sounds like Greg is already handling the two proposed alternatives, so I return to starting poly select tomorrow on 3,748+.

I would get on touch with Greg regarding 2,2330M because it is queued on the status page but not on the wus side (generation side). Is he expecting a poly from here?
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 20:07   #20
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
2,1165+ , sieve completed by NFS@Home.


Sieving: 2,1157+
Queued: 2,1144+, 2,2158L, 2,2330M
I never saw 2,1165+ running. I think Greg skipped over it to do 2,1157+.
The jobs seemed to go directly from running 2,1084+ to running 2,1157+.

Perhaps I am blind???
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 20:09   #21
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

164448 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
2,1165+ is C217. Could someone confirm that Greg will run this?
This "should" be above the cutoff between deg 5 and deg 6, with CADO's better deg 6 polys. I'm game to set a new record poly score.
I'll start a thread for poly select coordination for 2,1165+.

However, poly select isn't a Big Project. I'm still looking for a C198-C205 to run as a CADO-team-factorization, and the number from this thread title fills the bill as well as any I know of. Is there a C200-203 Fibonacci number available instead? I'd like a slightly smaller candidate, to gain experience; perhaps one Fibonacci and this C204 before we attack something C210+?

EDIT: 2,2210M has a poly select thread, and quite a bit of work done. The last post in that thread stated Greg will solve it by SNFS. I thought that closed the matter...?
I had previously asked about 2,2210M. It is not currently queued on the status page.
I was under the impression that polyselect had been started, but not finished.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-12-13, 20:12   #22
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

2·2,503 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
I never saw 2,1165+ running. I think Greg skipped over it to do 2,1157+.
The jobs seemed to go directly from running 2,1084+ to running 2,1157+.

Perhaps I am blind???

Thought I have seen it a couple of weeks ago whilst crunching for NFS@Home but I might be wrong.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using 16e on smaller numbers fivemack Factoring 3 2017-09-19 08:52
NFS on smaller numbers? skan YAFU 6 2013-02-26 13:57
Bernoulli(200) c204 akruppa Factoring 114 2012-08-20 14:01
checking smaller number fortega Data 2 2005-06-16 22:48
Factoring Smaller Numbers marc Factoring 6 2004-10-09 14:17

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:25.


Fri Jan 21 15:25:10 UTC 2022 up 182 days, 9:54, 0 users, load averages: 1.52, 1.34, 1.26

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

โ‰  ยฑ โˆ“ รท ร— ยท โˆ’ โˆš โ€ฐ โŠ— โŠ• โŠ– โŠ˜ โŠ™ โ‰ค โ‰ฅ โ‰ฆ โ‰ง โ‰จ โ‰ฉ โ‰บ โ‰ป โ‰ผ โ‰ฝ โŠ โŠ โŠ‘ โŠ’ ยฒ ยณ ยฐ
โˆ  โˆŸ ยฐ โ‰… ~ โ€– โŸ‚ โซ›
โ‰ก โ‰œ โ‰ˆ โˆ โˆž โ‰ช โ‰ซ โŒŠโŒ‹ โŒˆโŒ‰ โˆ˜ โˆ โˆ โˆ‘ โˆง โˆจ โˆฉ โˆช โจ€ โŠ• โŠ— ๐–• ๐–– ๐–— โŠฒ โŠณ
โˆ… โˆ– โˆ โ†ฆ โ†ฃ โˆฉ โˆช โŠ† โŠ‚ โŠ„ โŠŠ โŠ‡ โŠƒ โŠ… โŠ‹ โŠ– โˆˆ โˆ‰ โˆ‹ โˆŒ โ„• โ„ค โ„š โ„ โ„‚ โ„ต โ„ถ โ„ท โ„ธ ๐“Ÿ
ยฌ โˆจ โˆง โŠ• โ†’ โ† โ‡’ โ‡ โ‡” โˆ€ โˆƒ โˆ„ โˆด โˆต โŠค โŠฅ โŠข โŠจ โซค โŠฃ โ€ฆ โ‹ฏ โ‹ฎ โ‹ฐ โ‹ฑ
โˆซ โˆฌ โˆญ โˆฎ โˆฏ โˆฐ โˆ‡ โˆ† ฮด โˆ‚ โ„ฑ โ„’ โ„“
๐›ข๐›ผ ๐›ฃ๐›ฝ ๐›ค๐›พ ๐›ฅ๐›ฟ ๐›ฆ๐œ€๐œ– ๐›ง๐œ ๐›จ๐œ‚ ๐›ฉ๐œƒ๐œ— ๐›ช๐œ„ ๐›ซ๐œ… ๐›ฌ๐œ† ๐›ญ๐œ‡ ๐›ฎ๐œˆ ๐›ฏ๐œ‰ ๐›ฐ๐œŠ ๐›ฑ๐œ‹ ๐›ฒ๐œŒ ๐›ด๐œŽ ๐›ต๐œ ๐›ถ๐œ ๐›ท๐œ™๐œ‘ ๐›ธ๐œ’ ๐›น๐œ“ ๐›บ๐œ”