![]() |
|
|
#89 | |
|
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006
1,181 Posts |
Quote:
- Number of users: 287 - Number of users who tested at least 1M: 129 - Number of users who found at least 1 prime: 91 - Number of non-twin primes found: 551 - Number of primes found by PrimeGrid: 353 - Number of primes found by TPS: 198 - Number of ranges complete: 1176M by TPS, 2150M by PrimeGrid, 3326M total - Number of candidates tested: 1,197,360 - Average prime density: 1 prime every 6.04M - Total amount of computing power: 375 P-90 CPU years (or 3.61 Pentium 4 CPU years (3.4 GHz)) - Days needed to find a twin: 277 - Time needed to find a twin: 9 months and 2 days - Average prime discovery rate: 1.99 primes per day - Average range completion rate: 12.01M per day - Progress towards completing the whole 25G range: 13.30% - Probability that a twin would be discovered after searching only 2796M: 22.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Nov 2006
Earth
26 Posts |
Quote:
While it's not all that important, the real stats at the time of the twin find lie somewhere between the estimated and complete stats. Anyways, it only affects primes found and tests completed...and a few of the percentages. What's important is that a record twin was found!!! p.s. The "Probability that a twin would be discovered" was not updated in the complete stats. Also, the M completed was 2207 and not 2150M. As the sieve depth got deeper, the density of k per M changed. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Somebody made a numerical mistake | Arkadiusz | Math | 20 | 2009-12-22 16:07 |
| What every American should be made to learn about | garo | Soap Box | 18 | 2009-09-07 10:06 |
| You would-be sleuths made it much harder... | ewmayer | Lounge | 6 | 2008-09-17 18:09 |
| less v4 reservations being made | tha | PrimeNet | 8 | 2008-08-14 08:26 |
| Who made the new logo? | Kevin | Lounge | 10 | 2002-08-23 00:55 |