![]() |
|
|
#89 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
101010000000012 Posts |
Quote:
The sizes, per se, aren't particularly bad in comparison with modern disks. A problem is that some filesystems have a maximum file size of, say, 2GB. Another problem is that some operating systems have a maximum contiguous virtual address space of 1GB or so (vanilla 32-bit Windows XP) or 2GB (common on other 32-bit operating systems) or something under 3GB (32-bit Windows XP booted in /3gb mode). Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Sep 2005
UGent
22·3·5 Posts |
I guess in this case, the only solution is to run 64-bit software. If your program allocates 3GB of RAM, you are getting close to the theoretic limit of 4GB in a 32-bit program. You cannot really blame the OS for this. Of course, you can also change the software not to allocate so much virtual memory (you could use a ramdisk file system to store data, this should be almost as fast as simply malloc()ating memory, especially if you mmap() the file).
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
We have another ECM "near" miss.
2,1550L = p52.p130 p52 = 2204849283056077770183700917441626363341403201988701 I omit the p130 here. The Linear algebra for 6,281- is about 75% done and 5,329- has finished sieving. I am starting to do 6,305-, but do not know if I will get to finish it. I am still waiting for my office to be moved. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Current status | fivemack | NFSNET Discussion | 97 | 2009-04-17 22:50 |
| Considering current hardware on the status page | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 20 | 2007-05-24 18:10 |
| Current Status | moo | LMH > 100M | 0 | 2006-09-02 01:15 |
| Current status "fishing" | HiddenWarrior | Operation Billion Digits | 1 | 2005-08-19 21:42 |
| Current Status of the Cunningham Tables | rogue | Cunningham Tables | 4 | 2005-06-10 18:28 |