![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
I think we should eliminate the concept of First pass and second pass, since we have to use the same .dat file anyway. First pass and second pass just makes things confusing.
Any objections? Citrix |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
How to call it then?
"combined" and "PSP only"????? Lars |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Aug 2005
Brazil
5528 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Jun 2003
2×7×113 Posts |
Quote:
I think we will do this then(if everyone else agrees). But there is no need to make a FAQ etc for right now. There is a range of less than 10 T that lies in the "red zone". We should finish this first and once this is done all the red stuff will go away anyway and things will become simpler, as Ltd indicated in one of his previous posts. Citrix |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Combined sieving discussion | ltd | Prime Sierpinski Project | 76 | 2008-07-25 11:44 |
| Sieve Discussion | em99010pepe | Prime Cullen Prime | 61 | 2007-06-07 22:23 |
| Combined Sieve Guide Discussion | Joe O | Prime Sierpinski Project | 35 | 2006-09-01 13:44 |
| Combined Sieving? | jaat | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 5 | 2006-04-18 02:26 |
| New Sieve Thread Discussion | Citrix | Prime Sierpinski Project | 15 | 2005-08-29 13:56 |