![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Aug 2002
25 Posts |
With all the talk about the error rate of the LL test in the Math forum, I got to thinking about factoring. I noticed that since version 19, the amount of factoring done takes into account the cost of double checking. This would mean the cost of two LL tests. What about the cost of triple checking? Would it be wiser to do slightly more factoring because, on average, it takes a little more than 2 LL tests to determine a Mersenne number is composite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
You'll be happy to know that Prime95 does indeed take the average L-L error rate (currently, 1.8%) into account when deciding how much P-1 factoring to do prior to an L-L test. :)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| amount of primes with p=n^2+1 | bhelmes | Computer Science & Computational Number Theory | 3 | 2017-02-21 15:00 |
| amount of memory when P-1 factoring | wildrabbitt | Hardware | 3 | 2015-03-11 16:41 |
| A certain amount of mild vexation | fivemack | Hardware | 5 | 2009-01-07 14:44 |
| Choosing amount of memory | azhad | Software | 2 | 2004-10-16 16:41 |
| Optimum amount of RAM for P-1 testing | dave_0273 | Data | 3 | 2003-11-01 17:07 |