mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-08-08, 09:40   #1
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

207228 Posts
Default 51.5M - 52M to 2^59

:)
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-08, 13:57   #2
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

30568 Posts
Default

Up to?...
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-08, 15:54   #3
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

2·32·13·37 Posts
Default

Hmm...

I guess 2^59... It is taking ~40 seconds per exponent right now...

I just want to try LMH once so I understand the process...

When someone resumes work on a range does work begin from the beginning or from where the last person left off? For example, say I do the range to 2^59... Does the next person do *only* from 2^59 to 2^60 or do they do it all over?

Finally, if someone, for whatever reason, can't generate a worktodo.ini from decomp.exe and nofactor.cmp I would be willing to do it for them...

(I was tempted to just generate all the worktodo.ini files for all the open ranges and put them on the server but I don't know if that would be a good idea or not... Comments?)
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-08, 16:49   #4
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22·3·641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyzzy
When someone resumes work on a range does work begin from the beginning or from where the last person left off?
Well, if the last person reported all results and nofactor.cmp has been updated with them, it makes sense to start from where the last person left off. If the last person posts here to indicate where s/he stopped, you could just start from there.

There could be exceptional circumstances -- if you suspected a bug in the program that caused it to miss factors, or if it seems that the last person didn't understand the procedure and didn't process the range correctly or didn't report correctly.

Quote:
For example, say I do the range to 2^59... Does the next person do *only* from 2^59 to 2^60 or do they do it all over?
If you've properly reported your results, there's no reason for the next person to re-do them.

There probably are a few "holes" in GIMPS trial factoring, but we all can rest assured that the U.S. National Security Agency is re-doing all our calculations in accordance with the No Composite Left Behind Act (NCLBA) of 2001.
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-22, 04:31   #5
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

207228 Posts
Default

This range is done... There were 13,142 exponents tested and 235 factors found...
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



All times are UTC. The time now is 13:15.


Fri Jul 7 13:15:41 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 10:44, 0 users, load averages: 1.67, 1.26, 1.16

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔