![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Oct 2006
3 Posts |
I have a P4 D805 processor running at the normal 2.666GHz and get iteration times of 0.092sec if running only a single instance of prime95 (50% CPU utilization) but if I try running two instances of prime95 (with affinities set to different cores and 100% CPU utilization) the iteration times more than double to 0.199sec. The CPU-Z program doesn't show any CPU throttling and I have varied fan speeds to change my CPU temperature from 47C to 67C (monitored by MBM5) with no effect on single or double instance iteration times.
Does anyone have a similar experience or an explaination as to what is happening? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
2·3·281 Posts |
I had a D830 and have a D945. With both processors I had the same benchmark results running one instance of prime95 or two (one on each core obviously.)
Is it LL iteration times you speak of? If it is P-1 stage two or torture tests, you might not have enough memory and the OS would start swapping. D8XX processors are quite sturdy, but I would try to keep the temperature under 65°C: thermal specifications from Intel is 64.1°C. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Feb 2006
AR, US
24×32 Posts |
Check to make sure cpu affinity is set to '0' for one core, and '1' for the other core.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
May 2005
31308 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Oct 2006
3 Posts |
Yes it is the LL iterations and the memory usage of each instance is only ~23mb. Also, I do have the affinities set to "0" on one and "1" on the other instance but it makes no difference which I add as the 2nd instance so both cores are performing the same with one instance.
One other piece of info is that I have tried it both on XP-pro and Linux-64 Fedora and get very similar results. When using Linux I get a CPU throttling warning only if I try overclocking to ~3.1MHz and add the second instance. That's why I'm not overclocking when trying to run 2 instances. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Oct 2006
310 Posts |
I just swapped out my 266MHz DDR memory with a 333MHz DDR memory from another computer and this made a significant difference in iteration times. Single instance times went from 0.092sec to 0.085sec and double instance times went from 0.199sec to 0.131sec. It looks like memory speed makes a significant impact on interation speed, particularly with dual processors. I'm now going to look into upgrading to 533MHz DDR2 memory if I can find a good price.
Has anyone else noticed a difference with different memory speeds?? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to retire one core in a dual-core CPU? | Rodrigo | PrimeNet | 4 | 2011-07-30 14:43 |
| Dual Core to Quad Core Upgrade | Rodrigo | Hardware | 6 | 2010-11-29 18:48 |
| Dual Core P95 64Bit P4 Equivalent problem | g0ods | Software | 9 | 2009-09-15 14:12 |
| Importance of dual channel memory for dual core processors | patrik | Hardware | 3 | 2007-01-07 09:26 |
| Intel e6600 Dual Core Problem - How to use both cores with Prime95? | Shoallakeboy | Hardware | 2 | 2006-11-06 17:55 |