![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Apr 2003
22·193 Posts |
For the double check with the llr bug i made an analysis of all returned result files and marked all WU where i was not a 100% sure that they are not run with a different client. So that range contains more WU then really were returned by the buggy client.
For the test with the error both first and second pass test have been done by you the triple check was done by me. First and third test had a residue of 18F97D91F7349A51 The second pass test had: A8E8F0097D56F1C7 Lars |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
Ill try to eliminate the candidate by p-1. Thanks!
Last fiddled with by Citrix on 2005-10-23 at 20:03 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| double check server online | ltd | Prime Sierpinski Project | 126 | 2013-07-16 11:51 |
| Double Check | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 3 | 2011-10-01 04:38 |
| First check and double check llrnet servers. | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 3 | 2009-01-02 01:50 |
| Double-check check? | M0CZY | Software | 15 | 2008-10-30 14:20 |
| Here's why we double-check... | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 0 | 2008-02-11 19:23 |