![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Jul 2003
Thuringia; Germany
2×29 Posts |
Quote:
For q=53 the number 5 is a quadratic residue, but M_q does not hold a fermat-test with base 5. Cyrix Last fiddled with by cyrix on 2005-09-11 at 19:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Feb 2004
France
22·229 Posts |
Hi Cyrix,
About what I said about proving that a Pépin's-like test can be used for Mersenne numbers, look at the bottom of page 4 of this paper, which clearly shows that one can prove the Pépin's test (with k=3) for Fermat numbers by means of technics developped by Lucas and refined by Ribenboim for Mersenne numbers, and that I generalized and applied to Fermat numbers. So I guess the same could be done (with k=5) for Mersenne numbers. The problem is to find the appropriate Lucas Sequence, I think. Tony |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Property of pseudoprime numbers by base 2 AND / OR 3 | allasc | And now for something completely different | 1 | 2017-05-17 15:00 |
| new property of prime numbers discovered? | ixfd64 | Math | 1 | 2016-03-14 21:53 |
| A conjecture on a new property of Mersenne primes | Thiele | Math | 18 | 2010-05-23 05:35 |
| Curious property of Mersenne numbers. | arithmeticae | Lounge | 5 | 2008-10-27 06:15 |
| A property of Fermat numbers. Already known ? | T.Rex | Math | 6 | 2006-09-17 22:11 |