mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Prime Sierpinski Project

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2006-04-04, 01:14   #34
Dagger
 
Dec 2005

516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDave
Very much appreciated, Greenbank.

The chart reveals how much work has gone into recording the seiving runs so far and paints an interesting picture. Still a lot of white there for us to fill in.

I look forward to rating my little farm on the combined set in the next week.
I have managed 1350kp/sec on the non-combined. I have read of the decrease in kp/sec but everyone's combinations of CPUs is different so I wait to see.

Cheers.
I'm seeing a ~33% (PSP) and ~42% (SOB) decrease in sieving speeds. PSP alone was 520kp/s while SOB was 600 kp/s. I run a dualcore so I split my ranges in half. So would that be 1140 and 1200 kp/s respectfully? Right now i'm running 340 kp/s per core which is 680 total. Still 3 times faster than the last Reisel sieve i did.

AMDAthlon 64 X2 4200+
1GB RAM, 2.2GHz not OC'd

Last fiddled with by Dagger on 2006-04-04 at 01:15
Dagger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-04-04, 09:24   #35
Greenbank
 
Greenbank's Avatar
 
Jul 2005

2·193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagger
I'm seeing a ~33% (PSP) and ~42% (SOB) decrease in sieving speeds. PSP alone was 520kp/s while SOB was 600 kp/s. I run a dualcore so I split my ranges in half. So would that be 1140 and 1200 kp/s respectfully? Right now i'm running 340 kp/s per core which is 680 total. Still 3 times faster than the last Reisel sieve i did.

AMDAthlon 64 X2 4200+
1GB RAM, 2.2GHz not OC'd
Think of it this way:

You run PSP on a small range (lets say 100G) and it will take:-

100*10^9/520000 = 192307 seconds

You run SoB on the same 100G range and it will take:-

100*10^9/600000 = 166666 seconds.

So to do both you'll need 358973 seconds. But you've got a dual core so you run both at the same time (with a bit of fiddling as the SoB range will end first) you could do them in: 179486 seconds.

Or you could split the range in two, and do combined sieving:-

50*10^9/340000 = 147058 seconds.

So combined sieving is faster than doing both one after each other.
Greenbank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-01, 13:44   #36
VJS
 
VJS's Avatar
 
Dec 2004

13×23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenbank View Post
k=265711 noskval=133752 mod 120: 0(45337) 24(46172) 48(42243)

k should be obvious.
noskval is the number of entries for that k in the dat file.

45337 of these numbers are n = 0 mod 120.
46172 of these numbers are n = 24 mod 120.
42243 of these numbers are n = 48 mod 120.

Hey Greenbank could you do your above analysis for the SoB k's?
VJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPS /combined UPS and PS for P95 computer Christenson Hardware 12 2011-10-27 03:41
Combined sieving discussion ltd Prime Sierpinski Project 76 2008-07-25 11:44
Sieve Discussion em99010pepe Prime Cullen Prime 61 2007-06-07 22:23
Sieve discussion Meaning of first/second pass, combined Citrix Prime Sierpinski Project 14 2005-12-31 19:39
New Sieve Thread Discussion Citrix Prime Sierpinski Project 15 2005-08-29 13:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:03.


Fri Jul 16 16:03:12 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 13:50, 1 user, load averages: 1.94, 1.98, 1.83

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.