![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29×41 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Mar 2005
Internet; Ukraine, Kiev
11·37 Posts |
I will put as many machines as possible to sieving -- 3 at most.
Athlon 1800Mhz, Athlon64 1800Mhz, Celeron 1200Mhz. I can also take the bookkeeping task: collecting files with factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Oct 2005
Italy
33910 Posts |
I'd like to start the sieving of an exponent from scratch, for example the next after n=333,333.
I regularly will upload pre-sieved files on site twinprimesearch.org (pre-sieved files for n=333,333 coming from somebody else and pre-sieved files for n=xxx,xxx coming from me) Is it possible ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Dec 2006
1000012 Posts |
Hmm, there are some 333.333 primes with pretty high k-values reported : http://primes.utm.edu/bios/code.php?code=L214 . Could be some competition from david broadhurst. Let's see if there are some more primes coming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Mar 2004
3·127 Posts |
Quote:
Everyone is free to to find own primes... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| n=333333 Twin Found! | Kosmaj | Twin Prime Search | 12 | 2009-08-14 13:10 |
| What if we don't find twin prime n=333333? | cipher | Twin Prime Search | 5 | 2009-04-16 21:53 |
| n=333333 off the list | TimSorbet | No Prime Left Behind | 2 | 2008-05-13 17:26 |
| After n=333333, our next exponent will be... (revised poll) | MooMoo2 | Twin Prime Search | 24 | 2007-02-01 06:30 |