mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Twin Prime Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2006-11-13, 20:39   #34
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

3×113 Posts
Default

Ok.

Gribozavr, are you sieving until 25G ?

In the future (if no primes are found, of course) should somebody start sieving
from 25G to, say, 50G with these parameters in NewPGen (correct me if wrong):

Quote:
base:2
n: 195000
kmin: 25000000000
kmax: 50000000000
type: k.b^n+-1
Verify results : checked
?
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-13, 22:40   #35
gribozavr
 
gribozavr's Avatar
 
Mar 2005
Internet; Ukraine, Kiev

11·37 Posts
Default

Yes, to 25G = 25e12
gribozavr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 00:51   #36
jasong
 
jasong's Avatar
 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005

3×7×167 Posts
Default

I think it would be a good idea to do distributed sieving at some point. If I'm not mistaken, it can be implemented easily in NewPGen. Of course, the problem would be trying to figure out how to have different sized work-units. If it's simply a matter of text-editing, maybe someone could write a tutorial?
jasong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 09:35   #37
Rytis
 
Rytis's Avatar
 
Nov 2006

23·11 Posts
Default

Quick update: first BOINCLLR workunit finished successfully in 6 minutes 18 seconds under Celeron M 1.3GHz :)

925002423*2^195000-1isnotprime.LLRRes64:9EAF7A23BA5551FCTime:512.384sec.
(don't ask me why it is compressed without spaces. Who needs them anyway :D)
Rytis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 12:30   #38
victor
 
victor's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Fribourg, CH

22·32·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacionet View Post
Ok.

Gribozavr, are you sieving until 25G ?

In the future (if no primes are found, of course) should somebody start sieving
from 25G to, say, 50G with these parameters in NewPGen (correct me if wrong):



?
I've got a gentoo box, 805D 2.66Ghz. I could sieve this range with it :)
victor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 13:01   #39
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

5238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rytis View Post
Quick update: first BOINCLLR workunit finished successfully in 6 minutes 18 seconds under Celeron M 1.3GHz :)

925002423*2^195000-1isnotprime.LLRRes64:9EAF7A23BA5551FCTime:512.384sec.
(don't ask me why it is compressed without spaces. Who needs them anyway :D)
Uhm ... it seems to me that 512 sec is too much (usually LLR.exe takes just 100 sec).
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 13:32   #40
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

23·683 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pacionet View Post
Uhm ... it seems to me that 512 sec is too much (usually LLR.exe takes just 100 sec).
On a Pentium M 1.4 GHz:
925002423*2^195000-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 9EAF7A23BA5551FC Time : 329.647 sec.

BTW, 6 min 18 sec <> 512 sec
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 13:53   #41
pacionet
 
pacionet's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Italy

3·113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasong View Post
I think it would be a good idea to do distributed sieving at some point. If I'm not mistaken, it can be implemented easily in NewPGen. Of course, the problem would be trying to figure out how to have different sized work-units. If it's simply a matter of text-editing, maybe someone could write a tutorial?

Do you mean assigning different ranges to different users or what ?
pacionet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 15:04   #42
Rytis
 
Rytis's Avatar
 
Nov 2006

1308 Posts
Default

It was 6 minutes 18 seconds CPU time, and above 8 minutes wall clock time (it is still increasing when BOINC has suspended the calculations). I'm not sure if it's related to modified client or not, but I think I got pretty much the same speed with original LLR client, so I guess it does not make any difference. I'll probably implement the work generator today and we can test the speed tomorrow :)
Rytis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 16:44   #43
victor
 
victor's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
Fribourg, CH

3748 Posts
Default

Sieving 25G-50G has started :
Code:
Please, enter your choice (0) : 2
Base = 2
Include even k's ? (n) : n
n = 195000
kmin = 25000000000
kmax = 50000000000
The range of k that you have specified (25000000001) is too large to fit into the bitmap, which can hold -226492416 k's.
This is not too much of a problem, as NewPGen will break this up into 0 smaller ranges and sieve each in turn up to 1 billion before combining them and sieving together.
However, you might like to consider increasing the bitmap size. Do you wish to continue? (y) : y
Type : Twin: k.b^n�1
Are you ready to start sieving ? (y) : y
CPU capabilities: CMOV: Supported. SSE2: Supported.
Using bitmap : allocating 485.0Mb of RAM...
...succeeded
Sieving from k = 25000000000 to k = 29068474880...
Sieving numbers with 58712 decimal digits
Well, I got 1Gb of RAM, but newpgen doesn't allow me to set bitmap size over 485Mb...
victor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-11-14, 21:30   #44
KEP
Quasi Admin Thing
 
KEP's Avatar
 
May 2005

17×59 Posts
Default

Rytis have 50 LLR results ready for testing, I've done the 50 first results, and Rytis is looking for others to help him test the 50 counter results, which should be used for validating the test. Anohter advantage by letting Rytis help us test all the ranges, and you to only manage the sieving, is that every result is double checked right away :) Go join primegrid and then do following:

Push "View or edit" in the row containing "PrimeGrid preferrences"
Choose yes in "Run Test Application"

See U all at Primegrid :) Also in case of troubles, feel free to ask questions :)
KEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BOINC Unregistered Information & Answers 6 2010-09-21 03:31
BOINC.BE BATKrikke Teams 2 2010-03-05 18:57
Boinc Xentar Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 4 2009-04-25 10:26
BOINC? masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 1 2009-02-09 01:10
BOINC bebarce Software 3 2005-12-15 18:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:41.


Fri Jul 7 13:41:34 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 11:10, 0 users, load averages: 0.59, 0.95, 1.08

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔