![]() |
|
|
#1112 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3×23×89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1113 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×2,927 Posts |
It has been a few years since I've test-sieved a quartic; I'm due to refresh myself, so I volunteer to generate params for f-small if desired. I vaguely recall that quartics benefit from a large sieve area but are pretty fast in sec/rel.
Is this number interesting enough to run as a CADO team effort? I'm willing to host the job and donate a machine-month (20 old ivy bridge xeon cores, about as fast as 8 ryzen-7900 cores). |
|
|
|
|
|
#1114 |
|
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
23·71 Posts |
Please add at least eight Zen 3 core-months from me, please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1115 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
Quote:
Would be glad to take part, although my resources are fairly limited. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1116 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
59×67 Posts |
I'll put 10K @ 850e6 at yoyo tonight for starters. I could help with a team sieve but I only contributed 1% the last time around with my Sandy/Ivy Bridge boxes.
@Oliver: Do you know when yoyo might implement the stage 2 only feature on his site? |
|
|
|
|
|
#1117 | |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2×2,927 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1118 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
59×67 Posts |
Code:
n: 11762658718349861390232119244704668953655520173988132853958736559505227543720741129707951916855819491584483404706118568545301944488029224273208806055167884044998017282642609466917674130929252487860835945397664760737343625974929824544969881973722726911 # 1310825268269643509279336731098526398390609803239319801398048897^5-1, difficulty: 252.47, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45 # cost: 1.00224e+19, est. time: 4772.57 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 1.000 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: -1 Y0: 1310825268269643509279336731098526398390609803239319801398048897 Last fiddled with by RichD on 2023-05-17 at 22:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1119 |
|
Apr 2020
3·353 Posts |
If you're using CADO, I suspect this may be in the range where A=30 with adjust-strategy=2 is fastest. Large prime bounds skewed towards the rational side, 33/31 or 34/32.
My cores are busy with Cunninghams so will not contribute to this - @RichD that'll help you get a higher percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1120 |
|
Jan 2009
Bilbao, Spain
317 Posts |
c80-89 done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1121 |
|
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
110011000012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1122 |
|
Jan 2009
Bilbao, Spain
317 Posts |
c90-99 done.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive Pascal | Xyzzy | GPU Computing | 1 | 2017-05-17 20:22 |
| Tesla P100 — 5.4 DP TeraFLOPS — Pascal | Mark Rose | GPU Computing | 52 | 2016-07-02 12:11 |
| Nvidia Pascal, a third of DP | firejuggler | GPU Computing | 12 | 2016-02-23 06:55 |
| Calculating perfect numbers in Pascal | Elhueno | Homework Help | 5 | 2008-06-12 16:37 |
| Factorization attempt to a c163 - a new Odd Perfect Number roadblock | jchein1 | Factoring | 30 | 2005-05-30 14:43 |