![]() |
|
|
#45 |
|
Jan 2005
1110111112 Posts |
2 more down:
2529*22^3700-1 is prime 5751*22^4272+1 is prime |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
These base 10 candidates are all prime
2311*10^1000+1 2607*10^780+1 2683*10^1049+1 3301*10^1228+1 3312*10^960+1 3345*10^584+1 3981*10^1239+1 4863*10^1554+1 5125*10^1597+1 5556*10^1412+1 6841*10^771+1 7459*10^978+1 7534*10^1377+1 7866*10^1854+1 8454*10^1064+1 8724*10^996+1 8922*10^1020+1 9043*10^1342+1 1506*10^872-1 3015*10^1127-1 4577*10^1145-1 5499*10^544-1 5897*10^1159-1 6633*10^1753-1 7602*10^555-1 8174*10^753-1 9461*10^579-1 |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Oct 2006
7×37 Posts |
looking at all messages above, here are the actual work to do ... with reservation (limited)
it includes all confirmed observation: base 10 maybe screwed at the end (see post 49 or 50 from citrix and the possible bug in srsieve) Code:
Base 6: Sierpinski 1 to 243417 Reisel 1 to 213409 Base 7: Totally horrible. Possible covering set with repeat every 24 n is [19,5,43,1201,13,181,193,73], also 5 other sets perming 73, 193 and 409. Sierpinski and Riesel numbers are both lower than 162643669672445 Work is needed to find a low k value which is Riesel or Sierpinski. Base 8: Sierpinski 1 Riesel (done?) Base 9: Sierpinski (done ?) Riesel 4 jasong 16 36 64 Note 16 and 64 are subsets of 4. Base 10: Sierpinski 804*10^n+1 1024*10^n+1 2157*10^n+1 2661*10^n+1 4069*10^n+1 5028*10^n+1 5512*10^n+1 5565*10^n+1 6172*10^n+1 7404*10^n+1 7666*10^n+1 7809*10^n+1 8194*10^n+1 8425*10^n+1 8667*10^n+1 8889*10^n+1 9021*10^n+1 9175*10^n+1 Riesel 1343*10^n-1 1803*10^n-1 1935*10^n-1 2276*10^n-1 2333*10^n-1 3356*10^n-1 4016*10^n-1 4421*10^n-1 4478*10^n-1 6588*10^n-1 6665*10^n-1 7019*10^n-1 8579*10^n-1 9701*10^n-1 9824*10^n-1 10176*10^n-1 Base 11: Sierpinski 416 tnerual 958 tnerual Riesel 62 682 862 904 1528 2410 2690 3110 3544 3788 4208 4564 Base 12: Sierpinski 1 to 14599 Riesel 1 to 16328. Base 13: Sierpinski (done) Riesel 288 Base 14: done Base 15: Horrible. A covering set is [241,113,211,17,1489,13,3877], and Sierpinski and Riesel values are therefore less than 7330957703181619. As bad as the base 3 problem. Base 16: Sierpinski number not known, 186 (to be removed see post #49 below by citrix) 2158 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 2857 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 2908 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 3061 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 4885 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 5886 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 6348 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 6663 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 6712 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 7212 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 7258 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 7615 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 7651 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 7773 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 8025 (tested up to n=4000 by citrix) 10001 to 66740 Riesel 1343*16^n-1 1803*16^n-1 1935*16^n-1 2333*16^n-1 3015*16^n-1 3332*16^n-1 4478*16^n-1 4500*16^n-1 4577*16^n-1 5499*16^n-1 5897*16^n-1 6588*16^n-1 6633*16^n-1 6665*16^n-1 7019*16^n-1 7602*16^n-1 8174*16^n-1 8579*16^n-1 10001 to 33965 Base 17: Sierpinski 92 (LTD) 160 (LTD) 244 (LTD) 262 (LTD) Riesel (done) Base 18: Sierpinski 18 xentar 324 xentar 122 xentar 381 xentar Riesel (done) Base 19: ? Base 20: ? Base 21: Sierpinski 118 (checked to n=3500) riesel (done) Base 22: Sierpinski 22 484 942 1611 1908 2991 4233 5061 5128 5659 6234 6462 Riesel 185 1013 1335 2853 3104 3426 3656 4001 4070 4118 4302 4440 Last fiddled with by tnerual on 2007-01-07 at 21:56 Reason: with info up to post 50 |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
I think there is a bug in srsieve (although it could be the version I have). When I input all of the base 10 candidates, it immediately removes 9701*10^n-1, but if I sieve that separately or change my input list, it is not removed. Very odd.
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Jun 2003
110001011102 Posts |
@ rouge, I have checked base 10 upto 2100. Here are the candidates left.
804*10^n+1 1024*10^n+1 2157*10^n+1 2661*10^n+1 4069*10^n+1 5028*10^n+1 5512*10^n+1 5565*10^n+1 6172*10^n+1 7404*10^n+1 7666*10^n+1 7809*10^n+1 8194*10^n+1 8425*10^n+1 8667*10^n+1 8889*10^n+1 9021*10^n+1 9175*10^n+1 1343*10^n-1 1803*10^n-1 1935*10^n-1 2276*10^n-1 2333*10^n-1 3356*10^n-1 4016*10^n-1 4421*10^n-1 4478*10^n-1 6588*10^n-1 6665*10^n-1 7019*10^n-1 8579*10^n-1 9461*10^n-1 Here are some primes I found. 8922*10^504+1 8454*10^509+1 3312*10^544+1 5499*10^544+-1 7602*10^555+-1 3345*10^584+1 8174*10^753+-1 6841*10^771+1 2607*10^780+1 3301*10^788+1 3345*10^866+1 1506*10^872+-1 8724*10^924+1 3312*10^960+1 7459*10^978+1 8724*10^996+1 2311*10^1000+1 8922*10^1020+1 9043*10^1034+1 6633*10^1036+-1 2683*10^1049+1 8454*10^1064+1 7459*10^978+1 3015*10^1127+-1 4577*10^1145+-1 5897*10^1159+-1 3981*10^1239+1 7534*10^1377+1 5556*10^1412+1 4863*10^1554+1 5125*10^1597+1 7866*10^1854+1 3332*10^1952+-1 2111*10^1960+-1 8953*10^2057+1 6687*10^2097+1 The last few candidates are missing. Once srsieve removed 9701 from the sieve I assumed it was sierpinski and removed the ones after that from the sieve. same on the riesel side. You can continue on base 10. I will not work on it. Also for base 16. looking on prothsearch.net 93*2^586453+1 is prime. This removes 186. On riesel side 225*2^9005-1 is prime. So 450 is removed. Last fiddled with by Citrix on 2007-01-07 at 21:41 |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Oct 2006
7×37 Posts |
is there any application where i can enter the base (fixed), a range of k and then a starting n. then start the app.
the app must remove (and log) all prime k for n then test all remaining k for primality at the next n and so on. i'm sure there is something like that but i don't know what. citrix i think you use that (looking at your 10000 k range on base 16, you can't do it manually )
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Jun 2003
158210 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11000110100002 Posts |
Here are more base 10 primes:
2276*10^2726-1 2333*10^2113-1 4016*10^3647-1 4478*10^4817-1 6588*10^7442-1 9701*10^6538-1 9824*10^1857-1 1024*10^4554+1 2157*10^3560+1 2661*10^2681+1 5512*10^3004+1 5565*10^3175+1 804*10^7558+1 8425*10^3661+1 8667*10^6617+1 8889*10^7588+1 9021*10^8090+1 The remaining in base 10 are: 4069*10^n+1 5028*10^n+1 6172*10^n+1 7404*10^n+1 7666*10^n+1 7809*10^n+1 8194*10^n+1 1343*10^n-1 1803*10^n-1 1935*10^n-1 3356*10^n-1 4421*10^n-1 6665*10^n-1 7019*10^n-1 8579*10^n-1 I'll continue on these for a while. Last fiddled with by rogue on 2007-01-08 at 03:31 |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
194310 Posts |
Unfortunately not. 1*22^1+1=23 prime, but, I think we decided for the Sierpinski base 5 exercise, that we would not use n=0, otherwise k=22 could be eliminated but not 484.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
29·67 Posts |
Brilliant, it is worth checking the top 5000 and prothsearch from time to time!
Last fiddled with by robert44444uk on 2007-01-08 at 06:49 |
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
111100101112 Posts |
Unfortunately it is a trivial case, all n are divisible by 5.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Very Prime Riesel and Sierpinski k | robert44444uk | Open Projects | 587 | 2016-11-13 15:26 |
| Riesel/Sierp #'s for bases 3, 7, and 15 | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 105 | 2009-09-04 06:40 |
| Sierpinski/Riesel Base 10 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 11 | 2007-12-17 05:08 |
| Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 23 | michaf | Conjectures 'R Us | 2 | 2007-12-17 05:04 |
| Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 22 | michaf | Conjectures 'R Us | 49 | 2007-12-17 05:03 |